Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.

Photo: Phelipemancheno · CC0 · via Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale
Ecuador places highest on Gender Development Index (top 3% worldwide) and lowest on Agriculture Orientation Index (bottom 5%).
Population
17,980,083
people
since 1950
Land area
248,360
km²
since 1961
GDP per person
14,319
international $, PPP
since 1990
Life expectancy
77.39
years at birth
since 1950
Human development
0.777
HDI, 0–1
since 1990
Unemployment
3.308
% of the labour force
since 1991
The newest published figure for each, the year it describes and who published it, with a line showing how it has moved.
01The country
As Wikidata records them. Official languages are the least consistent — some countries list only a national language, others every regional one. Sources and licences.
02Country Index 2026
Strongest first. Each position is Ecuador’s place among the countries with a standing on that topic, built from a few key statistics chosen to measure different things.
11thof 161
From 2 of 3 key statistics
46thof 182
From 4 of 4 key statistics
50thof 178
From 3 of 3 key statistics
62ndof 182
From 3 of 4 key statistics
75thof 193
From 5 of 5 key statistics
joint88thof 194
From 3 of 3 key statistics
111thof 201
From 4 of 4 key statistics
113thof 198
From 3 of 3 key statistics
95thof 150
From 3 of 3 key statistics
97thof 147
From 2 of 3 key statistics
117thof 177
From 3 of 3 key statistics
137thof 191
From 3 of 3 key statistics
Each standing is built from a few key statistics chosen to measure different things. Select a subject for Ecuador’s readings on it, or see every statistic held for Ecuador in the table further down this page.
03Highs and lows
The two ends of its own record: every statistic on which Ecuador sits within ten places of the best or worst in the world, plus its strongest and weakest readings overall. Each is turned into a percentile — its place among every country measured — which is what lets a hunger score and a press-freedom rank be compared at all.
In the top third of all countries measured. 1 is within ten places of the best in the world, in a field of at least 50 countries — marked with that place.
Position · derived 6th of 184 · 0.998 · 2023
world median 0.971 (better) · ▲ 27 pts since 2013
Position · derived 157th of 177 · 1 = worst · 1.14 · 2023
world median 10 (better) · ▲ 7 pts since 2013
Position · derived 27th of 181 · 24,821 · 2022
world median 2,528 (better)
In the bottom third of all countries measured. 4 are within ten places of the worst in the world, in a field of at least 50 countries — marked with that place.
Position · derived 7th of 73 · 1 = worst · 45.47 · 2022
world median 33.91 (worse) · ▼ 3 pts since 2012
Position · derived 125th of 132 · 0.06 · 2024
world median 0.305 (worse) · ▼ 43 pts since 2014
Position · derived 66th of 73 · 4.67 · 2022
world median 7.08 (worse)
Position · derived 59th of 68 · 9.927 · 2022
world median 17.81 (worse) · ▼ 23 pts since 2012
Position · derived 18th of 193 · 1 = worst · 24.14 · 2025
world median 4.17 (worse) · ▼ 4 pts since 2015
A band is a place among the countries each publisher scores, so Ecuador can move because other countries moved. See the Country Index for the full method.
04Over time
The published rank in widely quoted reports, edition by edition — each end with the size of that year’s field — and the statistics, not already named above, on which it has gained or lost the most ground.
UNDP Human Development Report Office
67th
of 141 · 1990
88th
of 193 · 2023
Ranked in 34 of 34 editions
Transparency International
117th
of 173 · 2012
116th
of 181 · 2025
Ranked in 14 of 14 editions
UNDP Human Development Report Office
67th
of 79 · 1990
88th
of 172 · 2023
Ranked in 34 of 34 editions
World Intellectual Property Organization
98th
of 132 · 2022
113th
of 139 · 2025
Ranked in 4 of 4 editions
Growth Lab at Harvard University
113th
of 140 · 1995
110th
of 145 · 2024
Ranked in 30 of 30 editions
Oxford Insights
125th
of 172 · 2020
66th
of 195 · 2025
Ranked in 6 of 6 editions
Where Ecuador has climbed against the rest of the world, in percentile points.
Where Ecuador has slipped against the rest of the world, in percentile points.
05In context
A position reads best beside the countries around it. Every position below is a place in the world ranking of 174, not within the region.
06The evidence
Grouped by topic. Each row gives the newest edition’s rank or position, the published value and the year the numbers describe — select a row for the world median, the best in the world and the trend.
Bottom fifth · bottom 5% of 132 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Agriculture orientation index (1.0 = spending matches sector size)
Ecuador 0.06 · world median 0.305 (worse)
Best in the world 5.38 (Singapore)
▼ -43 percentile points since 2014
Middle · bottom 46% of 198 countries measured
CIVICUS · Civic space score (0–100)
Ecuador 46.73 · world median 50.46 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (Kiribati)
No earlier reading to compare
Lower middle · bottom 29% of 185 countries measured
UNICEF · Children under 5 whose birth is registered (%)
Ecuador 88.2 · world median 98.4 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (53 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
Lower middle · bottom 36% of 182 countries measured · 182 share 181 positions
Transparency International · CPI score (0–100, where 100 is very clean)
Ecuador 33 · world median 39 (worse)
Best in the world 89 (Denmark)
No real change since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 27% of 109 countries measured
World Bank Group · Total debt service (% of exports of goods, services and primary income)
Ecuador 21.86 · world median 12.93 (worse)
Best in the world 0.285 (Iran)
▼ -3 percentile points since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 36% of 110 countries measured
World Bank Group · External debt stocks (% of GNI)
Ecuador 49.75 · world median 43.94 (worse)
Best in the world 2.213 (Iran)
▼ -33 percentile points since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 31% of 132 countries measured
World Bank Group · General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)
Ecuador 12.82 · world median 16.21
Highest 38.94 (Ukraine)
▼ -13 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 34% of 195 countries measured
Oxford Insights · AI readiness score (0–100)
Ecuador 53.04 · world median 40.19 (better)
Best in the world 88.36 (United States)
▲ +39 percentile points since 2020
Middle · bottom 42% of 209 countries measured
World Bank Group · Governance estimate (−2.5 weak to 2.5 strong)
Ecuador -0.22 · world median 0.01 (worse)
Best in the world 2.28 (Singapore)
▼ -6 percentile points since 2014
Bottom fifth · bottom 13% of 68 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Government funding per primary student (% of GDP per capita)
Ecuador 9.927 · world median 17.81 (worse)
Best in the world 34.57 (South Korea)
▼ -23 percentile points since 2012
Middle · top 47% of 123 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Government expenditure on education (% of GDP)
Ecuador 3.82 · world median 3.709 (better)
Best in the world 16.39 (Kiribati)
▼ -13 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 34% of 168 countries measured
Open Data Watch · ODIN overall score (0–100)
Ecuador 65 · world median 59 (better)
Best in the world 90 (2 countries tied)
▲ +38 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 24% of 135 countries measured
World Bank Group · Public sector employment (% of total employment)
Ecuador 7.056 · world median 15.01
Highest 47.1 (Maldives)
No earlier reading to compare
Upper middle · top 36% of 168 countries measured
World Bank Group · Public sector wage bill (% of GDP)
Ecuador 9.642 · world median 7.975
Highest 42.65 (Nauru)
No real change since 2012
Lower middle · bottom 26% of 209 countries measured
World Bank Group · Regulatory Quality (−2.5 to 2.5)
Ecuador -0.646 · world median -0.09 (worse)
Best in the world 2.132 (Singapore)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 21% of 211 countries measured
World Bank Group · Rule of Law estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)
Ecuador -0.965 · world median -0.1 (worse)
Best in the world 2.021 (Finland)
▲ +5 percentile points since 2014
Upper middle · top 35% of 188 countries measured
World Bank Group · SPI overall score (0–100)
Ecuador 79.86 · world median 69.3 (better)
Best in the world 94.14 (Norway)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2016
Upper middle · top 39% of 176 countries measured
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Electoral democracy index (0–1)
Ecuador 0.607 · world median 0.497 (better)
Best in the world 0.913 (Denmark)
▲ +11 percentile points since 2015
Middle · bottom 48% of 208 countries measured
World Bank Group · Voice and Accountability estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)
Ecuador -0.105 · world median -0.02 (worse)
Best in the world 1.929 (Norway)
▲ +11 percentile points since 2014
Upper middle · top 26% of 190 countries measured
World Bank Group · WBL Index (0–100, where 100 is full legal parity)
Ecuador 89.38 · world median 81.25 (better)
Best in the world 100 (14 countries tied)
▼ -3 percentile points since 2014
Middle · bottom 41% of 139 countries measured
World Bank Group · Adults with an account (% of population aged 15+)
Ecuador 64.51 · world median 72.83 (worse)
Best in the world 99.85 (Iceland)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 25% of 118 countries measured
World Bank Group · Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (% of GNI)
Ecuador 2.357 · world median 8.389 (worse)
Best in the world 32.18 (Bangladesh)
▼ -13 percentile points since 2011
Lower middle · bottom 30% of 209 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Agricultural land (% of land area)
Ecuador 21.54 · world median 37.96
Highest 86.48 (Côte d’Ivoire)
▼ -10 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 37% of 158 countries measured
World Bank Group · Agriculture, forestry and fishing value added (% of GDP)
Ecuador 9.703 · world median 6.572
Highest 47.59 (Niger)
▲ +8 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 35% of 179 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Cereal yield (kg per hectare)
Ecuador 4,025 · world median 3,072 (better)
Best in the world 29,147 (Oman)
▲ +22 percentile points since 2013
Middle · top 44% of 103 countries measured
UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) · Container port traffic (TEU, twenty-foot equivalent units)
Ecuador 2,567,040 · world median 1,827,788
Highest 299,703,800 (China)
▼ -16 percentile points since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 34% of 195 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Crop production index (2014–2016 = 100)
Ecuador 100.03 · world median 106.23 (worse)
Best in the world 189.93 (Senegal)
▼ -15 percentile points since 2012
Lower middle · bottom 24% of 145 countries measured
Growth Lab at Harvard University · ECI score (standardised, roughly −3 to +3)
Ecuador -0.84 · world median 0.131 (worse)
Best in the world 1.729 (Japan)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2014
Middle · bottom 42% of 138 countries measured
World Bank Group · Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)
Ecuador 31.44 · world median 36.34
Highest 199.76 (Hong Kong)
▲ +14 percentile points since 2015
Top fifth · top 16% of 191 countries measured · 191 share 188 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Fertilizer consumption (kg per hectare of arable land)
Ecuador 216.91 · world median 87.36
Highest 2,926 (Malaysia)
No real change since 2013
Lower middle · bottom 24% of 195 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Food production index (2014–2016 = 100)
Ecuador 98.86 · world median 106.08 (worse)
Best in the world 177.49 (Senegal)
▼ -35 percentile points since 2012
Middle · top 43% of 186 countries measured
World Bank Group · GDP growth (annual %)
Ecuador 3.726 · world median 3.396 (better)
Best in the world 19.34 (Guyana)
▲ +43 percentile points since 2015
Middle · bottom 43% of 185 countries measured
World Bank Group · GDP per capita (constant 2021 international $, PPP)
Ecuador 14,319 · world median 17,265 (worse)
Best in the world 139,593 (Singapore)
▼ -2 percentile points since 2015
Bottom fifth · bottom 8% of 73 countries measured
World Bank Group · Gini index (0 = perfect equality, 100 = perfect inequality)
Ecuador 45.47 · world median 33.91 (worse)
Best in the world 24.08 (Slovakia)
▼ -3 percentile points since 2012
Bottom fifth · bottom 19% of 139 countries measured
World Intellectual Property Organization · GII score (0–100)
Ecuador 19.54 · world median 28.52 (worse)
Best in the world 65.96 (Switzerland)
▼ -7 percentile points since 2022
Middle · bottom 50% of 102 countries measured
World Bank Group · GNI per capita (constant 2021 international $, PPP)
Ecuador 14,256 · world median 14,273 (worse)
Best in the world 116,633 (Singapore)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 35% of 131 countries measured
World Bank Group · Gross capital formation (% of GDP)
Ecuador 20.94 · world median 22.93
Highest 45.27 (Algeria)
▼ -8 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 39% of 146 countries measured
World Bank Group · Gross savings (% of GDP)
Ecuador 25.13 · world median 22.06
Highest 47.82 (Macau)
▼ -11 percentile points since 2014
Middle · top 48% of 131 countries measured
World Bank Group · Household and NPISH final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)
Ecuador 62.72 · world median 62.04
Highest 133.34 (Somalia)
▼ -2 percentile points since 2015
Bottom fifth · bottom 11% of 120 countries measured · 120 share 119 positions
UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) · ICT goods exports (% of total goods exports)
Ecuador 0.05 · world median 0.975 (worse)
Best in the world 61.45 (Hong Kong)
No real change since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 23% of 138 countries measured
World Bank Group · Imports of goods and services (% of GDP)
Ecuador 27.92 · world median 41.72
Highest 196.89 (Hong Kong)
▲ +9 percentile points since 2015
Middle · top 41% of 158 countries measured
World Bank Group · Industry, including construction, value added (% of GDP)
Ecuador 25.67 · world median 24.65
Highest 75.09 (Guyana)
▼ -12 percentile points since 2015
Middle · top 45% of 169 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · IHDI (0–1)
Ecuador 0.64 · world median 0.609 (better)
Best in the world 0.923 (Iceland)
No real change since 2013
Upper middle · top 30% of 167 countries measured · 167 share 175 positions
UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) · LSCI (index, average Q1 2023 = 100)
Ecuador 113.91 · world median 56.21 (better)
Best in the world 1,319 (China)
No real change since 2016
Upper middle · top 29% of 188 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Livestock units per hectare of agricultural land
Ecuador 0.9 · world median 0.535
Highest 43.97 (Singapore)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2013
Bottom fifth · bottom 17% of 194 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Livestock production index (2014–2016 = 100)
Ecuador 93.93 · world median 107.06 (worse)
Best in the world 190.08 (Malawi)
▼ -35 percentile points since 2012
Upper middle · top 37% of 132 countries measured
World Bank Group · Manufacturing value added (% of GDP)
Ecuador 13.24 · world median 11.26
Highest 43.97 (Puerto Rico)
▼ -10 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 22% of 130 countries measured
OECD Development Assistance Committee · Net ODA received (% of GNI)
Ecuador 0.47 · world median 2.579
Highest 101.78 (Tuvalu)
▲ +5 percentile points since 2013
Lower middle · bottom 21% of 73 countries measured · 73 share 69 positions
World Bank Group · Poverty gap at $3.00 a day, 2021 PPP (%)
Ecuador 1.44 · world median 0.42 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (5 countries tied)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2012
Lower middle · bottom 28% of 73 countries measured · 73 share 71 positions
World Bank Group · Population below $3.00 a day, 2021 PPP (%)
Ecuador 4.44 · world median 1.05 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (3 countries tied)
▼ -6 percentile points since 2012
Lower middle · bottom 32% of 73 countries measured
World Bank Group · Population below $8.30 a day, 2021 PPP (%)
Ecuador 30.91 · world median 10.79 (worse)
Best in the world 0.04 (Cyprus)
▼ -8 percentile points since 2012
Lower middle · bottom 32% of 73 countries measured
World Bank Group · Average factor incomes must rise by to reach $28 a day
Ecuador 3.277 · world median 2.118 (worse)
Best in the world 0.43 (Luxembourg)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2012
Upper middle · top 30% of 197 countries measured · 197 share 180 positions
World Bank Group · Natural resources rents (% of GDP)
Ecuador 6.699 · world median 1.708
Highest 61.03 (Libya)
▼ -10 percentile points since 2011
Lower middle · bottom 33% of 138 countries measured
World Bank Group · Exports plus imports (% of GDP)
Ecuador 59.36 · world median 79.68
Highest 396.65 (Hong Kong)
▲ +15 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 36% of 126 countries measured · 126 share 99 positions
World Energy Council · Trilemma score (0–100)
Ecuador 67.7 · world median 63.8 (better)
Best in the world 83.2 (Denmark)
No earlier reading to compare
Lower middle · bottom 36% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person
Ecuador 37.13 · world median 38.89
Highest 54.7 (Bhutan)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 28% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employment in agriculture (% of total employment)
Ecuador 32.48 · world median 14.38
Highest 85.34 (Burundi)
▲ +13 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 33% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employment in industry (% of total employment)
Ecuador 16.59 · world median 18.88
Highest 39.44 (Oman)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 34% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employment in services (% of total employment)
Ecuador 50.93 · world median 59.51
Highest 92.17 (Djibouti)
▼ -11 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 30% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employed share of the population aged 15+ (%)
Ecuador 62.36 · world median 57.72 (better)
Best in the world 86.9 (Qatar)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2015
Top fifth · top 14% of 52 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers
Ecuador 1 · world median 2.005 (better)
Best in the world 0.12 (Belgium)
No earlier reading to compare
Middle · bottom 45% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Women aged 15+ in the labour force (%)
Ecuador 52.39 · world median 53.36 (worse)
Best in the world 82.91 (Madagascar)
▼ -3 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 33% of 86 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Women in senior and middle management (% of managers)
Ecuador 39.11 · world median 35.86 (better)
Best in the world 56.69 (Nauru)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2014
Middle · top 42% of 179 countries measured
World Bank Group · Firms with a female top manager (%)
Ecuador 21.05 · world median 19.16 (better)
Best in the world 62.9 (Kiribati)
No earlier reading to compare
Lower middle · bottom 35% of 168 countries measured
World Bank Group · GDP per person employed (constant 2021 international $)
Ecuador 30,171 · world median 47,384 (worse)
Best in the world 262,554 (Luxembourg)
▼ -6 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 31% of 97 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Informal employment (% of total employment)
Ecuador 67.31 · world median 36.83 (worse)
Best in the world 0.857 (Hungary)
No earlier reading to compare
Upper middle · top 38% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Population aged 15+ in the labour force (%)
Ecuador 64.5 · world median 61.66 (better)
Best in the world 87.01 (Qatar)
▼ -7 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 40% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Output per hour worked (constant 2021 international $ at PPP)
Ecuador 15.57 · world median 22.16 (worse)
Best in the world 164.65 (Ireland)
▼ -3 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 30% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Self-employed (% of total employment)
Ecuador 52.33 · world median 31.84
Highest 91.56 (Chad)
▲ +4 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 28% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Unemployment (% of labour force)
Ecuador 3.308 · world median 5.084 (better)
Best in the world 0.13 (Qatar)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 28% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Vulnerable employment (% of total employment)
Ecuador 50.12 · world median 28.67 (worse)
Best in the world 0.456 (Qatar)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2015
Middle · top 50% of 113 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employed people living in extreme poverty (%)
Ecuador 4.885 · world median 4.885
Best in the world 0.007 (Bhutan)
▼ -8 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 34% of 97 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Youth not in education, employment or training (%)
Ecuador 18.95 · world median 14.31 (worse)
Best in the world 3.975 (Iceland)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2014
Upper middle · top 27% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Unemployment, ages 15-24 (% of youth labour force)
Ecuador 8.16 · world median 12.83 (better)
Best in the world 0.457 (Niger)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2015
Middle · bottom 47% of 172 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Adults 15+ who can read and write (%)
Ecuador 93.49 · world median 93.99 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (3 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
Upper middle · top 36% of 195 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Expected years of schooling
Ecuador 14.85 · world median 13.34 (better)
Best in the world 21.69 (Monaco)
No real change since 2013
Middle · bottom 42% of 193 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Mean years of schooling (adults 25+)
Ecuador 8.97 · world median 9.933 (worse)
Best in the world 14.3 (Germany)
No real change since 2013
Upper middle · top 26% of 165 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Primary completion rate (%)
Ecuador 99.5 · world median 97.43 (better)
Best in the world 100 (5 countries tied)
▲ +25 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 34% of 95 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Adults 25+ who completed upper secondary or higher (%)
Ecuador 45.9 · world median 65.76 (worse)
Best in the world 97.89 (Belarus)
▲ +4 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 38% of 164 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Upper secondary completion rate (%)
Ecuador 77.69 · world median 64.87 (better)
Best in the world 99.27 (South Korea)
▲ +3 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 38% of 174 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · 15–24 year-olds who can read and write (%)
Ecuador 98.99 · world median 98.22 (better)
Best in the world 100 (6 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
Lower middle · bottom 34% of 86 countries measured
UNICEF · Births attended by skilled health staff (%)
Ecuador 97.2 · world median 98.8 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (11 countries tied)
▲ +21 percentile points since 2009
Lower middle · bottom 26% of 155 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Dietary energy supply (kcal per person per day)
Ecuador 2,651 · world median 2,982 (worse)
Best in the world 3,962 (United States)
▼ -2 percentile points since 2014
Middle · bottom 45% of 136 countries measured
UNICEF · Infants under 6 months exclusively breastfed (%)
Ecuador 39.6 · world median 40.74 (worse)
Best in the world 83.3 (Burundi)
No earlier reading to compare
Middle · bottom 49% of 172 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · GII (0 = full equality, 1 = maximum inequality)
Ecuador 0.358 · world median 0.351 (worse)
Best in the world 0.003 (Denmark)
▲ +3 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 25% of 109 countries measured
Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) · MPI (0–1)
Ecuador 0.008 · world median 0.039 (better)
Best in the world 0 (Serbia)
No real change since 2018
Bottom fifth · bottom 17% of 209 countries measured · 209 share 206 positions
Small Arms Survey · Violent deaths per 100,000 people
Ecuador 16.13 · world median 4.02 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (4 countries tied)
No real change since 2011
Middle · top 43% of 172 countries measured
World Bank Group · HCI score (0–1)
Ecuador 0.594 · world median 0.564 (better)
Best in the world 0.879 (Singapore)
▲ +30 percentile points since 2010
Middle · top 45% of 193 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · HDI score (0–1)
Ecuador 0.777 · world median 0.762 (better)
Best in the world 0.972 (Iceland)
No real change since 2013
Lower middle · bottom 36% of 81 countries measured
ACAPS · INFORM Severity (1–5, most severe crisis)
Ecuador 3.5 · world median 3.1 (worse)
Best in the world 1.3 (Trinidad and Tobago)
▼ -48 percentile points since 2020
Upper middle · top 36% of 222 countries measured
UN DESA Population Division · Years a newborn would live at current death rates
Ecuador 77.39 · world median 74.63 (better)
Best in the world 86.37 (Monaco)
No real change since 2013
Middle · bottom 47% of 195 countries measured
UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group (MMEIG) · Maternal deaths per 100,000 live births
Ecuador 55.37 · world median 46.65 (worse)
Best in the world 0.11 (Cook Islands)
No real change since 2013
Top fifth · top 16% of 181 countries measured · 181 share 178 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Pesticide use (kg per hectare of cropland)
Ecuador 9.81 · world median 1.73
Highest 37.72 (Antigua and Barbuda)
▼ -8 percentile points since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 29% of 133 countries measured · 133 share 127 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Population in severe food insecurity (%)
Ecuador 11.9 · world median 4.7 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (7 countries tied)
▼ -6 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 28% of 165 countries measured · 165 share 104 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Population undernourished (%)
Ecuador 12.1 · world median 5.2 (worse)
Best in the world 2.5 (62 countries tied)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2013
Middle · bottom 43% of 162 countries measured
UNICEF, WHO and World Bank Group (Joint Malnutrition Estimates) · Children under 5 who are stunted (%)
Ecuador 17.45 · world median 13.8 (worse)
Best in the world 0.518 (Latvia)
No earlier reading to compare
Middle · top 45% of 200 countries measured
UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME) · Deaths before age five (per 1,000 live births)
Ecuador 12.88 · world median 14.54 (better)
Best in the world 1.26 (San Marino)
No real change since 2014
Lower middle · bottom 36% of 215 countries measured
World Bank Group · Population with electricity access (%)
Ecuador 98.5 · world median 100 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (122 countries tied)
▼ -11 percentile points since 2014
Top fifth · top 11% of 121 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Irrigated share of agricultural land (%)
Ecuador 21.12 · world median 3.66
Highest 89.04 (Bangladesh)
No earlier reading to compare
Lower middle · bottom 29% of 206 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Arable land (hectares per person)
Ecuador 0.057 · world median 0.109
Highest 1.459 (Kazakhstan)
▼ -3 percentile points since 2013
Middle · bottom 48% of 161 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Share of the cereal supply that is imported (%)
Ecuador 39.6 · world median 42.8
Highest 100 (16 countries tied)
▲ +4 percentile points since 2012
Middle · bottom 41% of 145 countries measured · 145 share 143 positions
UNICEF · Women 20–24 married before 18 (%)
Ecuador 22.2 · world median 17.1 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (3 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
Middle · top 49% of 169 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Coefficient of Human Inequality (%)
Ecuador 17.02 · world median 17.05 (better)
Best in the world 4.865 (Slovenia)
No real change since 2013
Upper middle · top 32% of 93 countries measured
World Bank Group · Average cost of sending $200 home (% of the amount)
Ecuador 2.296 · world median 3.225 (better)
Best in the world -49.69 (Malawi)
▼ -23 percentile points since 2016
Top fifth · top 3% of 184 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Gender Development Index (1.000 = parity)
Ecuador 0.998 · world median 0.971 (better)
Best in the world 1 (2 countries tied)
▲ +27 percentile points since 2013
Middle · bottom 50% of 180 countries measured · 180 share 179 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Land under cereal production (hectares)
Ecuador 684,385 · world median 689,278
Highest 103,715,108 (India)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 28% of 156 countries measured · 156 share 150 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Organic share of agricultural land (%)
Ecuador 3.59 · world median 0.725 (better)
Best in the world 86.38 (Samoa)
▲ +15 percentile points since 2014
Upper middle · top 26% of 156 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · PHDI (0–1)
Ecuador 0.735 · world median 0.678 (better)
Best in the world 0.827 (United Kingdom)
▲ +6 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 27% of 173 countries measured · 173 share 171 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Freshwater withdrawn for agriculture (% of total)
Ecuador 81.43 · world median 62.14
Highest 99.48 (Somalia)
No real change since 2012
Middle · top 42% of 198 countries measured · 198 share 193 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Farm-gate emissions (kt CO₂eq)
Ecuador 12,252 · world median 8,635
Highest 1,044,508 (India)
▼ -7 percentile points since 2013
Upper middle · top 25% of 213 countries measured · 213 share 210 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Forest area (% of land area)
Ecuador 49.55 · world median 31.08
Highest 94.45 (Suriname)
No real change since 2013
Middle · top 49% of 160 countries measured
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) · New displacements by disaster (people)
Ecuador 4,400 · world median 4,750 (better)
Best in the world 1 (Serbia)
▼ -35 percentile points since 2014
Top fifth · top 14% of 181 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Renewable internal freshwater (cubic metres per person)
Ecuador 24,821 · world median 2,528 (better)
Best in the world 445,023 (Iceland)
No real change since 2012
Upper middle · top 21% of 193 countries measured · 193 share 190 positions
Ember · Renewables (% of electricity generated)
Ecuador 72.44 · world median 31.14 (better)
Best in the world 100 (7 countries tied)
▲ +9 percentile points since 2014
Top fifth · top 11% of 177 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Freshwater withdrawal as a share of available resources (%)
Ecuador 1.14 · world median 10 (better)
Best in the world 0.03 (Republic of the Congo)
▲ +7 percentile points since 2013
Bottom fifth · bottom 9% of 193 countries measured
Institute for International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict (IFHV), Ruhr University Bochum · WorldRiskIndex score (0–100, where 100 is the most at risk)
Ecuador 24.14 · world median 4.17 (worse)
Best in the world 0.18 (Monaco)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2015
Upper middle · top 26% of 140 countries measured
OECD · SIGI score (0 = no discrimination, 100 = absolute)
Ecuador 17 · world median 25.2 (better)
Best in the world 6.7 (Norway)
No earlier reading to compare
Bottom fifth · bottom 12% of 196 countries measured · 196 share 59 positions
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) · Deaths in organized violence (people)
Ecuador 439 · world median 0 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (138 countries tied)
▼ -52 percentile points since 2015
Middle · top 47% of 149 countries measured
Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies (BICC) · GMI score (higher means a heavier military weight)
Ecuador 95.59 · world median 100.66 (better)
Best in the world 3.512 (Haiti)
▲ +5 percentile points since 2013
Lower middle · bottom 21% of 191 countries measured
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · INFORM Risk score (0–10, where 10 is the highest risk)
Ecuador 5.5 · world median 3.7 (worse)
Best in the world 0.7 (Singapore)
▼ -10 percentile points since 2016
Lower middle · bottom 35% of 176 countries measured
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Freedom from political killings and torture (0–1)
Ecuador 0.59 · world median 0.79 (worse)
Best in the world 0.989 (2 countries tied)
▼ -31 percentile points since 2015
Lower middle · bottom 20% of 211 countries measured
World Bank Group · Political Stability estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)
Ecuador -0.721 · world median 0.04 (worse)
Best in the world 1.582 (Liechtenstein)
▼ -26 percentile points since 2014
The newest edition of these reports does not include Ecuador. Usually the publisher does not cover it; sometimes it has dropped out of a ranking it used to appear in.
07Keep reading
08Method
How a standing is built from percentiles, why Ecuador can move because other countries moved, and why publishers measure between 120 and 215 countries each are set out in full in how a standing is made and what a standing cannot tell you.
The photograph of Ecuador on this page comes from Wikimedia Commons and is shown in greyscale. The photographer and the licence are named beside each one.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Ecuador: country statistics, rankings and trends. https://nationsinquiry.com/countries/ecuador