Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

World Bank Group · Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance Score

Regulatory governance by country

How openly does a government make the rules that businesses must follow?

Of the 186 countries compared in 2018, 16 countries shared the highest reading, 5.0, and 13 countries shared the lowest reading, 0.0. In the middle country the figure was 2.3.

Share

Part ofGovernance & Institutions

Regulatory governance · 2018

Context statistic

16 countries share the highest value, 5.0 — no single country is named first.

012018 · values only

Who leads

The three countries at the highest end of 186 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

Highest in 2018 · shared

16 countries share the highest reading, 5.0

No single country is named first: picking one from a shared value would be a choice the data does not make.

Lowest in 2018

  1. Yemen0.0
  2. Vanuatu0.0
  3. Syria0.0

Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Highest on each continent

02Every measured country

Regulatory governance on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a higher value — the better end.

  • 0.0–1.0
  • 1.3–1.8
  • 2.0–3.3
  • 3.5–4.5
  • 4.8–5.0
  • No reading in 2018
  • Europe

    4.5

    the middle country, of 41 measured · 49 members

    8 share 5.0

    San Marino2.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Europe.

  • Asia

    2.8

    the middle country, of 47 measured · 52 members

    4 share 5.0

    4 share 0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Asia.

  • Americas

    1.9

    the middle country, of 34 measured · 48 members

    4 share 5.0

    3 share 0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Americas.

  • Africa

    1.3

    the middle country, of 52 measured · 55 members

    2 share 4.0

    5 share 0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Africa.

  • Oceania

    1.3

    the middle country, of 12 measured · 21 members

    New Zealand4.3

    Vanuatu0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.

22 sub-regions, highest middle country first
  • Eastern Asia

    5.0

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 8 members

    4 share 5.0

    China1.8

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Northern Europe

    4.6

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members

    3 share 5.0

    Latvia3.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.

  • Western Europe

    4.5

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members

    2 share 5.0

    Belgium3.8

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.

  • Eastern Europe

    4.4

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members

    2 share 5.0

    Ukraine3.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Southern Europe

    4.4

    the middle country, of 14 measured · 17 members

    Croatia5.0

    San Marino2.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.

  • South-eastern Asia

    2.8

    the middle country, of 11 measured · 11 members

    Thailand4.5

    Brunei1.0

    Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • South America

    2.5

    the middle country, of 11 measured · 12 members

    Colombia4.3

    Ecuador0.5

    Highest and lowest reading in South America.

  • Central America

    1.9

    the middle country, of 8 measured · 8 members

    2 share 5.0

    Guatemala0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Central America.

  • Western Asia

    1.9

    the middle country, of 18 measured · 19 members

    2 share 4.0

    4 share 0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.

  • Southern Asia

    1.6

    the middle country, of 8 measured · 9 members

    India3.5

    3 share 1.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Caribbean

    1.5

    the middle country, of 13 measured · 24 members

    Jamaica3.0

    2 share 0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.

  • Eastern Africa

    1.5

    the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members

    2 share 3.3

    Eritrea0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Northern Africa

    1.3

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members

    Morocco4.0

    Libya0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Southern Africa

    1.3

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members

    South Africa4.0

    Lesotho0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.

  • Western Africa

    1.3

    the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members

    Nigeria2.8

    Liberia0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.

  • Middle Africa

    1.0

    the middle country, of 8 measured · 9 members

    Angola1.8

    Central African Republic0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    New Zealand4.3

    Australia3.8

    Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Central Asia

    4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan.

    Kazakhstan4.8

    Tajikistan2.8

    Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.

  • Melanesia

    4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.

    Solomon Islands2.3

    Vanuatu0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.

  • Micronesia

    4 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Palau.

    Kiribati1.0

    Palau0.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Micronesia.

  • Northern America

    2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.

    2 share 5.0

    2 share 5.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.

  • Polynesia

    2 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Samoa, Tonga.

    Tonga1.8

    Samoa1.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Polynesia.

03The whole field at once

The spread

186 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 2.3; a quarter are above 4.0, and a quarter below 1.1. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

012345Africa52 comparedMorocco: 4.0South Africa: 4.0Kenya: 3.3Uganda: 3.3Mozambique: 2.8Nigeria: 2.8Madagascar: 2.5Rwanda: 2.5Tunisia: 2.5Niger: 2.3Zambia: 2.0Angola: 1.8Cabo Verde: 1.8Togo: 1.8Benin: 1.5Botswana: 1.5Comoros: 1.5Côte d’Ivoire: 1.5Egypt: 1.5Mauritius: 1.5Zimbabwe: 1.5Cameroon: 1.3Gambia: 1.3Malawi: 1.3Mali: 1.3Namibia: 1.3Republic of the Congo: 1.3Senegal: 1.3Algeria: 1.0Burkina Faso: 1.0Burundi: 1.0Chad: 1.0Djibouti: 1.0DR Congo: 1.0Eswatini: 1.0Ethiopia: 1.0Ghana: 1.0Guinea: 1.0Sierra Leone: 1.0Tanzania: 1.0Sudan: 0.8Gabon: 0.5Guinea-Bissau: 0.5Mauritania: 0.5São Tomé and Príncipe: 0.5Seychelles: 0.5South Sudan: 0.5Central African Republic: 0.0Eritrea: 0.0Lesotho: 0.0Liberia: 0.0Libya: 0.0Central African Republic 0.0South Africa 4.0Americas34 comparedCanada: 5.0Costa Rica: 5.0Mexico: 5.0United States: 5.0Colombia: 4.3Brazil: 3.8Chile: 3.3Bolivia: 3.0Jamaica: 3.0Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: 2.8Barbados: 2.5Nicaragua: 2.5Peru: 2.5Uruguay: 2.5Argentina: 2.3Panama: 2.3Saint Lucia: 2.0Trinidad and Tobago: 1.8Belize: 1.5Dominica: 1.5Dominican Republic: 1.5Paraguay: 1.5Puerto Rico: 1.5Antigua and Barbuda: 1.3Bahamas: 1.3Grenada: 1.3El Salvador: 1.0Guyana: 1.0Honduras: 1.0Suriname: 1.0Ecuador: 0.5Guatemala: 0.0Haiti: 0.0Saint Kitts and Nevis: 0.0Guatemala 0.0United States 5.0Asia47 comparedHong Kong: 5.0Japan: 5.0South Korea: 5.0Taiwan: 5.0Kazakhstan: 4.8Thailand: 4.5Malaysia: 4.3Armenia: 4.0Cyprus: 4.0Georgia: 3.8Kyrgyzstan: 3.8Mongolia: 3.8Uzbekistan: 3.8India: 3.5Israel: 3.5Singapore: 3.5Indonesia: 3.3United Arab Emirates: 3.3Azerbaijan: 3.0Bhutan: 3.0Laos: 3.0Philippines: 2.8Tajikistan: 2.8Vietnam: 2.8Türkiye: 2.5Timor-Leste: 2.3Bahrain: 2.0Jordan: 2.0Myanmar: 2.0Cambodia: 1.8China: 1.8Nepal: 1.8Pakistan: 1.8Palestine: 1.8Bangladesh: 1.5Iraq: 1.5Lebanon: 1.3Oman: 1.3Afghanistan: 1.0Brunei: 1.0Iran: 1.0Kuwait: 1.0Sri Lanka: 1.0Qatar: 0.0Saudi Arabia: 0.0Syria: 0.0Yemen: 0.0Qatar 0.0Taiwan 5.0Europe41 comparedAustria: 5.0Bulgaria: 5.0Croatia: 5.0Estonia: 5.0Norway: 5.0Poland: 5.0Switzerland: 5.0United Kingdom: 5.0Denmark: 4.8Hungary: 4.8Iceland: 4.8Italy: 4.8Kosovo: 4.8Moldova: 4.8Netherlands: 4.8Russia: 4.8Slovenia: 4.8Spain: 4.8France: 4.5Germany: 4.5Luxembourg: 4.5Malta: 4.5Serbia: 4.5Sweden: 4.5Ireland: 4.3Montenegro: 4.3Czechia: 4.0Finland: 4.0Greece: 4.0Lithuania: 4.0Slovakia: 4.0Belgium: 3.8North Macedonia: 3.8Albania: 3.5Belarus: 3.5Bosnia and Herzegovina: 3.5Portugal: 3.5Romania: 3.5Latvia: 3.0Ukraine: 3.0San Marino: 2.3San Marino 2.3United Kingdom 5.0Oceania12 comparedNew Zealand: 4.3Australia: 3.8Solomon Islands: 2.3Tonga: 1.8Fiji: 1.5Papua New Guinea: 1.5Kiribati: 1.0Samoa: 1.0Marshall Islands: 0.5Micronesia: 0.5Palau: 0.3Vanuatu: 0.0Vanuatu 0.0New Zealand 4.3middle country 2.3

04All 186 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first. No rank or position is shown: too many countries share the same value for an order to mean anything. The score records whether each practice exists, not how well it works, and it moves in quarter-point steps — many countries share the same score, at both ends, so no positions are shown. The figures date from 2017–18 and have not been updated.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 186 countries

  1. AustriaWestern Europe5.0
  2. BulgariaEastern Europe5.0
  3. CanadaNorthern America5.0
  4. Costa RicaCentral America5.0
  5. CroatiaSouthern Europe5.0
  6. EstoniaNorthern Europe5.0
  7. Hong KongEastern Asia5.0
  8. JapanEastern Asia5.0
  9. MexicoCentral America5.0
  10. NorwayNorthern Europe5.0
  11. PolandEastern Europe5.0
  12. South KoreaEastern Asia5.0
  13. SwitzerlandWestern Europe5.0
  14. TaiwanEastern Asia5.0
  15. United KingdomNorthern Europe5.0
  16. United StatesNorthern America5.0
  17. DenmarkNorthern Europe4.8
  18. HungaryEastern Europe4.8
  19. IcelandNorthern Europe4.8
  20. ItalySouthern Europe4.8
  21. KazakhstanCentral Asia4.8
  22. KosovoSouthern Europe4.8
  23. MoldovaEastern Europe4.8
  24. NetherlandsWestern Europe4.8
  25. RussiaEastern Europe4.8

Values for 2018.

05In this edition

Regulatory governance in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

  • Highest reading

    Reached 16 times by 16 countries — shared, so no holder is named

    5.0

    Regulatory governance score (0–5, where 5 is the most transparent rule-making)

    World Bank Group · 2018

  • Lowest reading

    Reached 13 times by 13 countries — shared, so no holder is named

    0.0

    Regulatory governance score (0–5, where 5 is the most transparent rule-making)

    World Bank Group · 2018

06The parts of the index

Inside the number

World Bank Group publishes the parts the headline is built from. Each part’s highest and lowest country, and its middle value.

PartHighestLowestMiddle country
Forward regulatory plans (0–1)186 countries53 countries share 1.0101 countries share 0.00.0
Consultation on proposed regulations (0–1)186 countries57 countries share 1.050 countries share 0.00.5
Reporting back on consultations (0–1)186 countries39 countries share 1.0100 countries share 0.00.0
Regulatory impact assessment (0–1)186 countries47 countries share 1.099 countries share 0.00.0
Access to the laws in force (0–1)186 countries140 countries share 1.025 countries share 0.01.0

07The measure

About regulatory governance

This score, from the World Bank's Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance, rates how openly a government makes the rules businesses must follow: whether it publishes plans for new regulation, consults the public on drafts, reports back on what it heard, assesses the likely impact, and makes the laws in force easy to find. Each of the five practices scores up to one point, for a total out of five.

What the number is: Regulatory governance score (0–5, where 5 is the most transparent rule-making).

08Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Governance & Institutions, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

Governance & InstitutionsWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where regulatory governance is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where regulatory governance is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 381 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

10Questions

Regulatory governance: questions and answers

Which country has the highest regulatory governance?

16 countries share the highest reading, 5.0, among the 186 compared in 2018, so no single country is named.

Which country has the lowest regulatory governance?

13 countries share the lowest reading, 0.0, among the 186 compared in 2018, so no single country is named.

How many countries does the Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance Score cover?

186 in 2018.

What is the world average regulatory governance?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 186 compared in 2018, the figure was 2.3.

Is this World Bank Group’s own ranking?

No ranking is shown. World Bank Group publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything, so none is derived.

How often is the Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance Score published?

This site holds one edition, describing 2018.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From World Bank Group, under CC BY 4.0. From World Bank Data360 (Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance). The five parts beside the score are the Bank's own and add up to it. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

11Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance Score — World Bank Group

From World Bank Data360 (Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance). The five parts beside the score are the Bank's own and add up to it.

Newest edition

Report year 2018Data year 2018

Cite the source as: World Bank. Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-10-03.

The full 2018 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • No rank or position is shown: World Bank Group publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Regulatory governance by country: Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance Score, data from World Bank Group. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/regulatory-governance

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.