Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home
A view of Libya

Photo: Maher A. A. Abdussalam · CC0 · via Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale

Libya places highest on Mobile Phone Ownership (top 1% worldwide) and lowest on FDI Regulatory Restrictiveness Index (bottom 1%).

Share

Libya in the Nations Inquiry Country Index

At a glance

The newest published figure for each, the year it describes and who published it, with a line showing how it has moved.

01The country

About Libya

Almost all of Libya is Sahara, and not one permanent river crosses it. Life gathers along the Mediterranean, on the plains of Tripolitania and on the Jebel Akhdar, the ‘Green Mountain’ of Cyrenaica, which catches enough winter rain for farms. Inland lie the sand seas of Fezzan, the mud-walled old town of Ghadames, and the Akakus mountains, whose rock paintings show giraffes and cattle grazing a green Sahara.

Phoenicians founded Leptis Magna, Sabratha and Oea, the city that became Tripoli, and Greeks from Thera settled Cyrene around 631 BC. Septimius Severus, born at Leptis Magna, made it one of Rome’s grandest African cities. Arab armies arrived in the 640s, and Ottoman rule began in 1551. Italy invaded in 1911, and Omar Mukhtar led resistance in Cyrenaica until he was hanged in 1931. Libya became independent under King Idris in 1951, oil was found in 1959, and Muammar Gaddafi ruled from 1969 until his overthrow in 2011.

Most Libyans are Sunni Arabs; Amazigh communities keep their own speech in the Nafusa Mountains, and Tuareg and Tebu peoples live in the deep south, where Ibrahim al-Koni sets his novels. Bazeen, a dome of barley dough in a spicy lamb stew, is shared from a common bowl, and sweet tea is poured from a height to raise a froth. Oil from the Sirte Basin leaves through terminals at Es Sider, Ras Lanuf and Brega, and gas flows under the sea to Sicily.

Map showing the location of Libya
Where Libya is

Key facts about Libya

Capital
Tripoli
Official languages
Arabic, Modern Standard Arabic
Currency
Libyan dinar (LYD)
ISO code
LBY · LY
Domain · dialling
.ly · +218

As Wikidata records them. Official languages are the least consistent — some countries list only a national language, others every regional one. Sources and licences.

02Country Index 2026

Where it stands, topic by topic

Strongest first. Each position is Libya’s place among the countries with a standing on that topic, built from a few key statistics chosen to measure different things.

All topics

Each standing is built from a few key statistics chosen to measure different things. Select a subject for Libya’s readings on it, or see every statistic held for Libya in the table further down this page.

03Highs and lows

Where Libya stands out

The two ends of its own record: every statistic on which Libya sits within ten places of the best or worst in the world, plus its strongest and weakest readings overall. Each is turned into a percentile — its place among every country measured — which is what lets a hunger score and a press-freedom rank be compared at all.

Where Libya does best6

In the top third of all countries measured. 4 are within ten places of the best in the world, in a field of at least 50 countries — marked with that place.

  1. 1st

    Position · derived 1st of 140 · 100 · 2024

    world median 91.68 (better)

  2. 1st

    Position · derived 59th of 59 · 1 = worst · 0 · 2025

    world median 0 · ▲ 60 pts since 2015

  3. 2nd

    Position · derived 2nd of 98 · 80.86 · 2024

    world median 53.85 (better)

  4. 2nd

    Position · derived 2nd of 186 · 13.37 · 2025

    world median 3.396 (better) · ▲ 91 pts since 2015

  5. Position · derived 139th of 156 · 1 = worst · 2.1 · 2024

    world median 4.4 (better)

  6. Not ranked by the publisher · 193.31 · 2023

    world median 102.69 (better)

Where Libya struggles most10 of 24

In the bottom third of all countries measured. 23 are within ten places of the worst in the world, in a field of at least 50 countries — marked with that place.

  1. 1st

    Position · derived 1st of 104 · 1 = worst · 0.567 · 2024

    world median 0.079 (worse)

  2. 1st

    Rank 139th of 139 · 1.9 · 2023

    world median 2.9 (worse) · ▼ 26 pts since 2014

  3. 2nd

    Position · derived 161st of 162 · 0.029 · 2024

    world median 37.32 (worse) · ▼ 15 pts since 2014

  4. 2nd

    Position · derived 175th of 176 · -2.358 · 2025

    world median 0.309 (worse) · ▼ 2 pts since 2015

  5. 2nd

    Position · derived 161st of 162 · 0.029 · 2024

    world median 32.06 (worse) · ▼ 15 pts since 2014

  6. 3rd

    Position · derived 174th of 176 · -2.065 · 2025

    world median 0.196 (worse) · ▼ 5 pts since 2015

  7. 4th

    Position · derived 4th of 91 · 1 = worst · 99.72 · 2023

    world median 91.81 (worse)

  8. 4th
    Water Stressbottom 2%

    Position · derived 4th of 177 · 1 = worst · 817.14 · 2023

    world median 10 (worse)

  9. 4th

    Position · derived 4th of 182 · 1 = worst · 50.06 · 2025

    world median 12.83 (worse)

  10. 5th

    Rank 177th of 181 · 13 · 2025

    world median 39 (worse)

14 more in every statistic for Libya.

A band is a place among the countries each publisher scores, so Libya can move because other countries moved. See the Country Index for the full method.

05In context

Libya and its neighbours

A position reads best beside the countries around it. Every position below is a place in the world ranking of 183, not within the region.

Northern Africa

Across Northern Africa

Every country in the sub-region, by its position in the world (of 183 placed).

  1. =104Tunisia
  2. =113Morocco
  3. 116Egypt
  4. 146Algeria
  5. 174Libya
  6. 179Sudan

06The evidence

Every statistic we hold for Libya

Grouped by topic. Each row gives the newest edition’s rank or position, the published value and the year the numbers describe. Select a statistic for this country’s row beside every other country, the world median and every edition.

All statistics

Governance & Institutions33

  • Central Bank Independence IndexAna Carolina Garriga, University of Essex · CBI index (0–1, where 1 is the most statutory independence)bottom 11%0.3712023
  • Child and Family Benefit CoverageILO · Children or households with children receiving child or family cash benefits (%)top 31%55.32024
  • Civic Space RatingsCIVICUS · Civic space score (0–100)153rd of 198position · derived272025
  • Climate Readiness (ND-GAIN)Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND-GAIN), University of Notre Dame · ND-GAIN Readiness (0–1, where 1 is the most ready)153rd of 192rank0.292024
  • Completeness of Birth RegistrationUNICEF · Children under 5 whose birth is registered (%)top 38%99.62025
  • Control of CorruptionWorld Bank Group · Control of Corruption (−2.5 to 2.5)201st of 211position · derived-1.532025
  • Corruption Perceptions IndexTransparency International · CPI score (0–100, where 100 is very clean)177th of 181rank132025
  • Disability Benefit CoverageILO · People with severe disabilities receiving disability benefits (%)top 35%84.32025
  • Equal Protection IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Equal protection index (0–1); higher = rights and freedoms protected more equally across social groups and classes130th of 176position · derived0.4262025
  • Foundational ID OwnershipWorld Bank Group (ID4D) · Adults who own a foundational ID (% of population aged 15+)top 50%94.42024
  • General Government ConsumptionWorld Bank Group · General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)4th of 132position · derived32.272025
  • Global Indicators of Regulatory Governance ScoreWorld Bank Group · Regulatory governance score (0–5, where 5 is the most transparent rule-making)bottom 3%02018
  • Government AI Readiness IndexOxford Insights · AI readiness score (0–100)134th of 195rank28.382025
  • Government EffectivenessWorld Bank Group · Governance estimate (−2.5 weak to 2.5 strong)198th of 209position · derived-1.4892025
  • GovTech Maturity IndexWorld Bank Group · GTMI score (0–1)171st of 196position · derived0.2042025
  • Judicial Constraints on the Executive IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Judicial constraints on the executive index (0–1)129th of 175position · derived0.2542025
  • Liberal Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Liberal democracy index (0–1)144th of 176position · derived0.0982025
  • Meritocratic Appointment in the State AdministrationV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −2.9 to +3.6); higher = more appointments on merit175th of 176position · derived-2.3582025
  • Neopatrimonial Rule IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Neopatrimonial rule index (0–1; higher = more personalised rule)51st of 176position · derived · 1 = worst0.7212025
  • Old-Age Pension CoverageILO · People above statutory pensionable age receiving an old-age pension (%)bottom 50%79.42025
  • Open Data InventoryOpen Data Watch · ODIN overall score (0–100)162nd of 168rank282024
  • Political Corruption IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Political corruption index (0–1; higher = more corrupt)29th of 176position · derived · 1 = worst0.8112025
  • Regulatory QualityWorld Bank Group · Regulatory Quality (−2.5 to 2.5)201st of 209position · derived-1.6642025
  • Rigorous and Impartial Public AdministrationV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +4.0); higher = a more rigorous and impartial administration169th of 176position · derived-2.3662025
  • Rule of LawWorld Bank Group · Rule of Law estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)200th of 211position · derived-1.6492025
  • Social Protection CoverageILO · Population covered by at least one social protection benefit (%)top 36%66.12025
  • State Authority over TerritoryV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Territory under effective state control (% of official territory)bottom 3%65.62025
  • State Capacity IndexJonathan K. Hanson (University of Michigan) and Rachel Sigman (Naval Postgraduate School) · Latent estimate of state capacity (≈ −2.3 to +3.0, centred near 0); higher = a more capable state162nd of 166position · derived-1.3522015
  • State Fiscal Source of RevenueV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −2.9 to +3.1); higher = broader taxation149th of 176position · derived-0.2482025
  • Statistical Performance IndicatorsWorld Bank Group · SPI overall score (0–100)184th of 188position · derived34.752024
  • V-Dem Electoral Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Electoral democracy index (0–1)139th of 176position · derived0.1932025
  • Voice and AccountabilityWorld Bank Group · Voice and Accountability estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)178th of 206position · derived-1.442025
  • Women, Business and the LawWorld Bank Group · WBL Index (0–100, where 100 is full legal parity)179th of 190position · derived502025

Economy & Innovation32

Work & Labour19

Education & Knowledge6

  • Academic Freedom IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Academic freedom index (0–1)129th of 176position · derived0.2822025
  • Adult Literacy RateUIS · Adults 15+ who can read and write (%)153rd of 172position · derived60.162024
  • Expected Years of SchoolingUNDP Human Development Report Office · Expected years of schooling116th of 195position · derived12.922023
  • Female Share of ResearchersUIS · Researchers who are women (% of headcount; 50 = parity)bottom 17%24.752024
  • Mean Years of SchoolingUNDP Human Development Report Office · Mean years of schooling (adults 25+)128th of 193position · derived7.7792023
  • Youth Literacy RateUIS · 15–24 year-olds who can read and write (%)bottom 23%89.342024

Health & Wellbeing44

Development & Human Capital6

Environment & Sustainability37

Gender & Equality5

Democracy & Civil Liberties16

  • Deliberative Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Deliberative democracy index (0–1)102nd of 176position · derived0.2612025
  • Egalitarian Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Egalitarian democracy index (0–1)149th of 176position · derived0.1232025
  • Exclusion by Socio-Economic GroupV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Exclusion by socio-economic group index (0–1; higher = more exclusion)43rd of 174position · derived · 1 = worst0.6092023
  • Freedom of Expression and Alternative Sources of Information IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Freedom of expression index (0–1)119th of 176position · derived0.5362025
  • Freedom of Foreign MovementV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +2.9); higher = freer movement146th of 176position · derived-0.3762025
  • Freedom of Peaceful AssemblyV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.5 to +3.5); higher = more freedom116th of 172position · derived-0.142025
  • Freedom of ReligionV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.5 to +3); higher = more religious freedom159th of 176position · derived-1.2212025
  • Government Censorship of the MediaV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3 to +3.5); higher = less censorship107th of 176position · derived0.0612025
  • Government Dissemination of False Information (Domestic)V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +3.2); higher = less disinformation107th of 176position · derived-0.5562025
  • Government Internet ShutdownsV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −4 to +2); higher = fewer shutdowns156th of 176position · derived-1.4232025
  • Government Social Media CensorshipV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −4.5 to +2.4); higher = less censorship109th of 176position · derived-0.0932025
  • Mass MobilizationV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +4); higher = more and larger eventstop 42%0.4342025
  • Military Dimension IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Military dimension index (0–1; higher = larger military role)bottom 24%0.252025
  • Participatory Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Participatory democracy index (0–1)151st of 176position · derived0.0872025
  • Physical Violence IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Freedom from political killings and torture (0–1)163rd of 176position · derived0.1552025
  • Political PolarizationV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.8 to +3.9); higher = more polarized10th of 172position · derived · 1 = worst2.4762025

Peace & Security12

Risk & Resilience7

Mobility & Trade8

Money & Public Finance2

Energy9

Digital & Technology7

  • AI User Share of the Working-Age PopulationMicrosoft AI Economy Institute · Generative-AI users (% of population aged 15–64)top 49%15.52026
  • GitHub DevelopersGitHub · Developer accounts located in the economy (as of quarter end)bottom 48%73,6652026
  • GitHub Git PushesGitHub · Git pushes during the quarterbottom 29%45,8752025
  • GitHub RepositoriesGitHub · Public repositories located in the economy (as of quarter end)bottom 39%61,2372026
  • Internet Use Among AdultsWorld Bank Group · Adults who used the internet in the past three months (% of population aged 15+)79th of 140position · derived80.512024
  • Mobile Phone OwnershipWorld Bank Group · Adults who own a mobile phone (% of population aged 15+)1st of 140position · derived1002024
  • Smartphone OwnershipWorld Bank Group · Adults whose main mobile phone is a smartphone (% of population aged 15+)95th of 140position · derived65.752024

People & Population14

07Method

Sources and how to read them

How to read this page

  • The scores and ranks belong to their publishers. Nothing is adjusted, rescaled or re-ranked; each is reproduced from the edition named beside it. Where a row says position · derived, the publisher ranks nobody on that measure and the position is ours, made by ordering the published score.
  • Each statistic shows its newest edition, which is not always the edition the Country Index uses: the index pins every source to one data year so its average compares like with like.

How a standing is built from percentiles, why Libya can move because other countries moved, and why publishers measure between 120 and 215 countries each are set out in full in how a standing is made and what a standing cannot tell you.

Sources

  • Statistics: 50 publishers, each named beside its numbers, with every edition and licence on the datasets pages.
  • Capital, languages, currency, codes: Wikidata, public domain (CC0).
  • Map and land borders: Natural Earth, public domain. Borders are de facto — where administration actually changes — not claimed.

Photographs

The photograph of Libya on this page comes from Wikimedia Commons and is shown in greyscale. The photographer and the licence are named beside each one.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Libya: country statistics, rankings and trends. https://nationsinquiry.com/countries/libya

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.