Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
World Bank Group · Logistics Performance Index
How easily do goods move across a country's borders?
Singapore placed first of the 139 countries compared in 2023, at 4.3, and 2 countries shared last place, at 1.9. In the middle country the figure was 2.9. Among the 107 countries measured in every edition since 2007, the middle one moved from 2.9 to 3.1.
Logistics Performance Index · 2023
Key statistic · Mobility & Connectivity
Highest of 139Singapore
4.3012023 · World Bank Group’s rank
The three countries at the highest end of 139 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: Khairul Nizam . · CC BY 2.0, greyscale
2Photo: Joonas Lyytinen · CC BY-SA 2.5, greyscale
3Photo: Simon Koopmann derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 2.0 de, greyscale
Ranks out of 139. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a higher value — the better end.
3.5
the middle country, of 39 measured · 49 members
Finland4.2
2 share 2.5
Highest and lowest reading in Europe.
3.2
the middle country, of 38 measured · 52 members
Singapore4.3
Afghanistan1.9
Highest and lowest reading in Asia.
2.8
the middle country, of 5 measured · 21 members
Australia3.7
Fiji2.3
Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.
2.7
the middle country, of 27 measured · 48 members
Canada4.0
Haiti2.1
Highest and lowest reading in Americas.
2.5
the middle country, of 30 measured · 55 members
South Africa3.7
Libya1.9
Highest and lowest reading in Africa.
4.0
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
3 share 4.1
Luxembourg3.6
Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.
3.8
the middle country, of 6 measured · 8 members
Hong Kong4.0
Mongolia2.5
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.
3.7
the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members
Finland4.2
Lithuania3.4
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.
3.3
the middle country, of 8 measured · 11 members
Singapore4.3
2 share 2.4
Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.
3.3
the middle country, of 12 measured · 17 members
Spain3.9
Albania2.5
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.
3.3
the middle country, of 14 measured · 19 members
United Arab Emirates4.0
Yemen2.2
Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.
3.2
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Poland3.6
Moldova2.5
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.
2.9
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
Panama3.1
Nicaragua2.5
Highest and lowest reading in Central America.
2.8
the middle country, of 10 measured · 12 members
Brazil3.2
Venezuela2.3
Highest and lowest reading in South America.
2.6
the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members
India3.4
Afghanistan1.9
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.
2.5
the middle country, of 8 measured · 24 members
Antigua and Barbuda2.9
Haiti2.1
Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.
2.5
the middle country, of 6 measured · 19 members
Rwanda2.8
Somalia2.0
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.
2.5
the middle country, of 11 measured · 16 members
Benin2.9
3 share 2.3
Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.
2.5
the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members
Republic of the Congo2.6
2 share 2.1
Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
Australia3.7
New Zealand3.6
Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan.
Kazakhstan2.7
Kyrgyzstan2.3
Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.
3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands.
Solomon Islands2.8
Fiji2.3
Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.
4 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Sudan.
Egypt3.1
Libya1.9
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada4.0
United States3.8
Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.
3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Botswana, Namibia, South Africa.
South Africa3.7
Namibia2.9
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.
03The whole field at once
139 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 2.9; a quarter are above 3.5, and a quarter below 2.5. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 170 ever measured
In order, highest value first. “=” marks a rank shared with another country. Both the score and the rank here are the World Bank’s own — nothing is derived. The 2023 edition is published to one decimal, so 139 economies share just 25 distinct scores and many genuinely tie; the Bank resolves those ties itself.
Showing 25 of 170 countries
Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2018 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
052007–2023 · 7 editions
Each point is one survey edition. The five-year gap between 2018 and 2023 is real: the Bank suspended the survey during the pandemic, and the line shows the gap rather than interpolating across it.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 139 | 2.9 | 2.5 – 3.5 | 3.1 |
| 2018 | 160 | 2.7 | 2.4 – 3.2 | 3.0 |
| 2016 | 160 | 2.7 | 2.4 – 3.3 | 3.0 |
| 2014 | 160 | 2.8 | 2.5 – 3.3 | 3.0 |
| 2012 | 155 | 2.8 | 2.5 – 3.2 | 2.9 |
| 2010 | 155 | 2.7 | 2.5 – 3.2 | 2.9 |
| 2007 | 149 | 2.5 | 2.3 – 3.1 | 2.9 |
062018 → 2023
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
134 countries were measured in both 2018 and 2023. The field changed from 160 to 139 countries, so a place can move for reasons that have nothing to do with the country itself.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
4.3
LPI score (1–5)
Lowest reading on record
1.2
LPI score (1–5)
Biggest improvement between editions
+1.0
1.2 → 2.2
Biggest decline between editions
−0.8
2.2 → 1.3
Most improved since first measured
+1.0
1.8 → 2.8
At the top most often
4 of 7
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
The Logistics Performance Index scores how efficiently goods move across and inside a country’s borders — customs, infrastructure, shipment timeliness, tracking — on a 1 to 5 scale, from a survey of the logistics professionals who do it for a living. It is the World Bank’s standard read on trade friction.
What the number is: LPI score (1–5).
What it does not measure
It reflects the views of international freight forwarders, so it describes the routes traders use most, not logistics in every region of a country, and it does not measure the cost of shipping.
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
A key statistic for Mobility & Connectivity
“How efficiently goods actually cross a country's borders, ports and customs.”
Where Logistics Performance Index is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where Logistics Performance Index is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 110 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
Singapore, at 4.3, among the 139 countries compared in 2023.
2 countries share the lowest reading, 1.9, among the 139 compared in 2023, so no single country is named.
139 in 2023, and 170 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 139 to 160 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 139 compared in 2023, the figure was 2.9.
Yes. The rank shown is the one World Bank Group publishes.
This site holds 7 editions, describing 2007 to 2023.
From World Bank Group, under CC BY 4.0. Taken from the LPI’s own dataset on World Bank Data360 and stored unrounded. The survey LPI ended with 2023: the Bank’s 2025 replacement, LPI 2.0, is built on shipment tracking instead — a different instrument, deliberately not appended here. Every edition is available on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, unrounded.
12Method
Logistics Performance Index — World Bank Group
Taken from the LPI’s own dataset on World Bank Data360 and stored unrounded. The survey LPI ended with 2023: the Bank’s 2025 replacement, LPI 2.0, is built on shipment tracking instead — a different instrument, deliberately not appended here.
Newest edition
Report year 2023Data year 2023
Cite the source as: World Bank. Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-07.
7 editions — 2007, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2023 — covering 139 to 160 economies, taken from the LPI's own dataset on World Bank Data360 (WB_LPI). It scores how efficiently goods move across and within a country's borders, from a survey of logistics professionals rating customs, infrastructure, shipment timeliness and tracking. The only trade-and-infrastructure measure on the site. Both the score and the rank are the World Bank's own: nothing here is derived, and scores are stored exactly as published, unrounded. ⚠ Note the five-year gap between 2018 and 2023: the Bank suspended the survey during the pandemic, so the trend line shows a real gap rather than an interpolation. ⚠ The 2023 edition is published at one decimal place, so 139 economies share just 25 distinct scores and many tie; the Bank resolves those ties itself with standard competition ranking, which is one more reason the published rank is stored rather than a derived one. The other six editions carry six or more decimals and have no tied scores at all. ⚠ 2007 stores 149 economies but its published ranks run 1–150: the missing rank 115 is Yugoslavia, a dissolved state with no country profile here, so the gap is the publisher's numbering left intact rather than a renumbering. ⚠ THE SURVEY LPI ENDED WITH 2023. In 2025 the World Bank replaced it with LPI 2.0, built on shipment tracking data instead of a survey — a different instrument, not an eighth edition, and deliberately not appended to this series.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Logistics Performance Index by country: Logistics Performance Index, data from World Bank Group. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/logistics-performance