Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.

Photo: Afghanistan Matters · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale
Afghanistan places highest on Ecological Footprint (top 8% worldwide) and lowest on Global Violent Deaths (bottom 1%).
Population
41,454,761
people
since 1950
Land area
652,230
km²
since 1961
GDP per person
1,964
international $, PPP
since 2000
Life expectancy
66.03
years at birth
since 1950
Human development
0.496
HDI, 0–1
since 1990
Unemployment
13.35
% of the labour force
since 1991
The newest published figure for each, the year it describes and who published it, with a line showing how it has moved.
01The country
As Wikidata records them. Official languages are the least consistent — some countries list only a national language, others every regional one. Sources and licences.
02Country Index 2026
Strongest first. Each position is Afghanistan’s place among the countries with a standing on that topic, built from a few key statistics chosen to measure different things.
56thof 161
From 3 of 3 key statistics
149thof 177
From 3 of 3 key statistics
170thof 194
From 3 of 3 key statistics
160thof 182
From 2 of 4 key statistics
joint173rdof 191
From 3 of 3 key statistics
joint186thof 201
From 4 of 4 key statistics
179thof 193
From 5 of 5 key statistics
177thof 178
From 2 of 3 key statistics
197thof 198
From 3 of 3 key statistics
182ndof 182
From 4 of 4 key statistics
No standing — Afghanistan holds too few of this subject’s key statistics to be placed on it.
No standing — Afghanistan holds too few of this subject’s key statistics to be placed on it.
Each standing is built from a few key statistics chosen to measure different things. Select a subject for Afghanistan’s readings on it, or see every statistic held for Afghanistan in the table further down this page.
03Highs and lows
The two ends of its own record: every statistic on which Afghanistan sits within ten places of the best or worst in the world, plus its strongest and weakest readings overall. Each is turned into a percentile — its place among every country measured — which is what lets a hunger score and a press-freedom rank be compared at all.
In the top third of all countries measured.
Position · derived 116th of 126 · 1 = worst · 0.773 · 2025
world median 2.296 (better) · ▲ 2 pts since 2015
Position · derived 18th of 136 · 63.27 · 2024
world median 40.74 (better)
Position · derived 26th of 190 · 86.87 · 2024
world median 31.14 (better) · ▼ 2 pts since 2014
Position · derived 44th of 195 · 121.34 · 2022
world median 106.23 (better) · ▲ 27 pts since 2012
In the bottom third of all countries measured. 29 are within ten places of the worst in the world, in a field of at least 50 countries — marked with that place.
Position · derived 150th of 150 · 0 · 2024
world median 0.725 (worse)
Position · derived 1st of 206 · 1 = worst · 112.28 · 2021
world median 4.02 (worse) · ▼ 10 pts since 2011
Position · derived 181st of 182 · 5.086 · 2025
world median 53.36 (worse) · ▼ 4 pts since 2015
Position · derived 183rd of 184 · 0.66 · 2023
world median 0.971 (worse)
Position · derived 207th of 208 · -2.148 · 2024
world median -0.02 (worse) · ▼ 11 pts since 2014
Position · derived 3rd of 81 · 1 = worst · 4.5 · 2025
world median 3.1 (worse) · ▲ 3 pts since 2020
Position · derived 174th of 176 · 0.065 · 2025
world median 0.79 (worse) · ▼ 18 pts since 2015
Position · derived 206th of 209 · -1.934 · 2024
world median 0.01 (worse)
Position · derived 208th of 211 · -1.935 · 2024
world median -0.1 (worse) · ▼ 2 pts since 2014
Position · derived 173rd of 176 · 0.069 · 2025
world median 0.497 (worse) · ▼ 29 pts since 2015
Position · derived 187th of 190 · 31.88 · 2024
world median 81.25 (worse)
Position · derived 74th of 78 · 1.767 · 2025
world median 3.246 (worse) · ▼ 4 pts since 2015
Position · derived 207th of 211 · -2.205 · 2024
world median 0.04 (worse)
Position · derived 167th of 172 · 37.27 · 2024
world median 93.99 (worse)
Position · derived 177th of 182 · 32.46 · 2025
world median 57.72 (worse) · ▼ 13 pts since 2015
Position · derived 6th of 191 · 1 = worst · 7.8 · 2025
world median 3.7 (worse) · ▲ 2 pts since 2016
Position · derived 177th of 182 · 37.46 · 2025
world median 61.66 (worse) · ▼ 8 pts since 2015
Position · derived 7th of 195 · 1 = worst · 520.5 · 2023
world median 46.65 (worse)
Position · derived 7th of 93 · 1 = worst · 9.024 · 2023
world median 3.225 (worse) · ▼ 52 pts since 2016
Position · derived 7th of 127 · 1 = worst · 31 · 2023
world median 4.7 (worse) · ▼ 12 pts since 2015
Position · derived 186th of 193 · 2.515 · 2023
world median 9.933 (worse)
Position · derived 9th of 109 · 1 = worst · 0.36 · 2025
world median 0.039 (worse) · ▼ 16 pts since 2018
Position · derived 9th of 162 · 1 = worst · 44.6 · 2024
world median 13.8 (worse)
Position · derived 9th of 182 · 1 = worst · 81.77 · 2025
world median 28.67 (worse)
Position · derived 10th of 160 · 1 = worst · 1,017,000 · 2024
world median 4,750 (worse) · ▼ 34 pts since 2014
A band is a place among the countries each publisher scores, so Afghanistan can move because other countries moved. See the Country Index for the full method.
04Over time
The published rank in widely quoted reports, edition by edition — each end with the size of that year’s field — and the statistics, not already named above, on which it has gained or lost the most ground.
UNDP Human Development Report Office
137th
of 141 · 1990
181st
of 193 · 2023
Ranked in 34 of 34 editions
Transparency International
173rd
of 173 · 2012
169th
of 181 · 2025
Ranked in 14 of 14 editions
UNDP Human Development Report Office
146th
of 148 · 2008
168th
of 172 · 2023
Ranked in 16 of 34 editions
Growth Lab at Harvard University
100th
of 140 · 1995
108th
of 145 · 2024
Ranked in 30 of 30 editions
Oxford Insights
164th
of 172 · 2020
188th
of 195 · 2025
Ranked in 6 of 6 editions
Where Afghanistan has climbed against the rest of the world, in percentile points.
Where Afghanistan has slipped against the rest of the world, in percentile points.
05In context
A position reads best beside the countries around it. Every position below is a place in the world ranking of 174, not within the region.
Every country in the sub-region, by its position in the world (of 174 placed).
06The evidence
Grouped by topic. Each row gives the newest edition’s rank or position, the published value and the year the numbers describe — select a row for the world median, the best in the world and the trend.
bottom 4% of 198 countries measured
CIVICUS · Civic space score (0–100)
Afghanistan 7.68 · world median 50.46 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (Kiribati)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 9% of 185 countries measured
UNICEF · Children under 5 whose birth is registered (%)
Afghanistan 47.8 · world median 98.4 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (53 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 7% of 182 countries measured · 182 share 181 positions
Transparency International · CPI score (0–100, where 100 is very clean)
Afghanistan 16 · world median 39 (worse)
Best in the world 89 (Denmark)
▲ +5 percentile points since 2015
bottom 5% of 78 countries measured
World Bank Group · IDA Resource Allocation Index (1 = low to 6 = high)
Afghanistan 1.767 · world median 3.246 (worse)
Best in the world 4.225 (Rwanda)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2015
bottom 4% of 195 countries measured
Oxford Insights · AI readiness score (0–100)
Afghanistan 15.72 · world median 40.19 (worse)
Best in the world 88.36 (United States)
No real change since 2020
bottom 1% of 209 countries measured
World Bank Group · Governance estimate (−2.5 weak to 2.5 strong)
Afghanistan -1.934 · world median 0.01 (worse)
Best in the world 2.28 (Singapore)
No real change since 2014
bottom 21% of 168 countries measured
Open Data Watch · ODIN overall score (0–100)
Afghanistan 43 · world median 59 (worse)
Best in the world 90 (2 countries tied)
▼ -46 percentile points since 2015
bottom 32% of 135 countries measured
World Bank Group · Public sector employment (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 8.744 · world median 15.01
Highest 47.1 (Maldives)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 5% of 209 countries measured
World Bank Group · Regulatory Quality (−2.5 to 2.5)
Afghanistan -1.538 · world median -0.09 (worse)
Best in the world 2.132 (Singapore)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2014
bottom 1% of 211 countries measured
World Bank Group · Rule of Law estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)
Afghanistan -1.935 · world median -0.1 (worse)
Best in the world 2.021 (Finland)
▼ -2 percentile points since 2014
bottom 20% of 188 countries measured
World Bank Group · SPI overall score (0–100)
Afghanistan 54.39 · world median 69.3 (worse)
Best in the world 94.14 (Norway)
▲ +6 percentile points since 2016
top 49% of 139 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employees who are trade union members (%)
Afghanistan 16.77 · world median 16.68 (better)
Best in the world 91.42 (Iceland)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 1% of 176 countries measured
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Electoral democracy index (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.069 · world median 0.497 (worse)
Best in the world 0.913 (Denmark)
▼ -29 percentile points since 2015
bottom 1% of 208 countries measured
World Bank Group · Voice and Accountability estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)
Afghanistan -2.148 · world median -0.02 (worse)
Best in the world 1.929 (Norway)
▼ -11 percentile points since 2014
bottom 2% of 190 countries measured
World Bank Group · WBL Index (0–100, where 100 is full legal parity)
Afghanistan 31.88 · world median 81.25 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (14 countries tied)
No real change since 2014
top 20% of 209 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Agricultural land (% of land area)
Afghanistan 58.44 · world median 37.96
Highest 86.48 (Côte d’Ivoire)
No real change since 2013
bottom 38% of 179 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Cereal yield (kg per hectare)
Afghanistan 2,303 · world median 3,072 (worse)
Best in the world 29,147 (Oman)
No real change since 2013
top 22% of 195 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Crop production index (2014–2016 = 100)
Afghanistan 121.34 · world median 106.23 (better)
Best in the world 189.93 (Senegal)
▲ +27 percentile points since 2012
bottom 26% of 145 countries measured
Growth Lab at Harvard University · ECI score (standardised, roughly −3 to +3)
Afghanistan -0.818 · world median 0.131 (worse)
Best in the world 1.729 (Japan)
▲ +6 percentile points since 2014
bottom 12% of 191 countries measured · 191 share 188 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Fertilizer consumption (kg per hectare of arable land)
Afghanistan 6.595 · world median 87.36
Highest 2,926 (Malaysia)
No real change since 2013
top 40% of 195 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Food production index (2014–2016 = 100)
Afghanistan 111.43 · world median 106.08 (better)
Best in the world 177.49 (Senegal)
▼ -8 percentile points since 2012
bottom 8% of 169 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · IHDI (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.321 · world median 0.609 (worse)
Best in the world 0.923 (Iceland)
▼ -7 percentile points since 2013
bottom 14% of 188 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Livestock units per hectare of agricultural land
Afghanistan 0.18 · world median 0.535
Highest 43.97 (Singapore)
No real change since 2013
bottom 19% of 194 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Livestock production index (2014–2016 = 100)
Afghanistan 95.4 · world median 107.06 (worse)
Best in the world 190.08 (Malawi)
▼ -59 percentile points since 2012
bottom 1% of 139 countries measured
World Bank Group · LPI score (1–5)
Afghanistan 1.9 · world median 2.9 (worse)
Best in the world 4.3 (Singapore)
No real change since 2014
top 7% of 130 countries measured
OECD Development Assistance Committee · Net ODA received (% of GNI)
Afghanistan 17.76 · world median 2.579
Highest 101.78 (Tuvalu)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2013
bottom 34% of 197 countries measured · 197 share 180 positions
World Bank Group · Natural resources rents (% of GDP)
Afghanistan 0.429 · world median 1.708
Highest 61.03 (Libya)
No real change since 2011
bottom 30% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person
Afghanistan 35.59 · world median 38.89
Highest 54.7 (Bhutan)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2015
top 12% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employment in agriculture (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 51.63 · world median 14.38
Highest 85.34 (Burundi)
▲ +9 percentile points since 2015
top 50% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employment in industry (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 18.9 · world median 18.88
Highest 39.44 (Oman)
▼ -15 percentile points since 2015
bottom 7% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employment in services (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 29.47 · world median 59.51
Highest 92.17 (Djibouti)
▼ -7 percentile points since 2015
bottom 3% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Employed share of the population aged 15+ (%)
Afghanistan 32.46 · world median 57.72 (worse)
Best in the world 86.9 (Qatar)
▼ -13 percentile points since 2015
bottom 1% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Women aged 15+ in the labour force (%)
Afghanistan 5.086 · world median 53.36 (worse)
Best in the world 82.91 (Madagascar)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2015
bottom 20% of 179 countries measured
World Bank Group · Firms with a female top manager (%)
Afghanistan 9.579 · world median 19.16 (worse)
Best in the world 62.9 (Kiribati)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 24% of 97 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Informal employment (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 78.88 · world median 36.83 (worse)
Best in the world 0.857 (Hungary)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 3% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Population aged 15+ in the labour force (%)
Afghanistan 37.46 · world median 61.66 (worse)
Best in the world 87.01 (Qatar)
▼ -8 percentile points since 2015
bottom 17% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Output per hour worked (constant 2021 international $ at PPP)
Afghanistan 6.1 · world median 22.16 (worse)
Best in the world 164.65 (Ireland)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2015
top 6% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Self-employed (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 83.4 · world median 31.84
Highest 91.56 (Chad)
No real change since 2015
bottom 10% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Unemployment (% of labour force)
Afghanistan 13.35 · world median 5.084 (worse)
Best in the world 0.13 (Qatar)
▼ -22 percentile points since 2015
bottom 4% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Vulnerable employment (% of total employment)
Afghanistan 81.77 · world median 28.67 (worse)
Best in the world 0.456 (Qatar)
No real change since 2015
bottom 35% of 182 countries measured
International Labour Organization (ILO) · Unemployment, ages 15-24 (% of youth labour force)
Afghanistan 16.79 · world median 12.83 (worse)
Best in the world 0.457 (Niger)
▼ -21 percentile points since 2015
bottom 3% of 172 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Adults 15+ who can read and write (%)
Afghanistan 37.27 · world median 93.99 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (3 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 15% of 195 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Expected years of schooling
Afghanistan 10.79 · world median 13.34 (worse)
Best in the world 21.69 (Monaco)
No real change since 2013
bottom 4% of 193 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Mean years of schooling (adults 25+)
Afghanistan 2.515 · world median 9.933 (worse)
Best in the world 14.3 (Germany)
No real change since 2013
bottom 7% of 165 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Primary completion rate (%)
Afghanistan 55.44 · world median 97.43 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (5 countries tied)
No real change since 2015
bottom 29% of 164 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · Upper secondary completion rate (%)
Afghanistan 36.28 · world median 64.87 (worse)
Best in the world 99.27 (South Korea)
▲ +14 percentile points since 1981
bottom 4% of 174 countries measured
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · 15–24 year-olds who can read and write (%)
Afghanistan 62.66 · world median 98.22 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (6 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
top 1% of 62 countries measured
UNICEF · Children aged 5-17 with a functional difficulty (%)
Afghanistan 35.2 · world median 13
Highest 35.2 (Afghanistan)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 10% of 155 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Dietary energy supply (kcal per person per day)
Afghanistan 2,313 · world median 2,982 (worse)
Best in the world 3,962 (United States)
No real change since 2014
top 13% of 136 countries measured
UNICEF · Infants under 6 months exclusively breastfed (%)
Afghanistan 63.27 · world median 40.74 (better)
Best in the world 83.3 (Burundi)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 2% of 172 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · GII (0 = full equality, 1 = maximum inequality)
Afghanistan 0.661 · world median 0.351 (worse)
Best in the world 0.003 (Denmark)
No real change since 2013
bottom 7% of 109 countries measured
Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) · MPI (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.36 · world median 0.039 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (Serbia)
▼ -16 percentile points since 2018
bottom 16% of 44 countries measured
Food Security Information Network (FSIN) · In IPC Phase 3+ (% of analysed population)
Afghanistan 36 · world median 22 (worse)
Best in the world 3 (El Salvador)
▼ -6 percentile points since 2016
bottom 1% of 209 countries measured · 209 share 206 positions
Small Arms Survey · Violent deaths per 100,000 people
Afghanistan 112.28 · world median 4.02 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (4 countries tied)
▼ -10 percentile points since 2011
bottom 15% of 172 countries measured
World Bank Group · HCI score (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.4 · world median 0.564 (worse)
Best in the world 0.879 (Singapore)
No real change since 2017
bottom 6% of 193 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · HDI score (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.496 · world median 0.762 (worse)
Best in the world 0.972 (Iceland)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2013
bottom 5% of 81 countries measured
ACAPS · INFORM Severity (1–5, most severe crisis)
Afghanistan 4.5 · world median 3.1 (worse)
Best in the world 1.3 (Trinidad and Tobago)
▲ +3 percentile points since 2020
bottom 15% of 222 countries measured
UN DESA Population Division · Years a newborn would live at current death rates
Afghanistan 66.03 · world median 74.63 (worse)
Best in the world 86.37 (Monaco)
No real change since 2013
bottom 3% of 195 countries measured
UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group (MMEIG) · Maternal deaths per 100,000 live births
Afghanistan 520.5 · world median 46.65 (worse)
Best in the world 0.11 (Cook Islands)
No real change since 2013
bottom 5% of 133 countries measured · 133 share 127 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Population in severe food insecurity (%)
Afghanistan 31 · world median 4.7 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (7 countries tied)
▼ -12 percentile points since 2015
bottom 7% of 165 countries measured · 165 share 104 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Population undernourished (%)
Afghanistan 28.1 · world median 5.2 (worse)
Best in the world 2.5 (62 countries tied)
▼ -7 percentile points since 2013
bottom 5% of 162 countries measured
UNICEF, WHO and World Bank Group (Joint Malnutrition Estimates) · Children under 5 who are stunted (%)
Afghanistan 44.6 · world median 13.8 (worse)
Best in the world 0.518 (Latvia)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 13% of 200 countries measured
UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME) · Deaths before age five (per 1,000 live births)
Afghanistan 53.03 · world median 14.54 (worse)
Best in the world 1.26 (San Marino)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2014
bottom 15% of 90 countries measured
UNICEF · Children aged 1-14 experiencing violent discipline (%)
Afghanistan 87.6 · world median 75.8 (worse)
Best in the world 37.6 (Qatar)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 23% of 215 countries measured
World Bank Group · Population with electricity access (%)
Afghanistan 87.8 · world median 100 (worse)
Best in the world 100 (122 countries tied)
▼ -9 percentile points since 2014
top 40% of 121 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Irrigated share of agricultural land (%)
Afghanistan 5.979 · world median 3.66
Highest 89.04 (Bangladesh)
No earlier reading to compare
top 31% of 206 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Arable land (hectares per person)
Afghanistan 0.189 · world median 0.109
Highest 1.459 (Kazakhstan)
▼ -6 percentile points since 2013
top 49% of 161 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Share of the cereal supply that is imported (%)
Afghanistan 46.1 · world median 42.8
Highest 100 (16 countries tied)
▲ +11 percentile points since 2012
bottom 26% of 145 countries measured · 145 share 143 positions
UNICEF · Women 20–24 married before 18 (%)
Afghanistan 28.7 · world median 17.1 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (3 countries tied)
No earlier reading to compare
bottom 15% of 169 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Coefficient of Human Inequality (%)
Afghanistan 34.41 · world median 17.05 (worse)
Best in the world 4.865 (Slovenia)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2013
bottom 7% of 93 countries measured
World Bank Group · Average cost of sending $200 home (% of the amount)
Afghanistan 9.024 · world median 3.225 (worse)
Best in the world -49.69 (Malawi)
▼ -52 percentile points since 2016
bottom 1% of 184 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Gender Development Index (1.000 = parity)
Afghanistan 0.66 · world median 0.971 (worse)
Best in the world 1 (2 countries tied)
No real change since 2013
top 28% of 180 countries measured · 180 share 179 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Land under cereal production (hectares)
Afghanistan 2,346,054 · world median 689,278
Highest 103,715,108 (India)
▼ -5 percentile points since 2013
bottom 2% of 156 countries measured · 156 share 150 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Organic share of agricultural land (%)
Afghanistan 0 · world median 0.725 (worse)
Best in the world 86.38 (Samoa)
No real change since 2015
bottom 11% of 156 countries measured
UNDP Human Development Report Office · PHDI (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.492 · world median 0.678 (worse)
Best in the world 0.827 (United Kingdom)
▼ -2 percentile points since 2013
top 1% of 173 countries measured · 173 share 171 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Freshwater withdrawn for agriculture (% of total)
Afghanistan 98.17 · world median 62.14
Highest 99.48 (Somalia)
No real change since 2012
top 35% of 198 countries measured · 198 share 193 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Farm-gate emissions (kt CO₂eq)
Afghanistan 16,159 · world median 8,635
Highest 1,044,508 (India)
No real change since 2013
top 8% of 126 countries measured
Global Footprint Network · Ecological Footprint (global hectares per person)
Afghanistan 0.773 · world median 2.296 (better)
Best in the world 0.514 (Yemen)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2015
bottom 12% of 213 countries measured · 213 share 210 positions
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Forest area (% of land area)
Afghanistan 1.853 · world median 31.08
Highest 94.45 (Suriname)
No real change since 2013
bottom 6% of 160 countries measured
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) · New displacements by disaster (people)
Afghanistan 1,017,000 · world median 4,750 (worse)
Best in the world 1 (Serbia)
▼ -34 percentile points since 2014
bottom 33% of 181 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Renewable internal freshwater (cubic metres per person)
Afghanistan 1,162 · world median 2,528 (worse)
Best in the world 445,023 (Iceland)
▼ -4 percentile points since 2012
top 13% of 193 countries measured · 193 share 190 positions
Ember · Renewables (% of electricity generated)
Afghanistan 86.87 · world median 31.14 (better)
Best in the world 100 (7 countries tied)
▼ -2 percentile points since 2014
bottom 18% of 177 countries measured
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · Freshwater withdrawal as a share of available resources (%)
Afghanistan 54.76 · world median 10 (worse)
Best in the world 0.03 (Republic of the Congo)
No real change since 2013
top 47% of 193 countries measured
Institute for International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict (IFHV), Ruhr University Bochum · WorldRiskIndex score (0–100, where 100 is the most at risk)
Afghanistan 3.7 · world median 4.17 (better)
Best in the world 0.18 (Monaco)
No real change since 2015
bottom 14% of 196 countries measured · 196 share 59 positions
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) · Deaths in organized violence (people)
Afghanistan 332 · world median 0 (worse)
Best in the world 0 (138 countries tied)
▲ +14 percentile points since 2015
top 30% of 149 countries measured
Bonn International Centre for Conflict Studies (BICC) · GMI score (higher means a heavier military weight)
Afghanistan 75.28 · world median 100.66 (better)
Best in the world 3.512 (Haiti)
▲ +26 percentile points since 2013
bottom 3% of 191 countries measured
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · INFORM Risk score (0–10, where 10 is the highest risk)
Afghanistan 7.8 · world median 3.7 (worse)
Best in the world 0.7 (Singapore)
▲ +2 percentile points since 2016
bottom 1% of 176 countries measured
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Freedom from political killings and torture (0–1)
Afghanistan 0.065 · world median 0.79 (worse)
Best in the world 0.989 (2 countries tied)
▼ -18 percentile points since 2015
bottom 2% of 211 countries measured
World Bank Group · Political Stability estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)
Afghanistan -2.205 · world median 0.04 (worse)
Best in the world 1.582 (Liechtenstein)
No real change since 2014
The newest edition of these reports does not include Afghanistan. Usually the publisher does not cover it; sometimes it has dropped out of a ranking it used to appear in.
07Keep reading
08Method
How a standing is built from percentiles, why Afghanistan can move because other countries moved, and why publishers measure between 120 and 215 countries each are set out in full in how a standing is made and what a standing cannot tell you.
The photograph of Afghanistan on this page comes from Wikimedia Commons and is shown in greyscale. The photographer and the licence are named beside each one.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Afghanistan: country statistics, rankings and trends. https://nationsinquiry.com/countries/afghanistan