Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · INFORM Risk Index
How likely is a humanitarian crisis to overwhelm a country?
Of the 191 countries compared in 2025, Singapore had the lowest reading, 0.7, and South Sudan had the highest reading, 8.5. In the middle country the figure was 3.7. Among the 191 countries measured in every edition since 2016, the middle one moved from 3.6 to 3.7.
INFORM Risk Index · 2025
Key statistic · Risk & Resilience
Lowest of 191Singapore
0.7012025 · position · derived
The three countries at the lowest end of 191 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: Khairul Nizam . · CC BY 2.0, greyscale
2Photo: Guido Radig,Inkey · CC BY 3.0, greyscale
3Photo: Michal Osmenda from Brussels, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0, greyscale
Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
Seychelles1.4
Singapore0.7
2 countries share 1.0
New Zealand1.6
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a lower value — the better end.
2.5
the middle country, of 40 measured · 49 members
2 share 1.0
Ukraine5.6
Lowest and highest reading in Europe.
3.1
the middle country, of 14 measured · 21 members
New Zealand1.6
Papua New Guinea6.3
Lowest and highest reading in Oceania.
3.7
the middle country, of 35 measured · 48 members
Saint Kitts and Nevis1.9
Haiti7.5
Lowest and highest reading in Americas.
3.8
the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members
Singapore0.7
Yemen8.1
Lowest and highest reading in Asia.
5.4
the middle country, of 54 measured · 55 members
Seychelles1.4
South Sudan8.5
Lowest and highest reading in Africa.
1.9
the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members
Denmark1.3
Latvia2.6
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Europe.
2.5
the middle country, of 8 measured · 9 members
2 share 1.0
3 share 2.6
Lowest and highest reading in Western Europe.
2.7
the middle country, of 12 measured · 17 members
Malta1.7
Bosnia and Herzegovina3.6
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Europe.
2.8
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Czechia1.9
Ukraine5.6
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.
2.8
the middle country, of 13 measured · 24 members
Saint Kitts and Nevis1.9
Haiti7.5
Lowest and highest reading in Caribbean.
2.8
the middle country, of 5 measured · 8 members
South Korea2.0
North Korea3.7
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Asia.
3.3
the middle country, of 5 measured · 7 members
2 share 2.1
Kiribati3.6
Lowest and highest reading in Micronesia.
3.5
the middle country, of 18 measured · 19 members
Qatar1.4
Yemen8.1
Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.
3.6
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Kazakhstan2.8
Tajikistan4.6
Lowest and highest reading in Central Asia.
4.0
the middle country, of 11 measured · 11 members
Singapore0.7
Myanmar6.9
Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.
4.3
the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members
Uruguay2.5
Venezuela5.9
Lowest and highest reading in South America.
4.3
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Botswana3.3
South Africa5.1
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Africa.
4.4
the middle country, of 8 measured · 8 members
Costa Rica3.7
Guatemala5.8
Lowest and highest reading in Central America.
4.7
the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members
Tunisia3.5
Sudan7.8
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Africa.
5.3
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Maldives2.1
Afghanistan7.8
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.
5.3
the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members
Cabo Verde2.6
Niger7.5
Lowest and highest reading in Western Africa.
5.6
the middle country, of 18 measured · 19 members
Seychelles1.4
South Sudan8.5
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.
6.0
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
São Tomé and Príncipe2.5
DR Congo8.0
Lowest and highest reading in Middle Africa.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
New Zealand1.6
Australia2.4
Lowest and highest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.
Fiji3.1
Papua New Guinea6.3
Lowest and highest reading in Melanesia.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada2.8
United States3.2
Lowest and highest reading in Northern America.
3 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Samoa, Tonga, Tuvalu.
Tuvalu2.5
Tonga3.0
Lowest and highest reading in Polynesia.
03The whole field at once
191 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 3.7; a quarter are above 5.3, and a quarter below 2.6. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 191 ever measured
In order, highest value first — position 1 is the highest value, the way European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee’s own tables read. “=” marks a position shared with another country. European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. Scores are published to one decimal, so 191 countries hold only 65 distinct values between them; ten countries sit on 2.6 alone. Neighbouring positions should be read as the same reading, which is exactly what INFORM’s own five risk classes say.
Showing 25 of 191 countries
Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
052016–2025 · 10 editions
Each point is one published edition, named for the year it is released and built from the year before — so the 2026 edition describes 2025.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 191 | 3.7 | 2.6 – 5.3 | 3.7 |
| 2024 | 191 | 3.5 | 2.6 – 5.3 | 3.5 |
| 2023 | 191 | 3.6 | 2.6 – 5.2 | 3.6 |
| 2022 | 191 | 3.6 | 2.6 – 5.2 | 3.6 |
| 2021 | 191 | 3.6 | 2.4 – 5.3 | 3.6 |
| 2020 | 191 | 3.6 | 2.4 – 5.3 | 3.6 |
| 2019 | 191 | 3.6 | 2.4 – 5.1 | 3.6 |
| 2018 | 191 | 3.5 | 2.4 – 5.1 | 3.5 |
| 2017 | 191 | 3.5 | 2.5 – 5.2 | 3.5 |
| 2016 | 191 | 3.6 | 2.4 – 5.3 | 3.6 |
062024 → 2025
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
191 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
8.7
INFORM Risk score (0–10, where 10 is the highest risk)
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · 2016
Lowest reading on record
0.6
INFORM Risk score (0–10, where 10 is the highest risk)
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · 2016
Biggest improvement between editions
−0.9
4.0 → 3.1
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · 2021 → 2022
Biggest decline between editions
+1.0
3.0 → 4.0
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · 2021 → 2022
Most improved since first measured
−1.4
4.3 → 2.9
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · 2016 → 2025
At the top most often
10 of 10
editions, alone at the first-listed end
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee · 2016–2025
08The parts of the index
European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee publishes the parts the headline is built from. Each part’s highest and lowest country, and its middle value.
| Part | Highest | Lowest | Middle country |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard & Exposure191 countries | 3.7 | ||
| Vulnerability191 countries | 3.8 | ||
| Lack of Coping Capacity191 countries | 4.2 |
09The measure
INFORM Risk scores a country’s exposure to humanitarian crisis from 0 to 10, combining the hazards it faces, how vulnerable its people are, and how little capacity there is to cope. Built by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre with the UN’s Inter-Agency Standing Committee, it is what aid agencies use to decide where to prepare.
What the number is: INFORM Risk score (0–10, where 10 is the highest risk).
What it does not measure
It is a risk profile, not a forecast of any particular crisis, and it does not measure how severe a crisis already under way has become — the INFORM Severity Index does that.
10Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
A key statistic for Risk & Resilience
“Humanitarian crisis risk, which counts conflict and displacement that the hazard indices leave out. Correlates 0.468 with the World Risk Index.”
Where INFORM Risk Index is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where INFORM Risk Index is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 126 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
11Keep reading
12Questions
Singapore, at 0.7, among the 191 countries compared in 2025.
South Sudan, at 8.5, among the 191 countries compared in 2025.
191 in 2025.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 191 compared in 2025, the figure was 3.7.
No. European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds 10 editions, describing 2016 to 2025.
From European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee, under CC BY 4.0 (via the European Commission's reuse policy). From the JRC’s own trend file, with all three dimensions stored alongside the score. It measures humanitarian crisis risk — conflict, displacement and fragility included — where the World Risk Index measures natural hazards. Near neighbours, not duplicates. Every edition is available on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, unrounded.
13Method
INFORM Risk Index — European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee
From the JRC’s own trend file, with all three dimensions stored alongside the score. It measures humanitarian crisis risk — conflict, displacement and fragility included — where the World Risk Index measures natural hazards. Near neighbours, not duplicates.
Newest edition
Report year 2026Data year 2025
Cite the source as: European Commission, Joint Research Centre. INFORM Risk Index. Ispra: European Commission.
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (via the European Commission's reuse policy), checked 2026-08-29.
10 editions (2017–2026) covering 191 countries, from the JRC's own trend file. Each edition is named for the year it is published and is built from data for the year before, so the 2026 edition describes 2025. The score combines three dimensions — hazard and exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity — all of which are stored alongside it. ⚠ It measures HUMANITARIAN CRISIS risk, which includes conflict, displacement and political fragility, where the World Risk Index measures exposure to natural hazards. They are near neighbours but not duplicates: Afghanistan sits near the top here and mid-table there. ⚠ ⚠ INFORM publishes five risk classes rather than an ordinal ranking. A POSITION is derived here (2026-09-10) by ordering the score, and the score is published to ONE DECIMAL, so 191 countries hold only 65 distinct values between them: the deepest run is ten countries at 2.6, all sharing position 138. Neighbouring positions should be read as the same reading, which is exactly what INFORM’s own classes say.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). INFORM Risk Index by country: INFORM Risk Index, data from European Commission Joint Research Centre, with the Inter-Agency Standing Committee. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/inform-risk