Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

ESMAP · RISE Clean Cooking Policy Score

Clean cooking policy by country

How strong are a country's policies for moving households to clean cooking?

Of the 57 countries compared in 2023, Kenya had the highest reading, 80.7, and 2 countries shared the lowest reading, 0.0. In the middle country the figure was 29.7. Among the 56 countries measured in every edition since 2010, the middle one moved from 1.7 to 29.4.

Part ofEnergy

Clean cooking policy · 2023

Context statistic

Highest of 57Kenya

80.7

012023 · values only

Who leads

The three countries at the highest end of 57 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

  1. 1

    Kenya

    Eastern Africa

    80.7

    Photo: John Storr · CC0, greyscale

  2. 2

    India

    Southern Asia

    80.0

    Photo: Kumaravels derivative work: ויקיג'אנקי · CC BY 2.5 in, greyscale

  3. 3

    Malawi

    Eastern Africa

    75.0

    Photo: Rockwurm derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

Lowest in 2023

  1. Papua New Guinea0.0
  2. Guinea0.0
  3. Yemen1.7

Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Highest on each continent

02Every measured country

Clean cooking policy on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a higher value — the better end.

  • 0.0–13.1
  • 15.0–23.8
  • 23.9–35.6
  • 35.8–54.6
  • 55.6–80.7
  • No reading in 2023
  • Africa

    32.1

    the middle country, of 35 measured · 55 members

    Kenya80.7

    Guinea0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Africa.

  • Asia

    31.5

    the middle country, of 15 measured · 52 members

    India80.0

    Yemen1.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Asia.

  • Americas

    4 of 48 measured — too few for a middle: Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua.

    Haiti35.0

    Nicaragua18.1

    Highest and lowest reading in Americas.

  • Oceania

    3 of 21 measured — too few for a middle: Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.

    Vanuatu13.1

    Papua New Guinea0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.

12 sub-regions, highest middle country first
  • Eastern Africa

    38.1

    the middle country, of 14 measured · 19 members

    Kenya80.7

    Madagascar3.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Middle Africa

    32.3

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members

    Cameroon38.3

    Republic of the Congo12.4

    Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.

  • South-eastern Asia

    31.5

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 11 members

    Indonesia68.5

    Cambodia10.8

    Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Western Africa

    31.4

    the middle country, of 13 measured · 16 members

    Ghana68.9

    Guinea0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.

  • Southern Asia

    13.1

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members

    India80.0

    Afghanistan8.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Caribbean

    1 of 24 measured — too few for a middle: Haiti.

    Haiti35.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.

  • Central America

    3 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua.

    Honduras23.8

    Nicaragua18.1

    Highest and lowest reading in Central America.

  • Eastern Asia

    2 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: China, Mongolia.

    China56.7

    Mongolia35.6

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Melanesia

    3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.

    Vanuatu13.1

    Papua New Guinea0.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.

  • Northern Africa

    1 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Sudan.

    Sudan24.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Southern Africa

    1 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: South Africa.

    South Africa20.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.

  • Western Asia

    1 of 19 measured — too few for a middle: Yemen.

    Yemen1.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.

03The whole field at once

The spread

57 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 29.7; a quarter are above 46.4, and a quarter below 15.6. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

020406080Africa35 comparedKenya: 80.7Malawi: 75.0Rwanda: 70.3Ghana: 68.9Ethiopia: 62.1Tanzania: 55.6Uganda: 54.6Nigeria: 53.5Senegal: 46.4Mozambique: 39.2Mali: 38.9Niger: 38.7Cameroon: 38.3Burundi: 37.1DR Congo: 36.4Zambia: 35.8Chad: 34.9Mauritania: 32.1Liberia: 31.4Angola: 29.7Zimbabwe: 29.2Côte d’Ivoire: 27.2Sudan: 24.0Benin: 23.9South Africa: 20.0Central African Republic: 18.8Burkina Faso: 18.6Somalia: 18.6Togo: 16.9Sierra Leone: 15.6Eritrea: 15.0Republic of the Congo: 12.4South Sudan: 6.7Madagascar: 3.3Guinea: 0.0Guinea 0.0Kenya 80.7Americas4 comparedHaiti: 35.0Honduras: 23.8Guatemala: 20.4Nicaragua: 18.1Nicaragua 18.1 · Haiti 35.0Asia15 comparedIndia: 80.0Indonesia: 68.5Nepal: 67.5Laos: 61.0China: 56.7Bangladesh: 49.0Mongolia: 35.6Philippines: 31.5Myanmar: 23.1Sri Lanka: 13.1Pakistan: 12.8Cambodia: 10.8Maldives: 9.2Afghanistan: 8.3Yemen: 1.7Yemen 1.7India 80.0Oceania3 comparedVanuatu: 13.1Solomon Islands: 3.1Papua New Guinea: 0.0Papua New Guinea 0.0 · Vanuatu 13.1middle country 29.7

04All 57 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first. No rank or position is shown: too many countries share the same value for an order to mean anything. Only countries where clean cooking is not yet universal are scored, so this is not a ranking of the world. Several countries still score zero, and a high score means a plan exists, not that households have switched.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 57 countries

  1. KenyaEastern Africa80.7
  2. IndiaSouthern Asia80.0
  3. MalawiEastern Africa75.0
  4. RwandaEastern Africa70.3
  5. GhanaWestern Africa68.9
  6. IndonesiaSouth-eastern Asia68.5
  7. NepalSouthern Asia67.5
  8. EthiopiaEastern Africa62.1
  9. LaosSouth-eastern Asia61.0
  10. ChinaEastern Asia56.7
  11. TanzaniaEastern Africa55.6
  12. UgandaEastern Africa54.6
  13. NigeriaWestern Africa53.5
  14. BangladeshSouthern Asia49.0
  15. SenegalWestern Africa46.4
  16. MozambiqueEastern Africa39.2
  17. MaliWestern Africa38.9
  18. NigerWestern Africa38.7
  19. CameroonMiddle Africa38.3
  20. BurundiEastern Africa37.1
  21. DR CongoMiddle Africa36.4
  22. ZambiaEastern Africa35.8
  23. MongoliaEastern Asia35.6
  24. HaitiCaribbean35.0
  25. ChadMiddle Africa34.9

Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

052010–2023 · 14 reference years

Over time

Each point is one year from 2010 to 2023, all scored on the same method by the 2024 edition of RISE, so the line can be read end to end. Many countries start at zero, with no clean cooking policy at all.

0102030405020102012201420162018202020222023AfricaAsia2010: middle country 1.7 of 572011: middle country 2.2 of 562012: middle country 3.1 of 562013: middle country 5.0 of 572014: middle country 5.8 of 572015: middle country 7.8 of 572016: middle country 11.9 of 572017: middle country 16.7 of 572018: middle country 18.6 of 572019: middle country 21.4 of 572020: middle country 23.8 of 572021: middle country 31.4 of 572022: middle country 25.6 of 572023: middle country 29.7 of 57
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 56 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
20235729.715.6 – 46.429.4
20225725.613.1 – 38.924.7
20215731.415.0 – 53.128.9
20205723.810.8 – 47.222.8
20195721.48.3 – 31.420.6
20185718.66.7 – 27.218.3
20175716.75.1 – 26.116.3
20165711.95.0 – 20.611.5
2015577.85.0 – 20.68.1
2014575.81.7 – 16.46.0
2013575.00.0 – 15.05.0
2012563.10.0 – 10.33.1
2011562.20.0 – 6.92.2
2010571.70.0 – 6.41.7

062022 → 2023

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Senegal10.8 → 46.4+35.6
  2. Philippines5.0 → 31.5+26.5
  3. Ghana55.0 → 68.9+13.9
  4. Nigeria46.9 → 53.5+6.5
  5. Mozambique33.1 → 39.2+6.1

Declined most

before → after

No country moved this way.

57 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023.

07Across every edition

Clean cooking policy in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08The parts of the index

Inside the number

World Bank Group (ESMAP) publishes the parts the headline is built from. Each part’s highest and lowest country, and its middle value.

PartHighestLowestMiddle country
Clean cooking national planning57 countries2 countries share 1003 countries share 051
Implementation scope of clean cooking planning57 countriesMalawi10010 countries share 038
Incentives and attributes for clean cooking57 countriesRwanda10024 countries share 017
Standards and labelling57 countriesKenya9327 countries share 08

09The measure

About clean cooking policy

The RISE clean cooking score rates the plans, incentives and standards a country has for moving households from wood, charcoal and kerosene to clean cooking fuels and stoves, on a scale of 0 to 100. It is published by the World Bank's Energy Sector Management Assistance Program and measures the policy, not how many households cook cleanly.

What the number is: Clean cooking policy score (0–100).

10Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Energy, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

EnergyWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where clean cooking policy is higher, these tend to be higher too.

No statistic lines up this closely.

Moves against

Where clean cooking policy is higher, these tend to be lower.

No statistic lines up this closely.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 0 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

12Questions

Clean cooking policy: questions and answers

Which country has the highest clean cooking policy?

Kenya, at 80.7, among the 57 countries compared in 2023.

Which country has the lowest clean cooking policy?

2 countries share the lowest reading, 0.0, among the 57 compared in 2023, so no single country is named.

How many countries does the RISE Clean Cooking Policy Score cover?

57 in 2023. The number measured varies from 56 to 57 between editions.

What is the world average clean cooking policy?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 57 compared in 2023, the figure was 29.7.

Is this World Bank Group (ESMAP)’s own ranking?

No ranking is shown. World Bank Group (ESMAP) publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything, so none is derived.

How often is the RISE Clean Cooking Policy Score published?

This site holds 14 reference years, 2010–2023, all recalculated in World Bank Group (ESMAP)’s 2024 report on one method — not 14 separate publications.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From World Bank Group (ESMAP), under CC BY 4.0. From World Bank Data360 (RISE), the 2024 edition's annual series. The four parts of the score are stored beside it. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

13Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

RISE Clean Cooking Policy Score — World Bank Group (ESMAP)

From World Bank Data360 (RISE), the 2024 edition's annual series. The four parts of the score are stored beside it.

Newest edition

Report year 2023Data year 2023

Cite the source as: World Bank. Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy (RISE) 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank / ESMAP.

Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-29.

The full 2023 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • No rank or position is shown: World Bank Group (ESMAP) publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Photographs

The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Clean cooking policy by country: RISE Clean Cooking Policy Score, data from World Bank Group (ESMAP). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/rise-clean-cooking

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.