Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
ESMAP · RISE Energy Efficiency Policy Score
How strong are a country's laws and policies for using energy efficiently?
Of the 140 countries compared in 2023, South Korea had the highest reading, 95.926, and Burundi had the lowest reading, 1.975. In the middle country the figure was 48.225. Among the 140 countries measured in every edition since 2010, the middle one moved from 8.951 to 48.225.
Part ofEnergy
Energy efficiency policy · 2023
Context statistic
Highest of 140South Korea
95.926012023 · values only
The three countries at the highest end of 140 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: Unknown author · CC BY-SA 2.0, greyscale
2
3Photo: grin derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a higher value — the better end.
75.148
the middle country, of 33 measured · 49 members
Germany88.333
Ukraine42.679
Highest and lowest reading in Europe.
48.673
the middle country, of 41 measured · 52 members
South Korea95.926
Yemen4.481
Highest and lowest reading in Asia.
43.025
the middle country, of 22 measured · 48 members
Canada81.790
Haiti7.747
Highest and lowest reading in Americas.
25.494
the middle country, of 5 measured · 21 members
Australia70.031
Solomon Islands17.623
Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.
24.099
the middle country, of 39 measured · 55 members
Kenya73.889
Burundi1.975
Highest and lowest reading in Africa.
79.870
the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members
Germany88.333
France70.580
Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.
77.713
the middle country, of 6 measured · 13 members
Denmark83.778
Finland73.852
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.
64.494
the middle country, of 9 measured · 11 members
Singapore80.833
Laos15.383
Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.
60.123
the middle country, of 11 measured · 17 members
Italy85.086
Albania46.049
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.
59.287
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Hungary86.111
Ukraine42.679
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.
54.438
the middle country, of 5 measured · 6 members
Tunisia62.401
Sudan24.623
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.
52.469
the middle country, of 8 measured · 9 members
India80.741
Maldives14.815
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.
42.978
the middle country, of 10 measured · 12 members
Brazil71.852
Venezuela18.611
Highest and lowest reading in South America.
38.272
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
Mexico61.728
Guatemala14.784
Highest and lowest reading in Central America.
36.204
the middle country, of 15 measured · 19 members
Jordan71.105
Yemen4.481
Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.
32.130
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Uzbekistan51.574
Turkmenistan13.802
Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.
30.123
the middle country, of 13 measured · 16 members
Senegal61.469
Liberia4.753
Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.
15.463
the middle country, of 14 measured · 19 members
Kenya73.889
Burundi1.975
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.
12.426
the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members
Chad39.907
Republic of the Congo2.222
Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
Australia70.031
New Zealand63.611
Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
3 of 24 measured — too few for a middle: Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica.
Jamaica49.235
Haiti7.747
Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.
4 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: China, Japan, Mongolia, South Korea.
South Korea95.926
Mongolia32.870
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.
3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.
Papua New Guinea25.494
Solomon Islands17.623
Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada81.790
United States81.642
Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.
1 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: South Africa.
South Africa66.111
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.
03The whole field at once
140 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 48.225; a quarter are above 66.975, and a quarter below 24.023. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 140 ever measured
In order, highest value first. No rank or position is shown: too many countries share the same value for an order to mean anything. A high score means the policy framework exists, not that the country is efficient in practice — a country can write good rules and enforce them weakly. The nine parts of the score show which rules are in place and which are missing.
Showing 25 of 140 countries
Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
052010–2023 · 14 reference years
Each point is one year from 2010 to 2023, all scored on the same method by the 2024 edition of RISE, so the line can be read end to end. A step up usually marks a law, a standard or an agency coming into force.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 140 | 48.225 | 24.023 – 66.975 | 48.225 |
| 2022 | 140 | 46.142 | 22.722 – 63.642 | 46.142 |
| 2021 | 140 | 42.497 | 19.529 – 63.218 | 42.497 |
| 2020 | 140 | 40.552 | 19.213 – 62.198 | 40.552 |
| 2019 | 140 | 38.809 | 17.269 – 60.801 | 38.809 |
| 2018 | 140 | 32.528 | 14.733 – 59.715 | 32.528 |
| 2017 | 140 | 31.833 | 12.901 – 58.427 | 31.833 |
| 2016 | 140 | 27.778 | 10.696 – 54.236 | 27.778 |
| 2015 | 140 | 24.414 | 7.863 – 49.983 | 24.414 |
| 2014 | 140 | 19.735 | 4.444 – 43.380 | 19.735 |
| 2013 | 140 | 17.966 | 3.667 – 40.958 | 17.966 |
| 2012 | 140 | 14.602 | 3.241 – 32.843 | 14.602 |
| 2011 | 140 | 10.602 | 2.153 – 29.969 | 10.602 |
| 2010 | 140 | 8.951 | 1.574 – 24.927 | 8.951 |
062022 → 2023
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
No country moved this way.
140 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
95.926
Energy efficiency policy score (0–100)
Lowest reading on record
Reached 75 times by 15 countries — shared, so no holder is named
0.000
Energy efficiency policy score (0–100)
Biggest improvement between editions
+52.191
16.204 → 68.395
Most improved since first measured
+73.889
0.000 → 73.889
At the top most often
6 of 14
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The parts of the index
World Bank Group (ESMAP) publishes the parts the headline is built from. Each part’s highest and lowest country, and its middle value.
| Part | Highest | Lowest | Middle country |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy efficiency governance140 countries | 23 countries share 100.0 | 80.3 | |
| Energy utility programmes140 countries | 43 | ||
| Industrial and commercial end users140 countries | 23 countries share 100 | 25 countries share 0 | 50 |
| Energy efficiency in the public sector140 countries | 18 countries share 100 | 29 countries share 0 | 50 |
| Financing mechanisms140 countries | 21 countries share 100 | 42 countries share 0 | 50 |
| Minimum energy performance standards140 countries | 4 countries share 100 | 26 countries share 0 | 50 |
| Energy labelling systems140 countries | 7 countries share 100 | 33 countries share 0 | 50 |
| Building energy codes140 countries | 36 countries share 0 | 33 | |
| Transport sector140 countries | 9 countries share 100 | 49 countries share 0 | 25 |
09The measure
The RISE energy efficiency score rates the policies and regulations a country has in place to make energy use more efficient — from national targets and building codes to appliance standards, labels and financing — on a scale of 0 to 100. It is published by the World Bank's Energy Sector Management Assistance Program and measures the rulebook, not the result.
What the number is: Energy efficiency policy score (0–100).
What it does not measure
It scores the policies and regulations on the books, not whether they are enforced or how efficiently the country actually uses energy.
10Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Energy, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Where energy efficiency policy is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where energy efficiency policy is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 179 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
11Keep reading
12Questions
South Korea, at 95.926, among the 140 countries compared in 2023.
Burundi, at 1.975, among the 140 countries compared in 2023.
140 in 2023.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 140 compared in 2023, the figure was 48.225.
No ranking is shown. World Bank Group (ESMAP) publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything, so none is derived.
This site holds 14 reference years, 2010–2023, all recalculated in World Bank Group (ESMAP)’s 2024 report on one method — not 14 separate publications.
From World Bank Group (ESMAP), under CC BY 4.0. From World Bank Data360 (RISE), the 2024 edition's annual series. RISE's overall score is not used: it averages a different number of pillars for different countries. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.
13Method
RISE Energy Efficiency Policy Score — World Bank Group (ESMAP)
From World Bank Data360 (RISE), the 2024 edition's annual series. RISE's overall score is not used: it averages a different number of pillars for different countries.
Newest edition
Report year 2023Data year 2023
Cite the source as: World Bank. Regulatory Indicators for Sustainable Energy (RISE) 2024. Washington, DC: World Bank / ESMAP.
Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-26.
The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Energy efficiency policy by country: RISE Energy Efficiency Policy Score, data from World Bank Group (ESMAP). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/rise-energy-efficiency