Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

World Energy Council · World Energy Trilemma Index

World Energy Trilemma Index by country

How well does a country balance secure, affordable and clean energy?

Denmark placed first of the 126 countries compared in 2023, at 83.2, and Niger last, at 27.7. In the middle country the figure was 63.8.

Share

Part ofEconomy & InnovationEnvironment & SustainabilityEnergy

World Energy Trilemma Index · 2023

Key statistic · Energy

Highest of 126Denmark

83.2

012023 · World Energy Council’s rank

Who leads

The three countries at the highest end of 126 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

  1. 1

    Denmark

    Northern Europe

    83.2

    Joint 1st of 126

    Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  2. 2

    Sweden

    Northern Europe

    83.1

    Joint 1st of 126

    Photo: User:Pieter Kuiper · Public domain, greyscale

  3. 3

    Finland

    Northern Europe

    82.7

    2nd of 126

    Photo: Joonas Lyytinen · CC BY-SA 2.5, greyscale

Lowest in 2023

  1. 99Niger27.7
  2. 98DR Congo33.5
  3. 97Benin35.4

Ranks out of 126. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Highest on each continent

02Every measured country

World Energy Trilemma Index on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a higher value — the better end.

  • 27.7–52.3
  • 52.4–61.5
  • 61.6–65.8
  • 65.9–76.0
  • 76.1–83.2
  • No reading in 2023
  • Europe

    76.6

    the middle country, of 37 measured · 49 members

    Denmark83.2

    Moldova57.2

    Highest and lowest reading in Europe.

  • Americas

    65.7

    the middle country, of 21 measured · 48 members

    Canada81.0

    Honduras52.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Americas.

  • Asia

    62.5

    the middle country, of 37 measured · 52 members

    Japan75.0

    Nepal40.5

    Highest and lowest reading in Asia.

  • Africa

    44.2

    the middle country, of 29 measured · 55 members

    Mauritius65.3

    Niger27.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Africa.

  • Oceania

    2 of 21 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    New Zealand79.6

    Australia75.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.

19 sub-regions, highest middle country first
  • Western Europe

    80.2

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members

    Switzerland82.1

    Belgium77.1

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.

  • Northern Europe

    80.0

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members

    Denmark83.2

    Lithuania75.0

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.

  • Eastern Europe

    72.9

    the middle country, of 8 measured · 10 members

    Czechia78.0

    Moldova57.2

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Southern Europe

    70.5

    the middle country, of 12 measured · 17 members

    Slovenia78.4

    North Macedonia59.9

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.

  • South America

    67.7

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 12 members

    Uruguay75.9

    Bolivia61.6

    Highest and lowest reading in South America.

  • Western Asia

    65.4

    the middle country, of 15 measured · 19 members

    Israel74.1

    Iraq52.2

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.

  • Eastern Asia

    64.4

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 8 members

    Japan75.0

    Mongolia52.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Central America

    62.5

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members

    Costa Rica69.7

    Honduras52.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Central America.

  • South-eastern Asia

    60.5

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 11 members

    Singapore70.1

    Myanmar46.5

    Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Southern Asia

    50.9

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members

    Sri Lanka60.4

    Nepal40.5

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Middle Africa

    44.7

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 9 members

    Gabon58.8

    DR Congo33.5

    Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.

  • Eastern Africa

    41.6

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 19 members

    Mauritius65.3

    Malawi36.6

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Western Africa

    41.2

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 16 members

    Ghana47.6

    Niger27.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    New Zealand79.6

    Australia75.7

    Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Caribbean

    3 of 24 measured — too few for a middle: Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago.

    Dominican Republic58.1

    Jamaica57.3

    Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.

  • Central Asia

    2 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kazakhstan, Tajikistan.

    Kazakhstan63.4

    Tajikistan57.5

    Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.

  • Northern Africa

    4 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Algeria, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia.

    Egypt62.2

    Morocco59.6

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Northern America

    2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.

    Canada81.0

    United States78.9

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.

  • Southern Africa

    4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Botswana, Eswatini, Namibia, South Africa.

    South Africa57.6

    2 share 51.1

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.

03The whole field at once

The spread

126 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 63.8; a quarter are above 74.3, and a quarter below 57.0. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

304050607080Africa29 comparedMauritius: 65.3Egypt: 62.2Algeria: 62.0Tunisia: 61.5Morocco: 59.6Gabon: 58.8Angola: 58.4South Africa: 57.6Namibia: 55.8Kenya: 52.4Botswana: 51.1Eswatini: 51.1Ghana: 47.6Cameroon: 44.7Côte d’Ivoire: 43.9Ethiopia: 44.2Mauritania: 42.7Zambia: 41.8Zimbabwe: 41.6Senegal: 41.2Mozambique: 40.4Madagascar: 40.3Tanzania: 39.9Nigeria: 39.2Malawi: 36.6Chad: 35.6Benin: 35.4DR Congo: 33.5Niger: 27.7Niger 27.7Mauritius 65.3Americas21 comparedCanada: 81.0United States: 78.9Uruguay: 75.9Chile: 70.2Argentina: 70.0Costa Rica: 69.7Brazil: 68.3Ecuador: 67.7Panama: 67.0Peru: 65.8Colombia: 65.7Paraguay: 63.8Mexico: 63.6El Salvador: 62.5Bolivia: 61.6Guatemala: 59.3Dominican Republic: 58.1Trinidad and Tobago: 57.7Jamaica: 57.3Nicaragua: 52.9Honduras: 52.3Honduras 52.3Canada 81.0Asia37 comparedJapan: 75.0Israel: 74.1South Korea: 73.1United Arab Emirates: 70.3Singapore: 70.1Malaysia: 69.0Saudi Arabia: 66.9Cyprus: 65.8Qatar: 65.9Kuwait: 65.8Azerbaijan: 65.6Bahrain: 65.4Oman: 65.0Brunei: 64.8Georgia: 64.6Türkiye: 64.6China: 64.4Kazakhstan: 63.4Hong Kong: 62.5Vietnam: 61.9Armenia: 60.4Indonesia: 60.5Sri Lanka: 60.4Thailand: 60.1Iran: 59.8Jordan: 58.3Lebanon: 57.7Tajikistan: 57.5Philippines: 56.9India: 55.6Mongolia: 52.7Iraq: 52.2Cambodia: 47.7Myanmar: 46.5Bangladesh: 46.2Pakistan: 45.5Nepal: 40.5Nepal 40.5Japan 75.0Europe37 comparedDenmark: 83.2Sweden: 83.1Finland: 82.7Switzerland: 82.1Austria: 80.9France: 80.6Estonia: 80.2Germany: 80.2Norway: 79.9United Kingdom: 80.0Slovenia: 78.4Czechia: 78.0Spain: 77.8Netherlands: 77.6Hungary: 77.3Luxembourg: 77.3Belgium: 77.1Portugal: 76.7Slovakia: 76.6Ireland: 76.3Latvia: 76.3Croatia: 76.0Iceland: 76.1Romania: 75.1Lithuania: 75.0Italy: 74.3Poland: 70.7Greece: 70.5Malta: 70.4Bulgaria: 69.2Russia: 66.1Albania: 63.8Serbia: 63.7Montenegro: 63.5Bosnia and Herzegovina: 62.9North Macedonia: 59.9Moldova: 57.2Moldova 57.2Denmark 83.2Oceania2 comparedNew Zealand: 79.6Australia: 75.7Australia 75.7 · New Zealand 79.6middle country 63.8

04All 126 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first. “=” marks a rank shared with another country. Ranks are shared by design: the Council uses dense ranking and states that countries whose scores differ by less than 0.1 share a rank, so 126 countries occupy only 99 positions and Denmark and Sweden are both ranked 1.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 126 countries

  1. =1 of 126DenmarkNorthern Europe83.2
  2. =1 of 126SwedenNorthern Europe83.1
  3. 2 of 126FinlandNorthern Europe82.7
  4. 3 of 126SwitzerlandWestern Europe82.1
  5. 4 of 126CanadaNorthern America81.0
  6. 5 of 126AustriaWestern Europe80.9
  7. 6 of 126FranceWestern Europe80.6
  8. =7 of 126EstoniaNorthern Europe80.2
  9. =7 of 126GermanyWestern Europe80.2
  10. =8 of 126NorwayNorthern Europe79.9
  11. =8 of 126United KingdomNorthern Europe80.0
  12. 9 of 126New ZealandAustralia and New Zealand79.6
  13. 10 of 126United StatesNorthern America78.9
  14. 11 of 126SloveniaSouthern Europe78.4
  15. 12 of 126CzechiaEastern Europe78.0
  16. 13 of 126SpainSouthern Europe77.8
  17. 14 of 126NetherlandsWestern Europe77.6
  18. =15 of 126HungaryEastern Europe77.3
  19. =15 of 126LuxembourgWestern Europe77.3
  20. 16 of 126BelgiumWestern Europe77.1
  21. 17 of 126PortugalSouthern Europe76.7
  22. 18 of 126SlovakiaEastern Europe76.6
  23. =19 of 126IrelandNorthern Europe76.3
  24. =19 of 126LatviaNorthern Europe76.3
  25. =20 of 126CroatiaSouthern Europe76.0

Values for 2023.

05In this edition

World Energy Trilemma Index in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

06The parts of the index

Inside the number

World Energy Council publishes the parts the headline is built from. Each part’s highest and lowest country, and its middle value.

PartHighestLowestMiddle country
Energy security126 countriesCanada76.6Lebanon31.457.7
Energy equity126 countries3 countries share 99.9Malawi4.374.4
Environmental sustainability126 countriesSwitzerland85.7Trinidad and Tobago34.466.8

07The measure

About World Energy Trilemma Index

The World Energy Trilemma Index scores how well a country balances three goals that pull against each other: energy security, energy equity and environmental sustainability. The World Energy Council rates each out of 100 and combines them — all three dimensions are stored beside the overall score.

What the number is: Trilemma score (0–100).

08Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

A key statistic for Energy

“How a country's energy system balances security of supply, affordability and environmental impact — three pressures that trade off against one another.”

Edition used
2023 (data 2023)
Countries
126
Licence
Express reuse grant (no Creative Commons licence named)

Energy standingsHow the keys combine

Moves with

Where World Energy Trilemma Index is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where World Energy Trilemma Index is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 333 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

09Keep reading

Explore further

10Questions

World Energy Trilemma Index: questions and answers

Which country has the highest World Energy Trilemma Index?

Denmark, at 83.2, among the 126 countries compared in 2023.

Which country has the lowest World Energy Trilemma Index?

Niger, at 27.7, among the 126 countries compared in 2023.

How many countries does the World Energy Trilemma Index cover?

126 in 2023.

What is the world average World Energy Trilemma Index?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 126 compared in 2023, the figure was 63.8.

Is this World Energy Council’s own ranking?

Yes. The rank shown is the one World Energy Council publishes.

How often is the World Energy Trilemma Index published?

This site holds one edition, describing 2023.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From World Energy Council, under Express reuse grant (no Creative Commons licence named). From the 2023 Index, published as the World Energy Trilemma Report 2024. Seven tracked countries the Council leaves unranked — Barbados, Libya, Syria, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela and Yemen — are not included. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

11Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

World Energy Trilemma Index — World Energy Council

From the 2023 Index, published as the World Energy Trilemma Report 2024. Seven tracked countries the Council leaves unranked — Barbados, Libya, Syria, Taiwan, Ukraine, Venezuela and Yemen — are not included.

Newest edition

Report year 2023Data year 2023

Cite the source as: World Energy Council. World Energy Trilemma Index. London: World Energy Council. Used by permission of the World Energy Council.

Licence: Express reuse grant (no Creative Commons licence named), checked 2026-09-05.

The full 2023 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • The rank is World Energy Council’s own, as published.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Photographs

The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). World Energy Trilemma Index by country: World Energy Trilemma Index, data from World Energy Council. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/energy-trilemma

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.