Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance) · Births Attended by Skilled Health Staff

Births attended by skilled staff by country

What share of births are attended by a doctor, nurse or midwife?

14 countries shared first place of the 84 countries compared in 2023, all at 100.0%, and Yemen last, at 60.9%. In the middle country the figure was 99.3%.

Share

Part ofHealth & WellbeingGender & Equality

Births attended by skilled staff · 2023

Context statistic

14 countries share the highest value, 100.0% — no single country is named first.

012023 · position · derived

Who leads

The three countries at the highest end of 84 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

Highest in 2023 · shared

14 countries share the highest reading, 100.0%

No single country is named first: picking one from a shared value would be a choice the data does not make.

Lowest in 2023

  1. 84Yemen60.9%
  2. 83Mali65.5%
  3. =81Mozambique67.5%

Positions out of 84. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Highest on each continent

02Every measured country

Births attended by skilled staff on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a higher value — the better end.

  • 60.9–96.7%
  • 97.2–98.7%
  • 98.8–99.6%
  • 99.7–99.9%
  • 100.0%
  • No reading in 2023 (109 measured in an earlier edition)
  • Asia

    99.7%

    the middle country, of 22 measured · 52 members

    5 share 100.0%

    Yemen60.9%

    Highest and lowest reading in Asia.

  • Europe

    99.6%

    the middle country, of 23 measured · 49 members

    North Macedonia100.0%

    Germany96.4%

    Highest and lowest reading in Europe.

  • Americas

    99.1%

    the middle country, of 28 measured · 48 members

    8 share 100.0%

    Haiti75.6%

    Highest and lowest reading in Americas.

  • Oceania

    98.0%

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 21 members

    Palau99.5%

    Vanuatu90.9%

    Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.

  • Africa

    90.6%

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 55 members

    Mauritius99.8%

    Mali65.5%

    Highest and lowest reading in Africa.

19 sub-regions, highest middle country first
  • Caribbean

    100.0%

    the middle country, of 14 measured · 24 members

    7 share 100.0%

    Haiti75.6%

    Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.

  • Southern Europe

    99.9%

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 17 members

    North Macedonia100.0%

    Portugal98.6%

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.

  • Western Asia

    99.9%

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 19 members

    4 share 100.0%

    Yemen60.9%

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.

  • Eastern Europe

    99.6%

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 10 members

    Belarus99.9%

    Slovakia97.2%

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Northern Europe

    98.8%

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 13 members

    Estonia99.9%

    Denmark96.7%

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.

  • South America

    98.2%

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 12 members

    Uruguay100.0%

    Peru94.8%

    Highest and lowest reading in South America.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    Australia98.5%

    New Zealand96.3%

    Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Central America

    2 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: Belize, Costa Rica.

    Costa Rica98.9%

    Belize95.4%

    Highest and lowest reading in Central America.

  • Central Asia

    2 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan.

    Kyrgyzstan99.8%

    Tajikistan97.6%

    Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.

  • Eastern Africa

    2 of 19 measured — too few for a middle: Mauritius, Mozambique.

    Mauritius99.8%

    Mozambique67.5%

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Eastern Asia

    2 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: Japan, Mongolia.

    Mongolia100.0%

    Japan99.8%

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Melanesia

    1 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Vanuatu.

    Vanuatu90.9%

    Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.

  • Micronesia

    2 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Nauru, Palau.

    Palau99.5%

    Nauru98.0%

    Highest and lowest reading in Micronesia.

  • Northern Africa

    1 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Tunisia.

    Tunisia98.0%

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Northern America

    3 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Bermuda, Canada, United States.

    Bermuda99.3%

    Canada97.8%

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.

  • South-eastern Asia

    4 of 11 measured — too few for a middle: Brunei, Indonesia, Laos, Singapore.

    Brunei99.6%

    Laos79.8%

    Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Southern Asia

    4 of 9 measured — too few for a middle: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Iran.

    Iran99.0%

    Afghanistan67.5%

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Western Africa

    3 of 16 measured — too few for a middle: Ghana, Mali, Senegal.

    Senegal93.5%

    Mali65.5%

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.

  • Western Europe

    2 of 9 measured — too few for a middle: France, Germany.

    France97.6%

    Germany96.4%

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.

03The whole field at once

The spread

84 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 99.3%; a quarter are above 99.9%, and a quarter below 97.8%. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

70%80%90%100%Africa6 comparedMauritius: 99.8%Tunisia: 98.0%Senegal: 93.5%Ghana: 87.6%Mozambique: 67.5%Mali: 65.5%Mali 65.5%Mauritius 99.8%Americas28 comparedUruguay: 100.0%Montserrat: 100.0%Anguilla: 100.0%Dominica: 100.0%Saint Kitts and Nevis: 100.0%Saint Lucia: 100.0%Grenada: 100.0%Trinidad and Tobago: 100.0%Dominican Republic: 99.9%Cuba: 99.7%Argentina: 99.3%Bermuda: 99.3%Barbados: 99.3%Bahamas: 99.2%Antigua and Barbuda: 99.0%Costa Rica: 98.9%United States: 98.8%Jamaica: 98.8%Brazil: 98.5%Bolivia: 98.3%Paraguay: 98.2%Guyana: 98.0%Canada: 97.8%Colombia: 97.8%Ecuador: 96.7%Belize: 95.4%Peru: 94.8%Haiti: 75.6%Haiti 75.6%Trinidad and Tobago 100.0%Asia22 comparedBahrain: 100.0%Qatar: 100.0%Kuwait: 100.0%Oman: 100.0%Mongolia: 100.0%Jordan: 99.9%Georgia: 99.8%Japan: 99.8%Azerbaijan: 99.8%Kyrgyzstan: 99.8%Saudi Arabia: 99.8%Brunei: 99.6%Singapore: 99.5%Israel: 99.5%Iran: 99.0%Bhutan: 98.5%Tajikistan: 97.6%Indonesia: 95.7%Laos: 79.8%Bangladesh: 69.7%Afghanistan: 67.5%Yemen: 60.9%Yemen 60.9%Mongolia 100.0%Europe23 comparedNorth Macedonia: 100.0%Estonia: 99.9%Bosnia and Herzegovina: 99.9%Italy: 99.9%Belarus: 99.9%Croatia: 99.9%Spain: 99.9%Malta: 99.8%Serbia: 99.8%Greece: 99.7%Russia: 99.7%Moldova: 99.6%Poland: 99.6%Finland: 99.5%Norway: 99.2%Hungary: 98.7%Portugal: 98.6%Latvia: 98.4%Iceland: 97.6%France: 97.6%Slovakia: 97.2%Denmark: 96.7%Germany: 96.4%Germany 96.4% · North Macedonia 100.0%Oceania5 comparedPalau: 99.5%Australia: 98.5%Nauru: 98.0%New Zealand: 96.3%Vanuatu: 90.9%Vanuatu 90.9% · Palau 99.5%middle country 99.3%

04All 193 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance) ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. Many high-income countries sit at or near 100% and stop being distinguishable — in 2023, 14 countries report that every birth is attended and share position 1. The spread that matters is at the bottom.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 193 countries

  1. =1 of 84AnguillaCaribbean100.0%
  2. =1 of 84BahrainWestern Asia100.0%
  3. =1 of 84DominicaCaribbean100.0%
  4. =1 of 84GrenadaCaribbean100.0%
  5. =1 of 84KuwaitWestern Asia100.0%
  6. =1 of 84MongoliaEastern Asia100.0%
  7. =1 of 84MontserratCaribbean100.0%
  8. =1 of 84North MacedoniaSouthern Europe100.0%
  9. =1 of 84OmanWestern Asia100.0%
  10. =1 of 84QatarWestern Asia100.0%
  11. =1 of 84Saint Kitts and NevisCaribbean100.0%
  12. =1 of 84Saint LuciaCaribbean100.0%
  13. =1 of 84Trinidad and TobagoCaribbean100.0%
  14. =1 of 84UruguaySouth America100.0%
  15. =15 of 84BelarusEastern Europe99.9%
  16. =15 of 84Bosnia and HerzegovinaSouthern Europe99.9%
  17. =15 of 84CroatiaSouthern Europe99.9%
  18. =15 of 84Dominican RepublicCaribbean99.9%
  19. =15 of 84EstoniaNorthern Europe99.9%
  20. =15 of 84ItalySouthern Europe99.9%
  21. =15 of 84JordanWestern Asia99.9%
  22. =15 of 84SpainSouthern Europe99.9%
  23. =23 of 84AzerbaijanWestern Asia99.8%
  24. =23 of 84GeorgiaWestern Asia99.8%
  25. =23 of 84JapanEastern Asia99.8%

Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

052000–2023 · 24 editions

Over time

Each point is one reference year from 2000. A country appears in a year only if it reported that year, so the set of countries changes along the line.

50%60%70%80%90%200020032006200920122015201820212023AsiaEuropeAmericasOceaniaAfrica
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 28 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
20238499.3%97.8% – 99.9%99.3%
20229299.0%96.6% – 99.8%99.1%
20219999.3%96.6% – 99.9%99.1%
20209899.4%96.8% – 99.9%99.2%
201911099.0%95.1% – 99.8%99.5%
201811199.1%94.9% – 99.8%99.4%
201710099.5%95.0% – 99.9%99.5%
201610899.1%94.4% – 99.8%99.1%
201510599.1%95.4% – 99.9%99.4%
201412098.9%93.3% – 99.8%99.5%
201310898.8%96.0% – 99.8%99.1%
201211599.0%95.5% – 99.8%99.2%
201111298.8%91.9% – 99.8%99.2%
201011898.6%90.0% – 99.8%99.2%
200910999.3%97.5% – 99.8%99.5%
200810799.1%94.6% – 99.8%99.4%
200711398.6%92.7% – 99.7%99.3%
200612797.6%78.9% – 99.6%99.4%
200511298.7%91.0% – 99.8%99.3%
20049898.8%95.8% – 99.8%99.3%
20039898.9%90.3% – 99.7%99.3%
20029299.1%96.9% – 99.8%99.3%
20018498.6%92.1% – 99.7%99.3%
200014196.8%65.4% – 99.4%99.3%

062022 → 2023

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Bolivia71.5% → 98.3% · 88th → 57th+26.8
  2. Haiti67.9% → 75.6% · 91st → 79th+7.7
  3. Paraguay92.9% → 98.2% · 78th → 58th+5.3
  4. Portugal97.3% → 98.6% · 64th → 52nd+1.3
  5. Trinidad and Tobago98.8% → 100.0% · 48th → 1st+1.2

Declined most

before → after
  1. Slovakia98.1% → 97.2% · 58th → 67th−0.9
  2. Bermuda99.8% → 99.3% · 20th → 41st−0.5
  3. Jamaica99.3% → 98.8% · 39th → 49th−0.5
  4. Colombia98.0% → 97.8% · 61st → 62nd−0.2
  5. Greece99.9% → 99.7% · 14th → 31st−0.2

61 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023. The field changed from 92 to 84 countries, so a place can move for reasons that have nothing to do with the country itself.

07Across every edition

Births attended by skilled staff in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08The measure

About births attended by skilled staff

This is the share of births attended by a doctor, nurse or midwife — close to a single measure of whether a health system reaches women at the moment they most need it. It pairs directly with under-five mortality, and the two rise and fall together.

What the number is: Births attended by skilled health staff (%).

09Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Health & Wellbeing and Gender & Equality, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

Health & WellbeingGender & EqualityWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where births attended by skilled staff is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where births attended by skilled staff is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 101 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

10Keep reading

Explore further

11Questions

Births attended by skilled staff: questions and answers

Which country has the highest births attended by skilled staff?

14 countries share the highest reading, 100.0%, among the 84 compared in 2023, so no single country is named.

Which country has the lowest births attended by skilled staff?

Yemen, at 60.9%, among the 84 countries compared in 2023.

How many countries does the Births Attended by Skilled Health Staff cover?

84 in 2023, and 193 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 84 to 141 between editions.

What is the world average births attended by skilled staff?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 84 compared in 2023, the figure was 99.3%.

Is this UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance)’s own ranking?

No. UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance) publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.

How often is the Births Attended by Skilled Health Staff published?

This site holds 24 editions, describing 2000 to 2023.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance), under CC BY 3.0 IGO. From the Joint UNICEF-WHO Database on Skilled Birth Attendance, read from UNICEF’s own data warehouse. Survey and registration readings, so the country set changes from year to year: a country missing from an edition did not report that year, and its care did not lapse. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

12Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

Births Attended by Skilled Health Staff — UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance)

From the Joint UNICEF-WHO Database on Skilled Birth Attendance, read from UNICEF’s own data warehouse. Survey and registration readings, so the country set changes from year to year: a country missing from an edition did not report that year, and its care did not lapse.

Newest edition

Report year 2023Data year 2023

Cite the source as: UNICEF and WHO. Joint UNICEF-WHO Database on Skilled Birth Attendance. New York: UNICEF. Read from UNICEF’s SDMX data warehouse (MNCH_SAB).

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO, checked 2026-10-02.

The full 2023 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance) ranks nobody on this measure. The position is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values; equal values share a position.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Births attended by skilled staff by country: Births Attended by Skilled Health Staff, data from UNICEF and WHO (Joint Database on Skilled Birth Attendance). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/skilled-birth-attendance

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.