Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
FSIN · Global Report on Food Crises
What share of an analysed population faces crisis-level hunger or worse?
Of the 44 countries compared in 2024, El Salvador had the lowest reading, 3.0%, and South Sudan had the highest reading, 56.0%. In the middle country the figure was 22.0%. Among the 29 countries measured in every edition since 2016, the middle one moved from 12.0% to 22.0%.
Acute food insecurity · 2024
Context statistic
Lowest of 44El Salvador
3.0%012024 · position · derived
The three countries at the lowest end of 44 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1
2
3Photo: Rod Waddington from Kergunyah, Australia · CC BY-SA 2.0, greyscale
Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
2 countries share 5.0%
El Salvador3.0%
Myanmar25.0%
Ukraine15.0%
1 of 49 measured
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a lower value — the better end.
18.0%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 48 members
El Salvador3.0%
Haiti48.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Americas.
20.4%
the middle country, of 31 measured · 55 members
2 share 5.0%
South Sudan56.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Africa.
32.0%
the middle country, of 7 measured · 52 members
Myanmar25.0%
Yemen48.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Asia.
1 of 49 measured — too few for a middle: Ukraine.
Ukraine15.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Europe.
12.0%
the middle country, of 9 measured · 16 members
Senegal5.0%
Sierra Leone20.4%
Lowest and highest reading in Western Africa.
22.0%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 9 members
Cameroon11.0%
Central African Republic41.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Middle Africa.
23.0%
the middle country, of 13 measured · 19 members
Uganda5.0%
South Sudan56.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.
1 of 24 measured — too few for a middle: Haiti.
Haiti48.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Caribbean.
3 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras.
El Salvador3.0%
Honduras19.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Central America.
1 of 10 measured — too few for a middle: Ukraine.
Ukraine15.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.
1 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Sudan.
Sudan54.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Africa.
1 of 12 measured — too few for a middle: Colombia.
Colombia15.0%
Lowest and highest reading in South America.
1 of 11 measured — too few for a middle: Myanmar.
Myanmar25.0%
Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.
3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia.
Eswatini25.0%
Namibia41.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Africa.
3 of 9 measured — too few for a middle: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan.
Bangladesh26.0%
Afghanistan36.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.
3 of 19 measured — too few for a middle: Lebanon, Syria, Yemen.
Lebanon30.0%
Yemen48.0%
Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.
03The whole field at once
44 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 22.0%; a quarter are above 31.3%, and a quarter below 13.8%. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 55 ever measured
In order, highest value first — position 1 is the highest value, the way FSIN’s own tables read. “=” marks a position shared with another country. Food Security Information Network (FSIN) ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. The share is of the population FSIN analysed, not of the country, which is how FSIN computes it — reading it as a national percentage would overstate every figure. And this is not a world ranking: only countries already in acute food crisis are assessed, so an absent country usually has no crisis.
Showing 25 of 55 countries
Values for 2024. The change column compares 2024 with 2023 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
052016–2024 · 9 editions
Each point is one annual edition, and each describes the PREVIOUS year — which is why the report year and the data year differ throughout.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 44 | 22.0% | 13.8% – 31.3% | 22.0% |
| 2023 | 45 | 23.0% | 13.0% – 32.0% | 22.0% |
| 2022 | 44 | 20.0% | 12.0% – 30.8% | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 41 | 20.0% | 10.0% – 35.0% | 21.0% |
| 2020 | 42 | 16.0% | 10.0% – 30.8% | 16.0% |
| 2019 | 41 | 15.0% | 4.0% – 32.0% | 22.0% |
| 2018 | 40 | 11.0% | 5.0% – 25.3% | 14.0% |
| 2017 | 42 | 13.5% | 7.0% – 30.8% | 24.0% |
| 2016 | 41 | 9.0% | 3.0% – 24.0% | 12.0% |
062023 → 2024
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
44 countries were measured in both 2023 and 2024. The field changed from 45 to 44 countries, so a place can move for reasons that have nothing to do with the country itself.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
89.0%
In IPC Phase 3+ (% of analysed population)
Lowest reading on record
Reached 4 times by 3 countries — shared, so no holder is named
0.0%
In IPC Phase 3+ (% of analysed population)
Biggest improvement between editions
−58.0
89.0% → 31.0%
Biggest decline between editions
+57.0
27.0% → 84.0%
Most improved since first measured
−30.0
52.0% → 22.0%
At the top most often
2 of 9
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
The Global Report on Food Crises measures the share of an analysed population in IPC Phase 3 or above — crisis-level acute food insecurity or worse. Compiled by the Food Security Information Network, it is the reference document for where famine risk is being tracked.
What the number is: In IPC Phase 3+ (% of analysed population).
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Health & Wellbeing and Development & Human Capital, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Health & WellbeingDevelopment & Human CapitalWhich statistics vote, and why
Where acute food insecurity is higher, these tend to be higher too.
No statistic lines up this closely.
Where acute food insecurity is higher, these tend to be lower.
No statistic lines up this closely.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 0 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
El Salvador, at 3.0%, among the 44 countries compared in 2024.
South Sudan, at 56.0%, among the 44 countries compared in 2024.
44 in 2024, and 55 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 40 to 45 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 44 compared in 2024, the figure was 22.0%.
No. Food Security Information Network (FSIN) publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds 9 editions, describing 2016 to 2024.
From Food Security Information Network (FSIN), under CC BY 4.0. From FSIN’s published GRFC tables, using only its own whole-country rows marked as included in the report. Where FSIN reports a country solely as sub-populations it is absent rather than summed — Palestine is the case that matters, published as Gaza Strip and West Bank with no combined figure. Every edition is available on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, unrounded.
12Method
Global Report on Food Crises — Food Security Information Network (FSIN)
From FSIN’s published GRFC tables, using only its own whole-country rows marked as included in the report. Where FSIN reports a country solely as sub-populations it is absent rather than summed — Palestine is the case that matters, published as Gaza Strip and West Bank with no combined figure.
Newest edition
Report year 2025Data year 2024
Cite the source as: Food Security Information Network. Global Report on Food Crises. Rome: FSIN and Global Network Against Food Crises.
Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-05.
9 editions (2017–2025), covering 40 to 45 countries. The figure is the share of people in IPC/CH Phase 3 or above - crisis-level acute food insecurity or worse - with the headcount and the size of the analysed population stored beside it. ⚠ THE SHARE IS OF THE POPULATION FSIN ANALYSED, NOT OF THE COUNTRY. That is how FSIN computes it, and reading it as a national percentage would overstate every figure. ⚠ THIS IS THE THINNEST INDICATOR ON THE SITE and it is not a world ranking: only countries in acute food crisis are assessed, so a country absent from it usually has no food crisis - the opposite of a bad result. ⚠ Each edition describes the PREVIOUS year, which is why the report year and the data year differ throughout. ⚠ Only FSIN’s own “whole country” rows that it marked as included in the report are used. Where FSIN reports a country only as sub-populations it is absent rather than summed - Palestine is the case that matters, published as Gaza Strip and West Bank with no combined figure. ⚠ ⚠ No rank is published. A POSITION is derived here (2026-09-10) by ordering the share of the analysed population in IPC Phase 3+. ⚠ THE FIELD IS THE CRISIS LIST, NOT THE WORLD: the GRFC analyses only the 44 countries already in acute food crisis, so the last position is the least-affected country IT looked at, and a country’s absence from the table means it was never assessed.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Acute food insecurity by country: Global Report on Food Crises, data from Food Security Information Network (FSIN). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/food-crises