Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Government Censorship of the Media
Does the government try to censor newspapers, radio and television?
Belgium placed first of the 176 countries compared in 2025, at 3.489, and South Sudan last, at -3.017. In the middle country the figure was 0.565. Among the 168 countries measured in every edition since 1990, the middle one moved from 0.080 to 0.565.
Part ofDemocracy & Civil Liberties
Media censorship · 2025
Context statistic
Highest of 176Belgium
3.489012025 · position · derived
The three countries at the highest end of 176 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: Gf uip · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
2Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
3Photo: Andrus Uuetalu derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 3.0 ee, greyscale
Positions out of 176. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
Sierra Leone1.867
Canada3.016
Sri Lanka1.961
Belgium3.489
New Zealand2.946
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a higher value — the better end.
1.867
the middle country, of 6 measured · 21 members
New Zealand2.946
Fiji0.549
Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.
1.281
the middle country, of 40 measured · 49 members
Belgium3.489
Belarus-2.822
Highest and lowest reading in Europe.
1.252
the middle country, of 27 measured · 48 members
Canada3.016
Nicaragua-2.207
Highest and lowest reading in Americas.
0.061
the middle country, of 55 measured · 55 members
Sierra Leone1.867
South Sudan-3.017
Highest and lowest reading in Africa.
-0.221
the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members
Sri Lanka1.961
Myanmar-2.954
Highest and lowest reading in Asia.
2.744
the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members
Denmark3.258
United Kingdom1.279
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.
2.308
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
Belgium3.489
Netherlands1.253
Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.
1.846
the middle country, of 6 measured · 24 members
Jamaica2.161
Cuba-2.048
Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.
1.309
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Botswana1.825
Eswatini-1.784
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.
1.117
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
South Korea1.867
North Korea-2.775
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.
1.081
the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members
Brazil2.958
Venezuela-2.041
Highest and lowest reading in South America.
0.827
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
Guatemala1.727
Nicaragua-2.207
Highest and lowest reading in Central America.
0.737
the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members
Sierra Leone1.867
Guinea-Bissau-0.935
Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.
0.722
the middle country, of 13 measured · 17 members
Portugal3.187
Serbia-1.939
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.
0.614
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Sri Lanka1.961
Afghanistan-2.547
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.
0.165
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Czechia2.163
Belarus-2.822
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.
-0.344
the middle country, of 10 measured · 11 members
Timor-Leste1.187
Myanmar-2.954
Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.
-0.346
the middle country, of 19 measured · 19 members
Kenya1.721
South Sudan-3.017
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.
-0.420
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
São Tomé and Príncipe1.019
Republic of the Congo-2.127
Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.
-0.515
the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members
Tunisia1.088
Egypt-1.938
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.
-0.740
the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members
Georgia0.789
Azerbaijan-2.273
Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.
-1.119
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Kyrgyzstan-0.388
Turkmenistan-2.720
Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
New Zealand2.946
Australia2.216
Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.
Vanuatu2.451
Fiji0.549
Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada3.016
United States0.875
Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.
03The whole field at once
176 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 0.565; a quarter are above 1.386, and a quarter below -0.676. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 176 ever measured
In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. ⚠ Higher is better here, though the name reads the other way. The figure measures government attempts to censor, not the overall health of the press: harassment of journalists, self-censorship and the range of views in the media are separate V-Dem measures, and online censorship is not included.
Showing 25 of 176 countries
Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
051990–2025 · 36 reference years
Each point is one year from 1990, all of them re-estimated together in V-Dem's v16 release. The scale has no fixed ends, so read the movement and the gap to other countries rather than the number on its own.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 176 | 0.565 | -0.676 – 1.386 | 0.565 |
| 2024 | 176 | 0.539 | -0.800 – 1.428 | 0.547 |
| 2023 | 176 | 0.616 | -0.819 – 1.397 | 0.560 |
| 2022 | 176 | 0.704 | -0.688 – 1.506 | 0.633 |
| 2021 | 176 | 0.529 | -0.669 – 1.593 | 0.513 |
| 2020 | 176 | 0.682 | -0.520 – 1.603 | 0.582 |
| 2019 | 176 | 0.824 | -0.521 – 1.665 | 0.807 |
| 2018 | 176 | 0.841 | -0.508 – 1.591 | 0.828 |
| 2017 | 176 | 0.807 | -0.650 – 1.737 | 0.807 |
| 2016 | 176 | 0.858 | -0.632 – 1.674 | 0.858 |
| 2015 | 176 | 0.946 | -0.545 – 1.810 | 0.946 |
| 2014 | 176 | 0.974 | -0.479 – 1.810 | 0.974 |
| 2013 | 176 | 0.970 | -0.418 – 1.810 | 0.970 |
| 2012 | 176 | 0.910 | -0.309 – 1.988 | 0.910 |
| 2011 | 176 | 0.880 | -0.352 – 2.009 | 0.918 |
| 2010 | 175 | 0.820 | -0.357 – 1.964 | 0.823 |
| 2009 | 175 | 0.776 | -0.440 – 1.896 | 0.793 |
| 2008 | 175 | 0.776 | -0.449 – 1.748 | 0.782 |
| 2007 | 175 | 0.776 | -0.397 – 1.785 | 0.771 |
| 2006 | 175 | 0.794 | -0.344 – 1.769 | 0.791 |
| 2005 | 175 | 0.788 | -0.332 – 1.785 | 0.782 |
| 2004 | 175 | 0.744 | -0.352 – 1.785 | 0.726 |
| 2003 | 175 | 0.695 | -0.352 – 1.878 | 0.631 |
| 2002 | 175 | 0.767 | -0.419 – 1.878 | 0.740 |
| 2001 | 175 | 0.776 | -0.534 – 1.878 | 0.693 |
| 2000 | 175 | 0.776 | -0.487 – 1.878 | 0.748 |
| 1999 | 175 | 0.585 | -0.662 – 1.726 | 0.549 |
| 1998 | 174 | 0.537 | -0.650 – 1.757 | 0.537 |
| 1997 | 173 | 0.536 | -0.674 – 1.763 | 0.531 |
| 1996 | 173 | 0.526 | -0.674 – 1.772 | 0.520 |
| 1995 | 173 | 0.526 | -0.665 – 1.894 | 0.520 |
| 1994 | 173 | 0.526 | -0.665 – 1.808 | 0.520 |
| 1993 | 173 | 0.515 | -0.665 – 1.772 | 0.514 |
| 1992 | 172 | 0.441 | -0.694 – 1.772 | 0.441 |
| 1991 | 171 | 0.387 | -0.968 – 1.707 | 0.327 |
| 1990 | 168 | 0.080 | -1.202 – 1.649 | 0.080 |
062024 → 2025
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
176 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
3.489
Original latent estimate (≈ −3 to +3.5); higher = less censorship
Lowest reading on record
-3.066
Original latent estimate (≈ −3 to +3.5); higher = less censorship
Biggest improvement between editions
+3.999
-2.741 → 1.258
Biggest decline between editions
−3.978
1.024 → -2.954
Most improved since first measured
+3.414
-2.227 → 1.187
At the top most often
36 of 36
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
V-Dem's measure of media censorship asks whether a government tries to censor newspapers, radio and television, either directly or through indirect pressure such as licences, advertising and control of printing. It is an expert-coded estimate on an open-ended scale centred near zero, and a higher figure means less censorship.
What the number is: Original latent estimate (≈ −3 to +3.5); higher = less censorship.
What it does not measure
It covers government attempts to censor print and broadcast media; online censorship, harassment of journalists and self-censorship are measured separately.
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Democracy & Civil Liberties, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Where media censorship is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where media censorship is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 187 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
Belgium, at 3.489, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.
South Sudan, at -3.017, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.
176 in 2025. The number measured varies from 168 to 176 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 176 compared in 2025, the figure was 0.565.
No. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds 36 reference years, 1990–2025, all recalculated in V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s 2026 report on one method — not 36 separate publications.
From V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, under CC BY-SA 4.0. From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country. Stored as the measurement model's original estimate, not V-Dem's 0–4 rescaling. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.
12Method
Government Censorship of the Media — V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country. Stored as the measurement model's original estimate, not V-Dem's 0–4 rescaling.
Newest edition
Report year 2025Data year 2025
Cite the source as: Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v16. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, University of Gothenburg.
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, checked 2026-09-26.
The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Media censorship by country: Government Censorship of the Media, data from V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/media-censorship