Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
OECD · Social Institutions and Gender Index
How much do laws, customs and attitudes discriminate against women?
Of the 140 countries compared in 2023, Norway had the lowest reading, 6.7, and Mauritania had the highest reading, 67.4. In the middle country the figure was 25.2.
Social Institutions and Gender Index · 2023
Key statistic · Gender & Equality
Lowest of 140Norway
6.7012023 · position · derived
The three countries at the lowest end of 140 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: Ximonic , Simo Räsänen · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
2Photo: Gf uip · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
3Photo: User:Pieter Kuiper · Public domain, greyscale
Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
Côte d’Ivoire17.3
Costa Rica10.9
Taiwan9.2
Norway6.7
New Zealand14.0
2 of 21 measured
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a lower value — the better end.
13.1
the middle country, of 36 measured · 49 members
Norway6.7
Bosnia and Herzegovina27.1
Lowest and highest reading in Europe.
19.5
the middle country, of 24 measured · 48 members
Costa Rica10.9
Haiti46.4
Lowest and highest reading in Americas.
33.4
the middle country, of 36 measured · 52 members
Taiwan9.2
Iran62.9
Lowest and highest reading in Asia.
38.9
the middle country, of 42 measured · 55 members
Côte d’Ivoire17.3
Mauritania67.4
Lowest and highest reading in Africa.
2 of 21 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
New Zealand14.0
Australia15.4
Lowest and highest reading in Oceania.
9.9
the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members
Belgium7.4
Germany12.4
Lowest and highest reading in Western Europe.
12.3
the middle country, of 9 measured · 13 members
Norway6.7
Denmark15.2
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Europe.
15.5
the middle country, of 8 measured · 10 members
Moldova11.0
Bulgaria18.9
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.
16.9
the middle country, of 13 measured · 17 members
Albania8.9
Bosnia and Herzegovina27.1
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Europe.
20.0
the middle country, of 10 measured · 12 members
Venezuela16.5
Chile27.2
Lowest and highest reading in South America.
20.4
the middle country, of 8 measured · 8 members
Costa Rica10.9
Honduras26.0
Lowest and highest reading in Central America.
22.9
the middle country, of 6 measured · 8 members
Taiwan9.2
Japan32.9
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Asia.
32.2
the middle country, of 14 measured · 19 members
Rwanda19.0
Comoros54.7
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.
38.9
the middle country, of 14 measured · 16 members
Côte d’Ivoire17.3
Mauritania67.4
Lowest and highest reading in Western Africa.
44.6
the middle country, of 9 measured · 11 members
Cambodia21.7
Malaysia60.7
Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.
46.0
the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members
Angola25.9
Cameroon66.9
Lowest and highest reading in Middle Africa.
49.3
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
Nepal30.6
Iran62.9
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.
51.0
the middle country, of 11 measured · 19 members
Armenia23.7
Qatar60.1
Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
New Zealand14.0
Australia15.4
Lowest and highest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 24 measured — too few for a middle: Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago.
Dominican Republic14.8
Haiti46.4
Lowest and highest reading in Caribbean.
3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan.
Kazakhstan20.9
Tajikistan40.0
Lowest and highest reading in Central Asia.
4 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Egypt, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia.
Tunisia46.5
Sudan64.6
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Africa.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada17.5
United States19.1
Lowest and highest reading in Northern America.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa.
South Africa23.0
Lesotho32.8
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Africa.
03The whole field at once
140 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 25.2; a quarter are above 40.6, and a quarter below 16.8. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 140 ever measured
In order, highest value first — position 1 is the highest value, the way OECD’s own tables read. “=” marks a position shared with another country. OECD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. A higher score is worse, so position 1 is the MOST discriminatory country, not the least: the table opens on Mauritania at 67.4 and closes on Norway at 6.7. Its four dimensions are stored beside the headline.
Showing 25 of 140 countries
Values for 2023.
05In this edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading
67.4
SIGI score (0 = no discrimination, 100 = absolute)
Lowest reading
6.7
SIGI score (0 = no discrimination, 100 = absolute)
06The parts of the index
OECD publishes the parts the headline is built from. Each part’s highest and lowest country, and its middle value.
| Part | Highest | Lowest | Middle country |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discrimination in the family (0–100)140 countries | 2 countries share 89.9 | 5 countries share 0.0 | 28.0 |
| Restricted physical integrity (0–100)140 countries | 26.0 | ||
| Restricted access to productive and financial resources (0–100)140 countries | 24.0 | ||
| Restricted civil liberties (0–100)140 countries | 19.2 |
07The measure
The OECD’s Social Institutions and Gender Index scores discrimination against women in law and custom, from 0 (none) to 100 (absolute). Its inputs are legal codes, inheritance rules, attitudes to violence and restrictions on movement — the causes, where the other gender measures here count the results.
What the number is: SIGI score (0 = no discrimination, 100 = absolute).
What it does not measure
It measures discrimination built into social institutions, not women's outcomes in health, schooling or income, which other statistics on this site cover.
08Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
A key statistic for Gender & Equality
“Discrimination in social institutions and norms. Correlates 0.850 with Women, Business and the Law, inside the 0.92 bar, and kept because law and custom diverge widely.”
Where Social Institutions and Gender Index is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where Social Institutions and Gender Index is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 115 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
09Keep reading
10Questions
Norway, at 6.7, among the 140 countries compared in 2023.
Mauritania, at 67.4, among the 140 countries compared in 2023.
140 in 2023.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 140 compared in 2023, the figure was 25.2.
No. OECD publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds one edition, describing 2023.
From OECD, under OECD Terms and Conditions — data clause. From the OECD Development Centre via its SDMX API. A different question from the Gender Inequality Index, Women Business and the Law and the Gender Development Index rather than a fourth answer to the same one. Every edition is available on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, unrounded.
11Method
Social Institutions and Gender Index — OECD
From the OECD Development Centre via its SDMX API. A different question from the Gender Inequality Index, Women Business and the Law and the Gender Development Index rather than a fourth answer to the same one.
Newest edition
Report year 2023Data year 2023
Cite the source as: OECD. Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) 2023. Paris: OECD Development Centre.
Licence: OECD Terms and Conditions — data clause, checked 2026-09-07.
1 edition (2023), covering 140 countries, from the OECD Development Centre via its SDMX API. ⚠ IT MEASURES DISCRIMINATION IN LAW AND CUSTOM, not outcomes — its inputs are legal codes, inheritance rules, attitudes to violence and restrictions on movement, where every other gender indicator on this site (the Gender Inequality Index, Women Business and the Law, the Gender Development Index) measures results such as pay, schooling or seats. That makes it a different question rather than a fourth answer to the same one. ⚠ A HIGHER SCORE IS WORSE: 0 is no discrimination and 100 is absolute, so position 1 is the most discriminatory country, not the least: the table opens on Mauritania at 67.4 and ends on Norway at 6.7. Its four dimensions — discrimination in the family, restricted physical integrity, restricted access to productive and financial resources, and restricted civil liberties — are stored beside the headline. ⚠ ONE EDITION. The OECD publishes SIGI every four or five years (2014, 2019, 2023) but exposes only the 2023 edition as data; the earlier ones exist as report annexes and are not transcribed by hand. ⚠ No rank is published, so none is stored; the POSITION shown on the statistics page is derived here by ordering the score, and labelled as ours.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Social Institutions and Gender Index by country: Social Institutions and Gender Index, data from OECD. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/sigi