Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Deliberative Democracy Index
Are political decisions reached through reasoned public debate?
Denmark placed first of the 176 countries compared in 2025, at 0.867, and North Korea last, at 0.011. In the middle country the figure was 0.339. Among the 167 countries measured in every edition since 1990, the middle one moved from 0.225 to 0.330.
Part ofDemocracy & Civil Liberties
Deliberative democracy · 2025
Context statistic
Highest of 176Denmark
0.867012025 · position · derived
The three countries at the highest end of 176 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
2Photo: Ximonic , Simo Räsänen · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
3Photo: Simon Koopmann derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 2.0 de, greyscale
Positions out of 176. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
Seychelles0.703
Costa Rica0.787
South Korea0.751
Denmark0.867
Australia0.771
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a higher value — the better end.
0.658
the middle country, of 40 measured · 49 members
Denmark0.867
Belarus0.032
Highest and lowest reading in Europe.
0.458
the middle country, of 27 measured · 48 members
Costa Rica0.787
Nicaragua0.017
Highest and lowest reading in Americas.
0.437
the middle country, of 6 measured · 21 members
Australia0.771
Papua New Guinea0.248
Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.
0.228
the middle country, of 55 measured · 55 members
Seychelles0.703
Sudan0.023
Highest and lowest reading in Africa.
0.182
the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members
South Korea0.751
North Korea0.011
Highest and lowest reading in Asia.
0.790
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
Switzerland0.852
Austria0.729
Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.
0.760
the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members
Denmark0.867
Lithuania0.662
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.
0.625
the middle country, of 6 measured · 24 members
Barbados0.712
Cuba0.097
Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.
0.521
the middle country, of 13 measured · 17 members
Spain0.693
Serbia0.208
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.
0.464
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
South Africa0.651
Eswatini0.064
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.
0.448
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
South Korea0.751
North Korea0.011
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.
0.393
the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members
Uruguay0.784
Venezuela0.023
Highest and lowest reading in South America.
0.358
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
Costa Rica0.787
Nicaragua0.017
Highest and lowest reading in Central America.
0.344
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Czechia0.703
Belarus0.032
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.
0.296
the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members
Ghana0.583
Burkina Faso0.048
Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.
0.259
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Sri Lanka0.621
Afghanistan0.012
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.
0.222
the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members
Tunisia0.330
Sudan0.023
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.
0.222
the middle country, of 10 measured · 11 members
Timor-Leste0.540
Myanmar0.035
Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.
0.195
the middle country, of 19 measured · 19 members
Seychelles0.703
Eritrea0.025
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.
0.166
the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members
Cyprus0.613
Azerbaijan0.034
Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.
0.163
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
São Tomé and Príncipe0.416
Equatorial Guinea0.045
Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.
0.146
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Kazakhstan0.185
Turkmenistan0.028
Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
Australia0.771
New Zealand0.644
Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.
Vanuatu0.467
Papua New Guinea0.248
Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada0.677
United States0.481
Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.
03The whole field at once
176 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 0.339; a quarter are above 0.604, and a quarter below 0.169. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 176 ever measured
In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. The index scores the process of decision-making, not whether the decisions turn out well: a government can consult widely and still choose badly, or govern effectively without consulting anyone.
Showing 25 of 176 countries
Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
051990–2025 · 36 reference years
Each point is one year from 1990, all of them re-estimated together in V-Dem's v16 release. Because elections are built into the index it moves with the Electoral Democracy Index; a fall here that the electoral index does not share means the quality of debate is changing on its own.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 176 | 0.339 | 0.169 – 0.604 | 0.330 |
| 2024 | 176 | 0.344 | 0.167 – 0.595 | 0.343 |
| 2023 | 176 | 0.353 | 0.174 – 0.610 | 0.352 |
| 2022 | 176 | 0.343 | 0.174 – 0.621 | 0.341 |
| 2021 | 176 | 0.354 | 0.172 – 0.607 | 0.351 |
| 2020 | 176 | 0.367 | 0.194 – 0.601 | 0.359 |
| 2019 | 176 | 0.376 | 0.212 – 0.599 | 0.378 |
| 2018 | 176 | 0.381 | 0.217 – 0.613 | 0.386 |
| 2017 | 176 | 0.375 | 0.209 – 0.617 | 0.374 |
| 2016 | 176 | 0.384 | 0.195 – 0.621 | 0.384 |
| 2015 | 176 | 0.378 | 0.197 – 0.631 | 0.378 |
| 2014 | 176 | 0.381 | 0.193 – 0.632 | 0.378 |
| 2013 | 176 | 0.372 | 0.193 – 0.639 | 0.374 |
| 2012 | 176 | 0.397 | 0.221 – 0.664 | 0.398 |
| 2011 | 176 | 0.397 | 0.204 – 0.659 | 0.401 |
| 2010 | 175 | 0.386 | 0.210 – 0.652 | 0.386 |
| 2009 | 175 | 0.381 | 0.198 – 0.645 | 0.381 |
| 2008 | 175 | 0.379 | 0.199 – 0.642 | 0.379 |
| 2007 | 175 | 0.364 | 0.192 – 0.640 | 0.363 |
| 2006 | 175 | 0.377 | 0.189 – 0.648 | 0.376 |
| 2005 | 175 | 0.369 | 0.192 – 0.640 | 0.364 |
| 2004 | 175 | 0.360 | 0.187 – 0.655 | 0.358 |
| 2003 | 175 | 0.349 | 0.185 – 0.644 | 0.348 |
| 2002 | 175 | 0.347 | 0.193 – 0.639 | 0.342 |
| 2001 | 175 | 0.328 | 0.188 – 0.634 | 0.328 |
| 2000 | 175 | 0.325 | 0.184 – 0.630 | 0.326 |
| 1999 | 175 | 0.322 | 0.162 – 0.617 | 0.326 |
| 1998 | 174 | 0.314 | 0.164 – 0.614 | 0.325 |
| 1997 | 173 | 0.311 | 0.158 – 0.634 | 0.318 |
| 1996 | 173 | 0.310 | 0.159 – 0.613 | 0.319 |
| 1995 | 173 | 0.313 | 0.149 – 0.607 | 0.318 |
| 1994 | 173 | 0.303 | 0.139 – 0.611 | 0.309 |
| 1993 | 173 | 0.299 | 0.140 – 0.594 | 0.308 |
| 1992 | 172 | 0.276 | 0.123 – 0.582 | 0.278 |
| 1991 | 171 | 0.244 | 0.108 – 0.557 | 0.254 |
| 1990 | 167 | 0.225 | 0.094 – 0.550 | 0.225 |
062024 → 2025
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
176 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
0.887
Deliberative democracy index (0–1)
Lowest reading on record
Reached 6 times by 2 countries — shared, so no holder is named
0.007
Deliberative democracy index (0–1)
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000
Biggest improvement between editions
+0.450
0.169 → 0.619
Biggest decline between editions
−0.353
0.377 → 0.024
Most improved since first measured
+0.589
0.114 → 0.703
At the top most often
19 of 36
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
V-Dem's Deliberative Democracy Index asks how political decisions are reached: whether leaders justify their positions with public reasons about the common good, respect opposing arguments, and consult a wide range of people before acting — on top of genuine elections. It runs from 0 to 1, and a higher figure is more democratic.
What the number is: Deliberative democracy index (0–1).
What it does not measure
It judges how decisions are made, not whether the decisions themselves are good.
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Democracy & Civil Liberties, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Where deliberative democracy is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where deliberative democracy is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 187 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
Denmark, at 0.867, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.
North Korea, at 0.011, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.
176 in 2025. The number measured varies from 167 to 176 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 176 compared in 2025, the figure was 0.339.
No. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds 36 reference years, 1990–2025, all recalculated in V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s 2026 report on one method — not 36 separate publications.
From V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, under CC BY-SA 4.0. From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.
12Method
Deliberative Democracy Index — V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country.
Newest edition
Report year 2025Data year 2025
Cite the source as: Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v16. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, University of Gothenburg.
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, checked 2026-09-26.
The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Deliberative democracy by country: Deliberative Democracy Index, data from V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/deliberative-democracy