Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Egalitarian Democracy Index
Are rights, political power and the means to use them shared equally across social groups?
Denmark placed first of the 176 countries compared in 2025, at 0.876, and Afghanistan last, at 0.016. In the middle country the figure was 0.321. Among the 167 countries measured in every edition since 1990, the middle one moved from 0.230 to 0.317.
Part ofDemocracy & Civil Liberties
Egalitarian democracy · 2025
Context statistic
Highest of 176Denmark
0.876012025 · position · derived
The three countries at the highest end of 176 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
2Photo: Ximonic , Simo Räsänen · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
3Photo: Gf uip · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
Positions out of 176. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.
Seychelles0.632
Costa Rica0.762
Japan0.758
Denmark0.876
2 countries share 0.726
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a higher value — the better end.
0.662
the middle country, of 40 measured · 49 members
Denmark0.876
Russia0.130
Highest and lowest reading in Europe.
0.502
the middle country, of 6 measured · 21 members
2 share 0.726
Papua New Guinea0.248
Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.
0.405
the middle country, of 27 measured · 48 members
Costa Rica0.762
Haiti0.076
Highest and lowest reading in Americas.
0.199
the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members
Japan0.758
Afghanistan0.016
Highest and lowest reading in Asia.
0.193
the middle country, of 55 measured · 55 members
Seychelles0.632
South Sudan0.032
Highest and lowest reading in Africa.
0.766
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
Belgium0.821
France0.721
Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.
0.753
the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members
Denmark0.876
United Kingdom0.612
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.
0.543
the middle country, of 13 measured · 17 members
Spain0.695
Serbia0.276
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.
0.532
the middle country, of 6 measured · 24 members
Barbados0.676
Haiti0.076
Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.
0.480
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
South Africa0.518
Eswatini0.077
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.
0.432
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Czechia0.767
Russia0.130
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.
0.400
the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members
Uruguay0.693
Venezuela0.080
Highest and lowest reading in South America.
0.382
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
Japan0.758
China0.078
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.
0.279
the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members
Cabo Verde0.557
Mauritania0.142
Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.
0.265
the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members
Costa Rica0.762
Nicaragua0.085
Highest and lowest reading in Central America.
0.208
the middle country, of 10 measured · 11 members
Timor-Leste0.473
Myanmar0.057
Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.
0.201
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Sri Lanka0.587
Afghanistan0.016
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.
0.188
the middle country, of 19 measured · 19 members
Seychelles0.632
South Sudan0.032
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.
0.174
the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members
Cyprus0.684
Yemen0.033
Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.
0.163
the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members
Tunisia0.323
Sudan0.078
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.
0.153
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Kyrgyzstan0.235
Tajikistan0.060
Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.
0.129
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
São Tomé and Príncipe0.448
Chad0.084
Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
2 share 0.726
2 share 0.726
Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.
Vanuatu0.565
Papua New Guinea0.248
Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada0.626
United States0.472
Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.
03The whole field at once
176 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 0.321; a quarter are above 0.559, and a quarter below 0.163. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 176 ever measured
In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. ⚠ Despite the name, this is not a measure of income inequality. It is about equal political standing — equal protection, equal access to power and the social conditions for taking part — and a country with a wide income gap can still read high here. The gap between rich and poor is measured by the Gini index.
Showing 25 of 176 countries
Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
051990–2025 · 36 reference years
Each point is one year from 1990, all of them re-estimated together in V-Dem's v16 release. Because elections are built into the index it moves with the Electoral Democracy Index; a gap opening between the two reflects change in how equally groups are treated.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 176 | 0.321 | 0.163 – 0.559 | 0.317 |
| 2024 | 176 | 0.330 | 0.169 – 0.568 | 0.326 |
| 2023 | 176 | 0.343 | 0.174 – 0.563 | 0.320 |
| 2022 | 176 | 0.340 | 0.179 – 0.575 | 0.328 |
| 2021 | 176 | 0.339 | 0.181 – 0.591 | 0.330 |
| 2020 | 176 | 0.341 | 0.191 – 0.597 | 0.329 |
| 2019 | 176 | 0.350 | 0.187 – 0.586 | 0.347 |
| 2018 | 176 | 0.347 | 0.188 – 0.591 | 0.344 |
| 2017 | 176 | 0.342 | 0.184 – 0.580 | 0.333 |
| 2016 | 176 | 0.331 | 0.188 – 0.594 | 0.329 |
| 2015 | 176 | 0.331 | 0.197 – 0.601 | 0.329 |
| 2014 | 176 | 0.336 | 0.191 – 0.597 | 0.334 |
| 2013 | 176 | 0.324 | 0.188 – 0.602 | 0.324 |
| 2012 | 176 | 0.334 | 0.191 – 0.616 | 0.328 |
| 2011 | 176 | 0.344 | 0.194 – 0.613 | 0.336 |
| 2010 | 175 | 0.340 | 0.197 – 0.615 | 0.330 |
| 2009 | 175 | 0.342 | 0.190 – 0.609 | 0.331 |
| 2008 | 175 | 0.335 | 0.194 – 0.613 | 0.333 |
| 2007 | 175 | 0.327 | 0.195 – 0.620 | 0.323 |
| 2006 | 175 | 0.329 | 0.196 – 0.616 | 0.315 |
| 2005 | 175 | 0.326 | 0.196 – 0.616 | 0.317 |
| 2004 | 175 | 0.334 | 0.186 – 0.609 | 0.323 |
| 2003 | 175 | 0.327 | 0.179 – 0.608 | 0.322 |
| 2002 | 175 | 0.323 | 0.189 – 0.609 | 0.321 |
| 2001 | 175 | 0.315 | 0.184 – 0.589 | 0.303 |
| 2000 | 175 | 0.300 | 0.182 – 0.593 | 0.300 |
| 1999 | 175 | 0.307 | 0.176 – 0.571 | 0.307 |
| 1998 | 174 | 0.310 | 0.170 – 0.567 | 0.309 |
| 1997 | 173 | 0.307 | 0.163 – 0.568 | 0.302 |
| 1996 | 173 | 0.299 | 0.162 – 0.564 | 0.299 |
| 1995 | 173 | 0.301 | 0.153 – 0.560 | 0.314 |
| 1994 | 173 | 0.289 | 0.155 – 0.549 | 0.299 |
| 1993 | 173 | 0.289 | 0.155 – 0.549 | 0.292 |
| 1992 | 172 | 0.270 | 0.150 – 0.530 | 0.272 |
| 1991 | 171 | 0.245 | 0.137 – 0.519 | 0.249 |
| 1990 | 167 | 0.230 | 0.133 – 0.511 | 0.230 |
062024 → 2025
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
176 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
0.885
Egalitarian democracy index (0–1)
Lowest reading on record
0.016
Egalitarian democracy index (0–1)
Biggest improvement between editions
+0.332
0.437 → 0.769
Biggest decline between editions
−0.177
0.240 → 0.063
Most improved since first measured
+0.471
0.047 → 0.518
At the top most often
27 of 36
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
V-Dem's Egalitarian Democracy Index asks whether rights and freedoms are protected equally for every social group, whether groups have equal access to political power, and whether the means of using them — such as education and health care — are shared equally, on top of genuine elections. It runs from 0 to 1, and a higher figure is more democratic.
What the number is: Egalitarian democracy index (0–1).
What it does not measure
It is not a measure of income inequality; the gap between rich and poor incomes is measured by the Gini index.
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Democracy & Civil Liberties, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Where egalitarian democracy is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where egalitarian democracy is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 187 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
Denmark, at 0.876, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.
Afghanistan, at 0.016, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.
176 in 2025. The number measured varies from 167 to 176 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 176 compared in 2025, the figure was 0.321.
No. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds 36 reference years, 1990–2025, all recalculated in V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s 2026 report on one method — not 36 separate publications.
From V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, under CC BY-SA 4.0. From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.
12Method
Egalitarian Democracy Index — V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country.
Newest edition
Report year 2025Data year 2025
Cite the source as: Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v16. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, University of Gothenburg.
Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, checked 2026-09-26.
The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Egalitarian democracy by country: Egalitarian Democracy Index, data from V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/egalitarian-democracy