Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

ACAPS · INFORM Severity Index

INFORM Severity Index by country

How severe is a humanitarian crisis already under way?

Of the 81 countries compared in 2025, Trinidad and Tobago had the lowest reading, 1.3, and Sudan had the highest reading, 4.7. In the middle country the figure was 3.1. Among the 55 countries measured in every edition since 2020, the middle one moved from 3.4 to 3.6.

Share

Part ofHealth & WellbeingRisk & Resilience

INFORM Severity Index · 2025

Context statistic

Lowest of 81Trinidad and Tobago

1.3

012025 · position · derived

Who leads

The three countries at the lowest end of 81 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

  1. 1

    Photo: Wikifurn · CC0, greyscale

  2. 2

    Spain

    Southern Europe

    1.5

    Photo: Poco a poco derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  3. 3

    Belarus

    Eastern Europe

    1.7

    Photo: zedlik , cropped by Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

Highest in 2025

  1. Sudan4.7
  2. Myanmar4.6
  3. Yemen4.5

Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Lowest on each continent

02Every measured country

INFORM Severity Index on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a lower value — the better end.

  • 4.0–4.7
  • 3.3–3.9
  • 2.6–3.2
  • 2.1–2.5
  • 1.3–2.0
  • No reading in 2025 (21 measured in an earlier edition)
  • Europe

    2.0

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 49 members

    Spain1.5

    Ukraine4.3

    Lowest and highest reading in Europe.

  • Americas

    2.9

    the middle country, of 16 measured · 48 members

    Trinidad and Tobago1.3

    Haiti4.5

    Lowest and highest reading in Americas.

  • Africa

    3.2

    the middle country, of 39 measured · 55 members

    2 share 1.7

    Sudan4.7

    Lowest and highest reading in Africa.

  • Asia

    3.6

    the middle country, of 19 measured · 52 members

    Malaysia1.7

    Myanmar4.6

    Lowest and highest reading in Asia.

  • Oceania

    1 of 21 measured — too few for a middle: Papua New Guinea.

    Papua New Guinea1.7

    Lowest and highest reading in Oceania.

15 sub-regions, lowest middle country first
  • Northern Africa

    2.4

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members

    2 share 1.7

    Sudan4.7

    Lowest and highest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Caribbean

    2.5

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 24 members

    Trinidad and Tobago1.3

    Haiti4.5

    Lowest and highest reading in Caribbean.

  • South-eastern Asia

    2.6

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 11 members

    Malaysia1.7

    Myanmar4.6

    Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Central America

    2.8

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 8 members

    Panama1.7

    Honduras3.4

    Lowest and highest reading in Central America.

  • Western Africa

    3.0

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 16 members

    Côte d’Ivoire2.1

    Mali4.3

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Africa.

  • Eastern Africa

    3.2

    the middle country, of 15 measured · 19 members

    Rwanda2.4

    South Sudan4.5

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • South America

    3.5

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 12 members

    Chile2.3

    Colombia4.0

    Lowest and highest reading in South America.

  • Southern Asia

    3.7

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members

    India2.6

    Afghanistan4.5

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Western Asia

    3.8

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 19 members

    Jordan3.0

    2 share 4.5

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.

  • Middle Africa

    4.0

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 9 members

    Angola3.3

    DR Congo4.4

    Lowest and highest reading in Middle Africa.

  • Eastern Asia

    1 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: North Korea.

    North Korea3.8

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Eastern Europe

    3 of 10 measured — too few for a middle: Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine.

    Belarus1.7

    Ukraine4.3

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Melanesia

    1 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Papua New Guinea.

    Papua New Guinea1.7

    Lowest and highest reading in Melanesia.

  • Southern Africa

    3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Eswatini, Lesotho, Namibia.

    Lesotho2.2

    Namibia2.6

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Africa.

  • Southern Europe

    3 of 17 measured — too few for a middle: Greece, Italy, Spain.

    Spain1.5

    Greece2.2

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Europe.

03The whole field at once

The spread

81 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 3.1; a quarter are above 3.9, and a quarter below 2.4. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

1.522.533.544.5Africa39 comparedSudan: 4.7South Sudan: 4.5DR Congo: 4.4Ethiopia: 4.3Mali: 4.3Somalia: 4.3Burkina Faso: 4.1Nigeria: 4.1Cameroon: 4.0Central African Republic: 4.0Chad: 4.0Mozambique: 3.6Niger: 3.6Zimbabwe: 3.6Libya: 3.5Burundi: 3.4Kenya: 3.4Angola: 3.3Malawi: 3.2Uganda: 3.2Zambia: 3.1Eritrea: 3.0Senegal: 3.0Mauritania: 2.9Madagascar: 2.7Djibouti: 2.6Namibia: 2.6Algeria: 2.6Ghana: 2.6Tanzania: 2.5Eswatini: 2.4Rwanda: 2.4Togo: 2.3Egypt: 2.2Lesotho: 2.2Benin: 2.2Côte d’Ivoire: 2.1Morocco: 1.7Tunisia: 1.7Morocco 1.7Sudan 4.7Americas16 comparedHaiti: 4.5Colombia: 4.0Venezuela: 3.8Ecuador: 3.5Honduras: 3.4Guatemala: 3.3Cuba: 3.0El Salvador: 2.9Peru: 2.9Mexico: 2.8Jamaica: 2.5Chile: 2.3Costa Rica: 2.0Dominican Republic: 1.9Panama: 1.7Trinidad and Tobago: 1.3Trinidad and Tobago 1.3Haiti 4.5Asia19 comparedMyanmar: 4.6Afghanistan: 4.5Syria: 4.5Yemen: 4.5Palestine: 4.2Pakistan: 4.0Iran: 3.9Lebanon: 3.8North Korea: 3.8Türkiye: 3.6Bangladesh: 3.4Iraq: 3.4Sri Lanka: 3.2Jordan: 3.0Philippines: 2.8Indonesia: 2.6India: 2.6Thailand: 2.5Malaysia: 1.7Malaysia 1.7Myanmar 4.6Europe6 comparedUkraine: 4.3Greece: 2.2Moldova: 2.1Italy: 1.8Belarus: 1.7Spain: 1.5Spain 1.5Ukraine 4.3Oceania1 comparedPapua New Guinea: 1.7middle country 3.1

04All 102 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first — position 1 is the highest value, the way ACAPS’s own tables read. “=” marks a position shared with another country. ACAPS ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. This is not a world ranking. Only countries in humanitarian crisis are scored — never the roughly 190 the rest of this site covers — so a country missing from an edition usually has no crisis to score, which is the opposite of a bad result.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 102 countries

  1. 1 of 81SudanNorthern Africa4.7
  2. 2 of 81MyanmarSouth-eastern Asia4.6
  3. =3 of 81AfghanistanSouthern Asia4.5
  4. =3 of 81HaitiCaribbean4.5
  5. =3 of 81South SudanEastern Africa4.5
  6. =3 of 81SyriaWestern Asia4.5
  7. =3 of 81YemenWestern Asia4.5
  8. 8 of 81DR CongoMiddle Africa4.4
  9. =9 of 81EthiopiaEastern Africa4.3
  10. =9 of 81MaliWestern Africa4.3
  11. =9 of 81SomaliaEastern Africa4.3
  12. =9 of 81UkraineEastern Europe4.3
  13. 13 of 81PalestineWestern Asia4.2
  14. =14 of 81Burkina FasoWestern Africa4.1
  15. =14 of 81NigeriaWestern Africa4.1
  16. =16 of 81CameroonMiddle Africa4.0
  17. =16 of 81Central African RepublicMiddle Africa4.0
  18. =16 of 81ChadMiddle Africa4.0
  19. =16 of 81ColombiaSouth America4.0
  20. =16 of 81PakistanSouthern Asia4.0
  21. 21 of 81IranSouthern Asia3.9
  22. =22 of 81LebanonWestern Asia3.8
  23. =22 of 81North KoreaEastern Asia3.8
  24. =22 of 81VenezuelaSouth America3.8
  25. =25 of 81MozambiqueEastern Africa3.6

Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

052020–2025 · 6 editions

Over time

Each point is one year-end snapshot, 2020 to 2025, and each names the month it came from.

22.533.54202061 ctys202164 ctys202284 ctys202391 ctys202491 ctys202581 ctysAsiaAfricaAmericasEurope2020: middle country 3.3 of 612021: middle country 3.5 of 642022: middle country 3.0 of 842023: middle country 2.9 of 912024: middle country 2.8 of 912025: middle country 3.1 of 81
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 55 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
2025813.12.4 – 3.93.6
2024912.82.2 – 3.93.7
2023912.92.2 – 3.83.6
2022843.02.4 – 3.83.5
2021643.52.5 – 4.13.6
2020613.32.7 – 3.93.4

062024 → 2025

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Bangladesh4.1 → 3.4 · 13th → 31st−0.7
  2. Somalia4.7 → 4.3 · 3rd → 9th−0.4
  3. Papua New Guinea2.1 → 1.7 · 69th → 74th−0.4
  4. Tunisia2.1 → 1.7 · 69th → 74th−0.4
  5. Spain1.9 → 1.5 · 74th → 80th−0.4

Worsened most

before → after
  1. Sri Lanka1.3 → 3.2 · 88th → 38th+1.9
  2. Ecuador2.7 → 3.5 · 47th → 29th+0.8
  3. Senegal2.3 → 3.0 · 59th → 42nd+0.7
  4. Angola2.7 → 3.3 · 47th → 36th+0.6
  5. Haiti4.0 → 4.5 · 18th → 3rd+0.5

75 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025. The field changed from 91 to 81 countries, so a place can move for reasons that have nothing to do with the country itself.

07Across every edition

INFORM Severity Index in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08The measure

About INFORM Severity Index

The INFORM Severity Index scores how bad a humanitarian crisis actually is, from 1 to 5, built from the conditions of the people affected, the complexity of the crisis and how hard it is to operate there. ACAPS publishes it monthly for the countries in crisis.

What the number is: INFORM Severity (1–5, most severe crisis).

09Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Health & Wellbeing and Risk & Resilience, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

Health & WellbeingRisk & ResilienceWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where INFORM Severity Index is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where INFORM Severity Index is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 120 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

11Keep reading

Explore further

12Questions

INFORM Severity Index: questions and answers

Which country has the lowest INFORM Severity Index?

Trinidad and Tobago, at 1.3, among the 81 countries compared in 2025.

Which country has the highest INFORM Severity Index?

Sudan, at 4.7, among the 81 countries compared in 2025.

How many countries does the INFORM Severity Index cover?

81 in 2025, and 102 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 61 to 91 between editions.

What is the world average INFORM Severity Index?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 81 compared in 2025, the figure was 3.1.

Is this ACAPS’s own ranking?

No. ACAPS publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.

How often is the INFORM Severity Index published?

This site holds 6 editions, describing 2020 to 2025.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From ACAPS, under CC BY 4.0. From the ACAPS INFORM Severity dataset, taking the last release of each year. Where a country has more than one crisis the most severe is shown, because ACAPS publishes no combined country figure. The series stops at 2025: ACAPS moved to a 1–10 scale in January 2026, and importing both would show every country’s severity doubling overnight. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

13Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

INFORM Severity Index — ACAPS

From the ACAPS INFORM Severity dataset, taking the last release of each year. Where a country has more than one crisis the most severe is shown, because ACAPS publishes no combined country figure. The series stops at 2025: ACAPS moved to a 1–10 scale in January 2026, and importing both would show every country’s severity doubling overnight.

Newest edition

Report year 2025Data year 2025

Cite the source as: ACAPS. INFORM Severity Index. Geneva: ACAPS.

Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-05.

The full 2025 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • ACAPS ranks nobody on this measure. The position is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values; equal values share a position.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Photographs

The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). INFORM Severity Index by country: INFORM Severity Index, data from ACAPS. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/inform-severity

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.