Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
FAO · Forest Area
How much of a country's land is forest?
Of the 213 countries compared in 2023, Suriname had the highest reading, 94.448%, and 4 countries shared the lowest reading, 0.000%. In the middle country the figure was 31.080%. Among the 177 countries measured in every edition since 1990, the middle one moved from 29.181% to 30.270%.
Part ofEnvironment & Sustainability
Forest area · 2023
Context statistic
Highest of 213Suriname
94.448%012023 · position · derived
The three countries with the highest values of 213 compared, the three with the lowest, and the highest on each continent. This statistic has no better end, so no country is shown as leading.
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a higher value. This statistic has no better end, so the shades describe size, not success.
51.852%
the middle country, of 19 measured · 21 members
Micronesia92.157%
Nauru0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.
40.885%
the middle country, of 46 measured · 48 members
Suriname94.448%
Greenland0.001%
Highest and lowest reading in Americas.
32.787%
the middle country, of 46 measured · 49 members
Finland73.724%
2 share 0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Europe.
21.683%
the middle country, of 54 measured · 55 members
Gabon91.182%
Egypt0.045%
Highest and lowest reading in Africa.
14.149%
the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members
Brunei72.106%
Qatar0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Asia.
63.495%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Solomon Islands90.060%
Vanuatu36.284%
Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.
52.222%
the middle country, of 7 measured · 7 members
Micronesia92.157%
Nauru0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Micronesia.
52.125%
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Gabon91.182%
Chad3.161%
Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.
50.889%
the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members
Suriname94.448%
Argentina10.321%
Highest and lowest reading in South America.
49.551%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 8 members
Japan68.396%
Mongolia9.092%
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.
47.445%
the middle country, of 11 measured · 11 members
Brunei72.106%
Singapore20.933%
Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.
44.057%
the middle country, of 8 measured · 8 members
Costa Rica60.399%
Nicaragua25.823%
Highest and lowest reading in Central America.
43.060%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 7 members
American Samoa85.200%
Tonga12.431%
Highest and lowest reading in Polynesia.
38.178%
the middle country, of 22 measured · 24 members
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines73.179%
Curaçao0.158%
Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.
34.043%
the middle country, of 15 measured · 17 members
Montenegro61.487%
Gibraltar0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.
32.921%
the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members
Russia49.784%
Moldova11.737%
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.
32.476%
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Austria47.240%
Monaco0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.
24.641%
the middle country, of 12 measured · 13 members
Finland73.724%
Faroe Islands0.058%
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.
22.744%
the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members
Liberia78.142%
Mauritania0.288%
Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.
15.956%
the middle country, of 18 measured · 19 members
Seychelles73.261%
Djibouti0.261%
Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.
14.490%
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Bhutan71.605%
Afghanistan1.853%
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.
13.965%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Eswatini29.139%
Lesotho1.137%
Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.
7.143%
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
Turkmenistan8.782%
Kazakhstan1.312%
Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.
2.692%
the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members
Morocco12.937%
Egypt0.045%
Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.
2.372%
the middle country, of 18 measured · 19 members
Georgia40.616%
Qatar0.000%
Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
New Zealand37.789%
Australia17.421%
Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Bermuda, Canada, Greenland, United States.
Canada39.462%
Greenland0.001%
Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.
03The whole field at once
213 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 31.080%; a quarter are above 49.551%, and a quarter below 11.057%. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 214 ever measured
In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. Neither end is better. Suriname is 97% forest and Qatar is 0%, and the difference between them is climate rather than policy. A zero is a real reading — some countries genuinely have no forest. Read it alongside agricultural land, which is the other half of the same land budget.
Showing 25 of 214 countries
Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
051990–2023 · 34 reference years
Each point is one reference year from 1990. What a country does to its OWN figure over time is the part that carries meaning.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 213 | 31.080% | 11.057% – 49.551% | 30.270% |
| 2022 | 213 | 31.059% | 11.074% – 49.784% | 30.270% |
| 2021 | 214 | 30.645% | 11.020% – 49.874% | 30.270% |
| 2020 | 214 | 30.624% | 10.999% – 50.005% | 30.270% |
| 2019 | 214 | 30.605% | 10.978% – 50.136% | 30.270% |
| 2018 | 214 | 30.582% | 10.957% – 50.273% | 30.270% |
| 2017 | 214 | 30.831% | 10.939% – 50.468% | 30.809% |
| 2016 | 214 | 30.958% | 10.929% – 50.774% | 30.814% |
| 2015 | 214 | 30.676% | 10.909% – 50.490% | 30.586% |
| 2014 | 214 | 30.585% | 10.886% – 51.064% | 30.464% |
| 2013 | 214 | 30.776% | 10.868% – 51.219% | 30.644% |
| 2012 | 214 | 30.679% | 10.878% – 51.351% | 30.584% |
| 2011 | 212 | 30.665% | 10.893% – 51.729% | 30.523% |
| 2010 | 209 | 31.020% | 11.040% – 51.843% | 30.459% |
| 2009 | 209 | 30.731% | 11.031% – 52.019% | 30.306% |
| 2008 | 209 | 30.786% | 11.000% – 52.059% | 30.281% |
| 2007 | 209 | 31.003% | 11.074% – 52.059% | 30.191% |
| 2006 | 209 | 31.220% | 11.074% – 52.222% | 30.103% |
| 2005 | 207 | 31.437% | 11.001% – 51.976% | 30.459% |
| 2004 | 207 | 31.654% | 10.985% – 51.662% | 30.659% |
| 2003 | 207 | 31.872% | 11.027% – 51.919% | 30.560% |
| 2002 | 207 | 31.796% | 11.042% – 52.141% | 30.674% |
| 2001 | 207 | 32.241% | 11.058% – 52.159% | 30.834% |
| 2000 | 207 | 32.227% | 11.074% – 52.153% | 30.507% |
| 1999 | 205 | 32.108% | 11.074% – 52.222% | 30.464% |
| 1998 | 205 | 31.988% | 11.074% – 52.222% | 30.420% |
| 1997 | 205 | 31.868% | 11.074% – 52.059% | 30.377% |
| 1996 | 205 | 31.749% | 11.074% – 52.059% | 30.334% |
| 1995 | 205 | 31.629% | 11.074% – 52.112% | 30.290% |
| 1994 | 205 | 31.509% | 11.074% – 52.222% | 30.247% |
| 1993 | 205 | 31.025% | 11.074% – 52.222% | 29.756% |
| 1992 | 201 | 30.285% | 10.897% – 52.203% | 29.397% |
| 1991 | 182 | 29.831% | 11.194% – 54.435% | 29.470% |
| 1990 | 178 | 29.153% | 10.941% – 53.314% | 29.181% |
062022 → 2023
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
213 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
96.226%
Forest area (% of land area)
Lowest reading on record
Reached 136 times by 4 countries — shared, so no holder is named
0.000%
Forest area (% of land area)
Biggest rise between editions
+9.693
54.288% → 63.981%
Biggest fall between editions
−11.152
64.109% → 52.957%
Biggest change since first measured
+20.008
36.114% → 56.122%
Highest most often
32 of 34
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
Forest area is the share of a country’s land that is forest, as measured by the FAO. It is the headline number in every deforestation debate — and the one most often quoted without its context.
What the number is: Forest area (% of land area).
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Environment & Sustainability, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Where forest area is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where forest area is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 126 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
Suriname, at 94.448%, among the 213 countries compared in 2023.
4 countries share the lowest reading, 0.000%, among the 213 compared in 2023, so no single country is named.
213 in 2023, and 214 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 178 to 214 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 213 compared in 2023, the figure was 31.080%.
No. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.
This site holds 34 reference years, 1990–2023, all recalculated in Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)’s 2026 report on one method — not 34 separate publications.
From Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), under CC BY 4.0. From FAOSTAT, fetched through the World Bank’s indicator API (AG.LND.FRST.ZS). Every edition is available on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, unrounded.
12Method
Forest Area — Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
From FAOSTAT, fetched through the World Bank’s indicator API (AG.LND.FRST.ZS).
Newest edition
Report year 2023Data year 2023
Cite the source as: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Rome: FAO.
Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-06.
34 reference years (1990–2023), covering 178 to 214 countries — one of the most complete panels on the site — from FAOSTAT, fetched through the World Bank’s indicator API (AG.LND.FRST.ZS). ⚠ NEITHER END IS BETTER, so this indicator carries no good/bad colouring anywhere on the site and does not feed its topics’ rankings — it is charted on them, not scored by them. Suriname is 97% forest and Qatar is 0%, and the difference between them is climate rather than policy. What a country does to its OWN figure over time is the part that carries meaning, which is what the trend line on each country’s card shows. ⚠ A zero here is a real reading — some countries genuinely have no forest. ⚠ These are not separate published reports — `restatedByReport` names the World Development Indicators release they were pulled from. ⚠ A statistic, not an index. ⚠ No rank is published. A POSITION is derived here (2026-09-10) by ordering the score LARGEST FIRST, and it is a SIZE ORDER rather than a league table: this measure has no better end, so position 1 names the country with the biggest figure and says nothing about how that country is doing. The change arrows stay grey for the same reason, and the indicator is still left out of the Country Index.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Forest area by country: Forest Area, data from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/forest-area