Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

ILO · Fatal Occupational Injuries

Fatal occupational injuries by country

How many workers die from injuries at work?

Of the 52 countries compared in 2023, Belgium had the lowest reading, 0.120, and Türkiye had the highest reading, 8.409. In the middle country the figure was 2.005. Among the 25 countries measured in every edition since 2000, the middle one moved from 5.200 to 2.010.

Share

Part ofWork & LabourHealth & Wellbeing

Fatal occupational injuries · 2023

Context statistic

Lowest of 52Belgium

0.120

012023 · values only

Who leads

The three countries at the lowest end of 52 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

  1. 1

    Belgium

    Western Europe

    0.120

    Photo: Gf uip · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  2. 2

    Panama

    Central America

    0.130

    Photo: Brian Gratwicke derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY 2.0, greyscale

  3. 3

    Netherlands

    Western Europe

    0.380

    Photo: Traveler100 · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

Highest in 2023

  1. Türkiye8.409
  2. Colombia6.460
  3. Turkmenistan6.040

Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Lowest on each continent

02Every measured country

Fatal occupational injuries on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a lower value — the better end.

  • 3.930–8.409
  • 2.550–3.530
  • 1.480–2.254
  • 1.030–1.470
  • 0.120–1.028
  • No reading in 2023 (46 measured in an earlier edition)
  • Europe

    1.640

    the middle country, of 31 measured · 49 members

    Belgium0.120

    Russia5.300

    Lowest and highest reading in Europe.

  • Americas

    3.380

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 48 members

    Panama0.130

    Colombia6.460

    Lowest and highest reading in Americas.

  • Asia

    3.930

    the middle country, of 13 measured · 52 members

    Sri Lanka0.610

    Türkiye8.409

    Lowest and highest reading in Asia.

  • Africa

    1 of 55 measured — too few for a middle: Mauritius.

    Mauritius2.600

    Lowest and highest reading in Africa.

  • Oceania

    1 of 21 measured — too few for a middle: Australia.

    Australia1.416

    Lowest and highest reading in Oceania.

14 sub-regions, lowest middle country first
  • Western Europe

    0.920

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 9 members

    Belgium0.120

    Austria2.010

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Europe.

  • Northern Europe

    1.380

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 13 members

    Sweden1.024

    Latvia3.530

    Lowest and highest reading in Northern Europe.

  • Southern Europe

    2.010

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 17 members

    Greece1.480

    Portugal2.690

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Europe.

  • Eastern Europe

    2.254

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 10 members

    Slovakia0.860

    Russia5.300

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Western Asia

    3.240

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 19 members

    Israel1.624

    Türkiye8.409

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    1 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia.

    Australia1.416

    Lowest and highest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Central America

    1 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: Panama.

    Panama0.130

    Lowest and highest reading in Central America.

  • Central Asia

    2 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan.

    Uzbekistan4.000

    Turkmenistan6.040

    Lowest and highest reading in Central Asia.

  • Eastern Africa

    1 of 19 measured — too few for a middle: Mauritius.

    Mauritius2.600

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Eastern Asia

    3 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: Japan, Mongolia, South Korea.

    Japan1.320

    Mongolia4.400

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Northern America

    2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.

    United States3.500

    Canada5.198

    Lowest and highest reading in Northern America.

  • South America

    3 of 12 measured — too few for a middle: Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador.

    Ecuador1.000

    Colombia6.460

    Lowest and highest reading in South America.

  • South-eastern Asia

    2 of 11 measured — too few for a middle: Singapore, Thailand.

    Singapore0.990

    Thailand5.110

    Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Southern Asia

    1 of 9 measured — too few for a middle: Sri Lanka.

    Sri Lanka0.610

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.

03The whole field at once

The spread

52 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 2.005; a quarter are above 3.502, and a quarter below 1.265. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

2468Africa1 comparedMauritius: 2.600Americas6 comparedPanama: 0.130Ecuador: 1.000Argentina: 3.260United States: 3.500Canada: 5.198Colombia: 6.460Panama 0.130Colombia 6.460Asia13 comparedSri Lanka: 0.610Singapore: 0.990Japan: 1.320Israel: 1.624Georgia: 2.550Cyprus: 3.240South Korea: 3.930Azerbaijan: 4.000Uzbekistan: 4.000Mongolia: 4.400Thailand: 5.110Turkmenistan: 6.040Türkiye: 8.409Sri Lanka 0.610Türkiye 8.409Europe31 comparedBelgium: 0.120Netherlands: 0.380Germany: 0.710Slovakia: 0.860Sweden: 1.024Finland: 1.028Denmark: 1.030Switzerland: 1.130Poland: 1.190Norway: 1.290Hungary: 1.310Iceland: 1.380Estonia: 1.400Ireland: 1.470Greece: 1.480Czechia: 1.640Spain: 1.712Luxembourg: 1.820Malta: 2.000Austria: 2.010Italy: 2.010Slovenia: 2.200Romania: 2.254Croatia: 2.580Belarus: 2.684Portugal: 2.690Lithuania: 2.900Bulgaria: 3.507Latvia: 3.530Moldova: 4.000Russia: 5.300Belgium 0.120Russia 5.300Oceania1 comparedAustralia: 1.416middle country 2.005

04All 98 ever measured

Every country

In order, lowest value first. No rank or position is shown: too many countries share the same value for an order to mean anything. Read this as a measure of reporting as much as of safety. A country that investigates every workplace death will record more than one that investigates none, and the most dangerous places to work are largely missing from the table altogether. No position is shown, because numbering these rows would read as a safety ranking and it is not one.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 98 countries

  1. BelgiumWestern Europe0.120
  2. PanamaCentral America0.130
  3. NetherlandsWestern Europe0.380
  4. Sri LankaSouthern Asia0.610
  5. GermanyWestern Europe0.710
  6. SlovakiaEastern Europe0.860
  7. SingaporeSouth-eastern Asia0.990
  8. EcuadorSouth America1.000
  9. SwedenNorthern Europe1.024
  10. FinlandNorthern Europe1.028
  11. DenmarkNorthern Europe1.030
  12. SwitzerlandWestern Europe1.130
  13. PolandEastern Europe1.190
  14. NorwayNorthern Europe1.290
  15. HungaryEastern Europe1.310
  16. JapanEastern Asia1.320
  17. IcelandNorthern Europe1.380
  18. EstoniaNorthern Europe1.400
  19. AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand1.416
  20. IrelandNorthern Europe1.470
  21. GreeceSouthern Europe1.480
  22. IsraelWestern Asia1.624
  23. CzechiaEastern Europe1.640
  24. SpainSouthern Europe1.712
  25. LuxembourgWestern Europe1.820

Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

052000–2023 · 23 editions

Over time

Each point is one reference year from 2000. A rise can mean deteriorating safety or improving record-keeping, and the series cannot tell you which.

246810200020032006201020132016201920222023AfricaAsiaAmericasEurope
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 25 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
2023522.0051.265 – 3.5022.010
2022582.1171.300 – 3.6222.034
2021572.1501.410 – 4.2702.000
2020602.4351.370 – 3.7132.300
2019602.5161.388 – 4.4102.100
2018602.4001.510 – 3.7782.120
2017582.0101.210 – 3.7022.010
2016562.2491.746 – 4.2902.110
2015612.7901.730 – 5.0002.670
2014552.5601.770 – 4.8712.460
2013573.0202.010 – 5.8302.630
2012573.8102.060 – 5.7502.750
2011583.4102.098 – 5.7403.120
2010523.3652.227 – 6.7753.090
2009543.3652.152 – 6.6753.080
2007515.0003.300 – 7.7544.300
2006535.0003.000 – 8.0004.600
2005574.6003.000 – 7.5004.500
2004595.0002.950 – 8.5505.000
2003645.2453.398 – 9.5505.100
2002676.0603.850 – 10.0755.000
2001685.8503.375 – 9.2455.200
2000716.4003.940 – 9.5505.200

062022 → 2023

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Malta5.280 → 2.000−3.280
  2. Panama1.004 → 0.130−0.874
  3. Estonia2.200 → 1.400−0.800
  4. Moldova4.800 → 4.000−0.800
  5. Belarus3.387 → 2.684−0.703

Worsened most

before → after
  1. Türkiye6.340 → 8.409+2.069
  2. Azerbaijan2.000 → 4.000+2.000
  3. Colombia4.659 → 6.460+1.801
  4. Mauritius1.300 → 2.600+1.300
  5. Cyprus2.230 → 3.240+1.010

50 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023. The field changed from 58 to 52 countries, so a place can move for reasons that have nothing to do with the country itself.

07Across every edition

Fatal occupational injuries in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08By sex

Inside the number

International Labour Organization (ILO) also publishes separate female and male readings. The gap between them, where both exist.

Of the 24 countries with both readings, the women reading is higher in 0, the men reading in 24. The widest gaps each way:

WomenMenTürkiyeTürkiye, women: 0.808Türkiye, men: 11.846Men +11.038RussiaRussia, women: 0.700Russia, men: 8.700Men +8.000MoldovaMoldova, women: 0.600Moldova, men: 7.800Men +7.200BulgariaBulgaria, women: 0.155Bulgaria, men: 6.906Men +6.751MongoliaMongolia, women: 1.000Mongolia, men: 7.300Men +6.300

09The measure

About fatal occupational injuries

This counts deaths caused by injuries at work, per 100,000 workers, as reported by national labour inspectorates to the ILO. It is the headline global measure of how dangerous work is.

What the number is: Fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers.

10Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Work & Labour and Health & Wellbeing, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

Work & LabourHealth & WellbeingWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where fatal occupational injuries is higher, these tend to be higher too.

No statistic lines up this closely.

Moves against

Where fatal occupational injuries is higher, these tend to be lower.

No statistic lines up this closely.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 0 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

12Questions

Fatal occupational injuries: questions and answers

Which country has the lowest fatal occupational injuries?

Belgium, at 0.120, among the 52 countries compared in 2023.

Which country has the highest fatal occupational injuries?

Türkiye, at 8.409, among the 52 countries compared in 2023.

How many countries does the Fatal Occupational Injuries cover?

52 in 2023, and 98 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 51 to 71 between editions.

What is the world average fatal occupational injuries?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 52 compared in 2023, the figure was 2.005.

Is this International Labour Organization (ILO)’s own ranking?

No ranking is shown. International Labour Organization (ILO) publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything, so none is derived.

How often is the Fatal Occupational Injuries published?

This site holds 23 editions, describing 2000 to 2023.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From International Labour Organization (ILO), under CC BY 4.0. SDG indicator 8.8.1, read from ILOSTAT directly. Only 99 countries report at all, so this series uses a 50-country floor rather than the site's usual 80. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

13Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

Fatal Occupational Injuries — International Labour Organization (ILO)

SDG indicator 8.8.1, read from ILOSTAT directly. Only 99 countries report at all, so this series uses a 50-country floor rather than the site's usual 80.

Newest edition

Report year 2023Data year 2023

Cite the source as: International Labour Organization. ILOSTAT. Geneva: ILO.

Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-10.

The full 2023 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • No rank or position is shown: International Labour Organization (ILO) publishes values only, and too many countries share the same value for an ordering to mean anything.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Photographs

The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Fatal occupational injuries by country: Fatal Occupational Injuries, data from International Labour Organization (ILO). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/fatal-injuries

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.