Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2017

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017

2017, as V-Dem Institute’s 2026 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017 covers 176 countries. Australia is highest, at 0.988; North Korea is lowest, at 0.004. The middle country reads 0.655. Against 2016, 130 values changed (59 up, 71 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index · Data for 2017

HighestAustralia

0.988

LowestNorth Korea

0.004

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017, as published. V-Dem Institute ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 176 countries · select a heading to sort

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017: every country, as published by V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg.
derived
1AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand0.988
2SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe0.987
=3DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe0.984
=3NorwayNORNorthern Europe0.984
5FinlandFINNorthern Europe0.976
=6PortugalPRTSouthern Europe0.972
=6SwedenSWENorthern Europe0.972
8LithuaniaLTUNorthern Europe0.971
9New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand0.970
10ChileCHLSouth America0.962
11NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe0.961
12IrelandIRLNorthern Europe0.957
=13EstoniaESTNorthern Europe0.953
=13LatviaLVANorthern Europe0.953
15Costa RicaCRICentral America0.952
16UruguayURYSouth America0.947
17FranceFRAWestern Europe0.946
18IcelandISLNorthern Europe0.943
19SpainESPSouthern Europe0.941
20CanadaCANNorthern America0.932
21United StatesUSANorthern America0.931
22South KoreaKOREastern Asia0.929
23BelgiumBELWestern Europe0.928
24BarbadosBRBCaribbean0.926
25United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe0.922

02In 2017

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline.

Highest

  1. 1Australia0.988
  2. 2Switzerland0.987
  3. 3Denmarkshared0.984
  4. 3Norwayshared0.984
  5. 5Finland0.976

Lowest

  1. 176North Korea0.004
  2. 174Eritreashared0.014
  3. 174Azerbaijanshared0.014
  4. 173Uzbekistan0.019
  5. 171Venezuelashared0.025

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 0.655. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

032016 → 2017

Since 2016

What changed between 2016 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 130values changed, of 176 in both
  • 59 · 71rose · fell
  • 46unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

How values are stored
  • One year of the 2026 release

    Every year in this series comes from V-Dem Institute’s 2026 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2017.

  • 163 distinct values among 176

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 3 decimals. 2 countries share 0.984. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    V-Dem Institute publishes values only; the order is this site’s.

  • Nothing missing

    Every one of the 176 countries has every column.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · what it allows, in plain words

Cite this edition

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg (2017). Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017 [data set], describing 2017. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/judicial-constraints/2017

0636 held

Other years

07Questions

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017: questions and answers

Which country has the highest judicial constraints on the executive in Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017?

Australia, at 0.988, of the 176 countries in the file.

What year does Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017 describe?

2017.

How many countries does Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017 cover?

176.

Where can I download Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2017 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2025.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.