Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2016

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016

2016, as V-Dem Institute’s 2026 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016 covers 176 countries. Denmark is highest, at 0.988; North Korea is lowest, at 0.004. The middle country reads 0.652. Against 2015, 91 values changed (41 up, 50 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index · Data for 2016

HighestDenmark

0.988

LowestNorth Korea

0.004

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016, as published. V-Dem Institute ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 176 countries · select a heading to sort

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016: every country, as published by V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg.
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe0.988
=2AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand0.987
=2SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe0.987
4NorwayNORNorthern Europe0.984
5FinlandFINNorthern Europe0.976
6New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand0.974
7LithuaniaLTUNorthern Europe0.973
8SwedenSWENorthern Europe0.972
=9ChileCHLSouth America0.962
=9United StatesUSANorthern America0.962
=11EstoniaESTNorthern Europe0.953
=11LatviaLVANorthern Europe0.953
=11PortugalPRTSouthern Europe0.953
=14Costa RicaCRICentral America0.952
=14GermanyDEUWestern Europe0.952
=14IrelandIRLNorthern Europe0.952
17NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe0.949
18UruguayURYSouth America0.947
19FranceFRAWestern Europe0.946
20IcelandISLNorthern Europe0.943
21SpainESPSouthern Europe0.942
22BelgiumBELWestern Europe0.928
23CanadaCANNorthern America0.925
=24Cabo VerdeCPVWestern Africa0.922
=24RomaniaROUEastern Europe0.922

02In 2016

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark0.988
  2. 2Australiashared0.987
  3. 2Switzerlandshared0.987
  4. 4Norway0.984
  5. 5Finland0.976

Lowest

  1. 176North Korea0.004
  2. 175Eritrea0.008
  3. 174Azerbaijan0.013
  4. 173Uzbekistan0.021
  5. 172Venezuela0.023

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 0.652. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

032015 → 2016

Since 2015

What changed between 2015 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 91values changed, of 176 in both
  • 41 · 50rose · fell
  • 85unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

How values are stored
  • One year of the 2026 release

    Every year in this series comes from V-Dem Institute’s 2026 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2016.

  • 157 distinct values among 176

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 3 decimals. 3 countries share 0.953. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    V-Dem Institute publishes values only; the order is this site’s.

  • Nothing missing

    Every one of the 176 countries has every column.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · what it allows, in plain words

Cite this edition

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg (2016). Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016 [data set], describing 2016. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/judicial-constraints/2016

0636 held

Other years

07Questions

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016: questions and answers

Which country has the highest judicial constraints on the executive in Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016?

Denmark, at 0.988, of the 176 countries in the file.

What year does Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016 describe?

2016.

How many countries does Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016 cover?

176.

Where can I download Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2016 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2025.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.