Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2006

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006

2006, as V-Dem Institute’s 2026 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006 covers 175 countries. Australia is highest, at 0.990; North Korea is lowest, at 0.004. The middle country reads 0.659. Against 2005, 45 values changed (22 up, 23 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index · Data for 2006

HighestAustralia

0.990

LowestNorth Korea

0.004

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006, as published. V-Dem Institute ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 175 countries · select a heading to sort

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006: every country, as published by V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg.
derived
1AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand0.990
2DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe0.988
3SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe0.987
4NorwayNORNorthern Europe0.984
5New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand0.974
6SwedenSWENorthern Europe0.973
=7FinlandFINNorthern Europe0.968
=7SpainESPSouthern Europe0.968
9LithuaniaLTUNorthern Europe0.963
10PolandPOLEastern Europe0.956
11PortugalPRTSouthern Europe0.955
12EstoniaESTNorthern Europe0.953
=13GermanyDEUWestern Europe0.952
=13IrelandIRLNorthern Europe0.952
=15NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe0.949
=15United StatesUSANorthern America0.949
17Costa RicaCRICentral America0.946
18FranceFRAWestern Europe0.944
19IcelandISLNorthern Europe0.942
=20ChileCHLSouth America0.940
=20UruguayURYSouth America0.940
22CanadaCANNorthern America0.936
23BelgiumBELWestern Europe0.933
24Cabo VerdeCPVWestern Africa0.927
25BrazilBRASouth America0.925

02In 2006

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline.

Highest

  1. 1Australia0.990
  2. 2Denmark0.988
  3. 3Switzerland0.987
  4. 4Norway0.984
  5. 5New Zealand0.974

Lowest

  1. 175North Korea0.004
  2. 174Eritrea0.006
  3. 173Uzbekistan0.018
  4. 172Turkmenistan0.029
  5. 171Myanmar0.037

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 0.659. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

032005 → 2006

Since 2005

What changed between 2005 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 45values changed, of 175 in both
  • 22 · 23rose · fell
  • 130unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

How values are stored
  • One year of the 2026 release

    Every year in this series comes from V-Dem Institute’s 2026 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2006.

  • 161 distinct values among 175

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 3 decimals. 3 countries share 0.904. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    V-Dem Institute publishes values only; the order is this site’s.

  • Nothing missing

    Every one of the 175 countries has every column.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · what it allows, in plain words

Cite this edition

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg (2006). Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006 [data set], describing 2006. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/judicial-constraints/2006

0636 held

Other years

07Questions

Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006: questions and answers

Which country has the highest judicial constraints on the executive in Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006?

Australia, at 0.990, of the 175 countries in the file.

What year does Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006 describe?

2006.

How many countries does Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006 cover?

175.

Where can I download Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2006 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index, 2025.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.