Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2003

Ecological Footprint, 2003

Figures for 2003, as Global Footprint Network published them · stored as published, never rewritten

Ecological Footprint, 2003 covers 122 countries. Luxembourg is highest, at 16.8909; Timor-Leste is lowest, at 0.3748. The middle country reads 2.0449. Against 2002, 122 values changed (70 up, 52 down), the same countries are covered.

Download CSVCite this year
Share

Share this page

Ecological Footprint · Data for 2003

HighestLuxembourg

16.8909

LowestTimor-Leste

0.3748

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the lowest end.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Ecological Footprint, 2003, as published. Global Footprint Network ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 122 countries · select a heading to sort

Ecological Footprint, 2003: every country, as published by Global Footprint Network.
derived
1LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe16.8909
2QatarQATWestern Asia11.0098
3United StatesUSANorthern America9.8026
4DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe9.4633
5CanadaCANNorthern America8.7659
6BelgiumBELWestern Europe8.1108
7EstoniaESTNorthern Europe7.2155
8SwedenSWENorthern Europe6.7109
9NorwayNORNorthern Europe5.9487
10GreeceGRCSouthern Europe5.8556
11AustriaAUTWestern Europe5.8440
12United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe5.7403
13SpainESPSouthern Europe5.6808
14CzechiaCZEEastern Europe5.5908
15ItalyITASouthern Europe5.5615
16OmanOMNWestern Asia5.4934
17FranceFRAWestern Europe5.4103
18CyprusCYPWestern Asia5.3924
19South KoreaKOREastern Asia5.2947
20MaltaMLTSouthern Europe5.2146
21GermanyDEUWestern Europe5.1989
22JapanJPNEastern Asia5.0879
23SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe5.0683
24IsraelISRWestern Asia4.9798
25RussiaRUSEastern Europe4.9007

02In 2003

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline.

Highest

  1. 1Luxembourg16.8909
  2. 2Qatar11.0098
  3. 3United States9.8026
  4. 4Denmark9.4633
  5. 5Canada8.7659

Lowest

  1. 122Timor-Leste0.3748
  2. 121Bangladesh0.4790
  3. 120Malawi0.5998
  4. 119Haiti0.6039
  5. 118Nepal0.6635

A higher value is the worse result. The middle country reads 2.0449. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

032002 → 2003

Since 2002

What changed between 2002 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 122values changed, of 122 in both
  • 70 · 52rose · fell
  • 0unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Changes in value, not in places: a country’s place also moves when others do. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

How values are stored

  • The position is ours

    Global Footprint Network publishes values only; the order is this site’s.

  • Nothing missing

    Every one of the 122 countries has every column.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · what it allows, in plain words

Cite this edition

Global Footprint Network (2003). Ecological Footprint, 2003 [data set], describing 2003. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/ecological-footprint/2003

0665 held

Other years

07Questions

Ecological Footprint, 2003: questions and answers

Which country has the highest ecological footprint in Ecological Footprint, 2003?

Luxembourg, at 16.8909, of the 122 countries in the file.

What year does Ecological Footprint, 2003 describe?

2003.

How many countries does Ecological Footprint, 2003 cover?

122.

Where can I download Ecological Footprint, 2003?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Ecological Footprint, 2003 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Ecological Footprint, 2025.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.