Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home
A view of South Korea

Photo: Unknown author · CC BY-SA 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale

Democracy & Civil Liberties

joint38th

of 198 countries placed

Placed from 4 of 4 key statistics

01The evidence

The 4 key statistics that decide it

Only these place South Korea on democracy & civil liberties — one vote each. Every value is the publisher’s own, read at the edition the Country Index 2026 used — or, for a survey-based key, each country’s latest reading; the grey ticks are every other country it was compared with, lowest on the left.

Why these keys
  1. Key 1 of 4

    Rule of Law

    World Bank Group

    Why it is a key

    2025 edition · data for 2025 · CC BY 4.0

    1.195

    Rule of Law estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)

    Higher is better

    South Korea: 1.195. Across the 211 countries in this edition, values run from -2.199 (Venezuela) to 2.012 (Finland); the world median is -0.102.

    World median
    -0.102
    Best in Eastern Asia
    1.542 Japan
    Land neighbours
    North Korea -1.486
  2. Key 2 of 4

    Civic Space Ratings

    CIVICUS

    Why it is a key

    2025 edition · data for 2025 · CC BY-SA 4.0

    72.93

    Civic space score (0–100)

    Higher is better

    South Korea: 72.93. Across the 198 countries in this edition, values run from 2.17 (North Korea) to 100 (Kiribati); the world median is 50.46.

    World median
    50.46
    Best in Eastern Asia
    87.92 Taiwan
    Land neighbours
    North Korea 2.17
  3. Key 3 of 4

    V-Dem Electoral Democracy Index

    V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg

    Why it is a key

    2025 edition · data for 2025 · CC BY-SA 4.0

    0.819

    Electoral democracy index (0–1)

    Higher is better

    South Korea: 0.819. Across the 176 countries in this edition, values run from 0.016 (Saudi Arabia) to 0.913 (Denmark); the world median is 0.497.

    World median
    0.497
    Best in Eastern Asia
    0.819 Japan and South Korea
    Land neighbours
    North Korea 0.083
  4. Key 4 of 4

    Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Index

    Electoral Integrity Project (EIP)

    Why it is a key

    Latest reading per country, 2015–2025 · South Korea’s is from 2025 · CC BY 4.0

    67.86

    Electoral Integrity Index (0–100; higher = greater electoral integrity)

    Higher is better

    South Korea: 67.86. Across the 171 countries at their latest reading, values run from 12.86 (Iraq) to 88.61 (Sweden); the world median is 54.78.

    World median
    54.78
    Best in Eastern Asia
    70.03 Taiwan

03In context

South Korea beside its neighbours

A position reads best beside the countries around it. Every position below is a place among all 198 countries on democracy & civil liberties, never a place within the region.

Eastern Asia
1st198thNot placed · 26 countries with too few key statisticsNo data

The whole world on democracy & civil liberties

South Korea and the countries it borders

Standing among all 198; the key columns are the publishers’ own values.

CountryStandingRule of LawRule of Law estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)Civic Space RatingsCivic space score (0–100)V-Dem Electoral Democracy IndexElectoral democracy index (0–1)Perceptions of Electoral Integrity IndexElectoral Integrity Index (0–100; higher = greater electoral integrity)
South Korea=38th1.19572.930.81967.86
North Koreacompare196th-1.4862.170.083—

“—”: no published reading in that edition. What a standing is

Across Eastern Asia

Every country in the sub-region, by its place among all 198.

Placed either side on democracy & civil liberties

The countries immediately above and below South Korea in the topic’s list.

04Context, no vote

Where South Korea is ahead of the world, and behind

25 more statistics filed under democracy & civil liberties, published in full and deliberately given no vote in the standing. Select a row for the publisher, the rank and the links.

Every country

Ahead of the world median22

Statistics on which South Korea does better than the middle country measured.

  • Government Internet ShutdownsV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 1.0231.979No real change since 2015

    South Korea: 1.979 · world median 1.023 · Original latent estimate (≈ −4 to +2); higher = fewer shutdowns. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.547 to 2.081; higher is better.

    Position 3rd of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Freedom of Expression and Alternative Sources of Information IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.6930.933▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.933 · world median 0.693 · Freedom of expression index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.013 to 0.98; higher is better.

    Position 12th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Deliberative Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.3390.751▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.751 · world median 0.339 · Deliberative democracy index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.011 to 0.867; higher is better.

    Position 16th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Freedom of Peaceful AssemblyV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.7562.542▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 2.542 · world median 0.756 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.5 to +3.5); higher = more freedom. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.344 to 3.486; higher is better.

    Position 18th of 172 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Egalitarian Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.3210.712▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.712 · world median 0.321 · Egalitarian democracy index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.016 to 0.876; higher is better.

    Position 20th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Liberal Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.3530.739▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.739 · world median 0.353 · Liberal democracy index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.009 to 0.884; higher is better.

    Position 22nd of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Participatory Democracy IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.2980.551▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.551 · world median 0.298 · Participatory democracy index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.008 to 0.785; higher is better.

    Position 27th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Physical Violence IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.790.952▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.952 · world median 0.79 · Freedom from political killings and torture (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.053 to 0.989; higher is better.

    Position 28th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Neopatrimonial Rule IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.4450.097▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.097 · world median 0.445 · Neopatrimonial rule index (0–1; higher = more personalised rule). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.008 to 0.989; lower is better.

    Position 148th of 176 · derived, 1st = worst.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Government Censorship of the MediaV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.5651.867▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 1.867 · world median 0.565 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3 to +3.5); higher = less censorship. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.017 to 3.489; higher is better.

    Position 29th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Academic Freedom IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.6190.85▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.85 · world median 0.619 · Academic freedom index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.019 to 0.978; higher is better.

    Position 35th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Government Social Media CensorshipV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.5051.651▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 1.651 · world median 0.505 · Original latent estimate (≈ −4.5 to +2.4); higher = less censorship. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.721 to 2.295; higher is better.

    Position 36th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Judicial Constraints on the Executive IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.6760.872▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.872 · world median 0.676 · Judicial constraints on the executive index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.003 to 0.988; higher is better.

    Position 36th of 175 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Equal Protection IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.6510.817▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.817 · world median 0.651 · Equal protection index (0–1); higher = rights and freedoms protected more equally across social groups and classes. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.027 to 0.986; higher is better.

    Position 38th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Government Dissemination of False Information (Domestic)V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median -0.1141.132▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 1.132 · world median -0.114 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +3.2); higher = less disinformation. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.392 to 2.93; higher is better.

    Position 38th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Women's Political Empowerment IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.7720.878▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.878 · world median 0.772 · Women's political empowerment index (0–1). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.028 to 0.954; higher is better.

    Position 37th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Exclusion by Socio-Economic GroupV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2023 · world median 0.4130.163▼ Worsened since 2013

    South Korea: 0.163 · world median 0.413 · Exclusion by socio-economic group index (0–1; higher = more exclusion). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2023 edition, data for 2023.

    Published values in that edition run from 0.014 to 0.969; lower is better.

    Position 137th of 174 · derived, 1st = worst.

    Chart and every countryThe 2023 dataset

  • Military Dimension IndexV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.10▼ Worsened since 2015

    South Korea: 0 · world median 0.1 · Military dimension index (0–1; higher = larger military role). V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from 0 to 1; lower is better.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Voice and AccountabilityWorld Bank Group · 2025 · world median -0.0220.876▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 0.876 · world median -0.022 · Voice and Accountability estimate (−2.5 to 2.5). World Bank Group, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -2.348 to 1.825; higher is better.

    Position 49th of 206 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Freedom of ReligionV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 1.2961.836▼ Worsened since 2015

    South Korea: 1.836 · world median 1.296 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.5 to +3); higher = more religious freedom. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.294 to 2.792; higher is better.

    Position 49th of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Social Institutions and Gender IndexOECD · 2023 · world median 25.219.8No earlier reading

    South Korea: 19.8 · world median 25.2 · SIGI score (0 = no discrimination, 100 = absolute). OECD, 2023 edition, data for 2023.

    Published values in that edition run from 6.7 to 67.4; lower is better.

    Position 87th of 140 · derived, 1st = worst.

    Chart and every countryThe 2023 dataset

  • Freedom of Foreign MovementV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 1.21.516▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 1.516 · world median 1.2 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +2.9); higher = freer movement. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.642 to 2.727; higher is better.

    Position 72nd of 176 · derived.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

Behind the world median2

Statistics on which South Korea does worse than the middle country measured.

  • Political PolarizationV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.3591.438▼ Worsened since 2015

    South Korea: 1.438 · world median 0.359 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.8 to +3.9); higher = more polarized. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -2.974 to 3.682; lower is better.

    Position 40th of 172 · derived, 1st = worst.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

  • Compliance with Labour RightsILO · 2024 · world median 1.615.63▲ Improved since 2015

    South Korea: 5.63 · world median 1.61 · Compliance with freedom of association and collective bargaining rights (0 = best, 10 = worst). International Labour Organization (ILO), 2024 edition, data for 2024.

    Published values in that edition run from 0 to 10; lower is better.

    Chart and every countryThe 2024 dataset

No better end1

These describe the shape of a country — more is not better or worse, only different — so they are never ahead or behind.

  • Mass MobilizationV-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 2025 · world median 0.1913.129Moved since 2015

    South Korea: 3.129 · world median 0.191 · Original latent estimate (≈ −3.6 to +4); higher = more and larger events. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, 2025 edition, data for 2025.

    Published values in that edition run from -3.318 to 3.847.

    Chart and every countryThe 2025 dataset

“Position · derived” is this site’s ordering of the published values, 1st = best unless the row says otherwise; the publisher ranks no country on it. Rank, position and standing

06The top of the list

Who leads on democracy & civil liberties

The three countries placed highest of 198, and the leaders South Korea can most readily be measured against.

All 198 countries
  1. 1

    Norway

    Northern Europe

    1st of 198 · 4 of 4 keys

    Photo: Ximonic , Simo Räsänen · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  2. 2

    Denmark

    Northern Europe

    2nd of 198 · 4 of 4 keys

    Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  3. 3

    Liechtenstein

    Western Europe

    3rd of 198 · 2 of 4 keys

    Photo: Guido Radig,Inkey · CC BY 3.0, greyscale

Placed highest nearby

  1. Highest in Asia

    Japan28th4/4 keys
  2. This page

    South Korea=38th4/4 keys

Positions out of 198 placed on the topic. A country needs readings on enough keys to be placed, and the top of the list is often held on fewer of them.

08Questions

South Korea on democracy & civil liberties: questions answered

Every answer is built from the numbers on this page, so none can say something the page does not.

How does South Korea rank on democracy & civil liberties?

South Korea is placed joint 38th of 198 countries on Democracy & Civil Liberties in the Country Index 2026, from 4 of its 4 key statistics (Rule of Law, Civic Space Ratings, V-Dem Electoral Democracy Index and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Index). The position is this site’s ordering of published statistics, not a rank any publisher printed.

What is the latest Rule of Law figure for South Korea?

1.195 in 2025 (rule of Law estimate (−2.5 to 2.5)), according to World Bank Group. The world median in the same edition was -0.102.

What is the latest Civic Space Ratings figure for South Korea?

72.93 in 2025 (civic space score (0–100)), according to CIVICUS. The world median in the same edition was 50.46.

How does South Korea compare with North Korea on democracy & civil liberties?

North Korea is placed 196th of 198, and South Korea joint 38th. Rule of Law: North Korea -1.486, South Korea 1.195; Civic Space Ratings: North Korea 2.17, South Korea 72.93; V-Dem Electoral Democracy Index: North Korea 0.083, South Korea 0.819.

How have South Korea’s democracy & civil liberties figures changed?

Rule of Law rose from 0.75 in 2000 to 1.195 in 2025; V-Dem Electoral Democracy Index fell from 0.829 in 2000 to 0.819 in 2025.

09Method

Method, sources and how to cite

What this topic does not measure

This topic does not judge whether a government is competent or honest — that is Governance & Institutions — and it does not measure economic freedom. It also cannot capture everything about a political system in a single place in a list, which is why every key behind it links to the publisher's full edition.

About democracy & civil liberties, in full

How the Democracy & Civil Liberties standing is decided

A standing is this site’s ordering, named with its edition — never a publisher’s rank. 4 key statistics vote, one vote each; every country’s published value becomes a place within that key’s own field, the places are averaged, and the average is never published. A country needs 2 of the 4 keys to be placed.

The democracy & civil liberties method, step by stepHow every standing on this site is built

The key statistics and their licences

The other 25 statistics on this page come from 4 publishers, each named beside its numbers, with every edition and licence on the datasets pages.

The standing itself is part of the Country Index 2026, published under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Photographs

South Korea’s banner and the countries placed highest, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). South Korea: Democracy & Civil Liberties — standing and statistics, Country Index 2026. https://nationsinquiry.com/countries/south-korea/democracy

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.