Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2015

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015

2015, as ILO’s 2026 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015 covers 62 countries on 3 measures. Armenia is highest, at 39.976; Thailand is lowest, at 1.615. The middle country reads 14.816. Against 2014, 56 values changed (20 up, 36 down), 6 countries joined, 10 left.

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4) · Data for 2015

HighestArmenia

39.976

LowestThailand

1.615

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the lowest end. A higher value is the worse result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015, as published. ILO ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 62 countries · select a heading to sort

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015: every country, as published by International Labour Organization (ILO).
derived
1ArmeniaARMWestern Asia39.97643.8336.054—
2Bosnia and HerzegovinaBIHSouthern Europe39.54345.2835.497—
3AlbaniaALBSouthern Europe38.71642.0935.913—
4South AfricaZAFSouthern Africa37.95542.8933.637—
5PalestinePSEWestern Asia33.30051.7727.578—
6SerbiaSRBSouthern Europe33.27835.1031.801—
7GreeceGRCSouthern Europe32.78638.4428.144—
8SpainESPSouthern Europe32.54538.1327.546—
9North MacedoniaMKDSouthern Europe31.49231.4131.550—
10CyprusCYPWestern Asia30.61431.0130.234—
11MontenegroMNESouthern Europe28.64529.8127.656—
12CroatiaHRVSouthern Europe26.14627.9324.523—
13ItalyITASouthern Europe26.11530.9722.255—
14Costa RicaCRICentral America25.79834.8719.177—
15ChileCHLSouth America24.34830.2819.794—
16PortugalPRTSouthern Europe23.68125.6921.729—
17FranceFRAWestern Europe21.72123.6819.897—
18FinlandFINNorthern Europe20.16920.3819.966—
19Dominican RepublicDOMCaribbean19.87827.2914.423Break in series
20GhanaGHAWestern Africa18.76619.6217.757Break in series
21UruguayURYSouth America18.13022.0814.729—
22LatviaLVANorthern Europe17.82517.6018.049—
23SloveniaSVNSouthern Europe17.60919.7315.784—
24NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe17.46320.8214.515—
25IrelandIRLNorthern Europe17.29116.9517.570—

02In 2015

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Armenia39.976
  2. 2Bosnia and Herzegovina39.543
  3. 3Albania38.716
  4. 4South Africa37.955
  5. 5Palestine33.300

Lowest

  1. 62Thailand1.615
  2. 61Vietnam4.364
  3. 60Moldova5.614
  4. 59Czechia6.716
  5. 58United States7.176

A higher value is the worse result. The middle country reads 14.816. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032014 → 2015

Since 2014

What changed between 2014 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +6 / −10countries joined / left
  • 56values changed, of 56 in both
  • 20 · 36rose · fell
  • 0unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

+ Barbados+ Dominican Republic+ Ghana+ Palestine+ Seychelles+ Togo− Afghanistan− Burundi− Brunei− Comoros− Micronesia− South Korea− Rwanda− Sierra Leone− Yemen− Zimbabwe

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2026 release

    Every year in this series comes from ILO’s 2026 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2015.

  • The position is ours

    ILO publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the worse result.

  • 58 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

  • Some readings carry a flag

    ILO marks readings it considers estimates or provisional. The flags in this file: Break in series.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 4.0. Share, adapt and use commercially. Credit the publisher and say if you changed anything.

Cite this edition

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2015). Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015 [data set], describing 2015. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/labour-underutilisation/2015

0611 held

Other years

07Questions

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015: questions and answers

Which country has the highest labour underutilisation in Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015?

Armenia, at 39.976, of the 62 countries in the file.

What year does Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015 describe?

2015.

How many countries does Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015 cover?

62.

Where can I download Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2015 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2024.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.